· Public charity
Familycare Inc
To provide programs of cooperative and comprehensive healthcare to the community.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k1 grant · $8k
- $10k–50k15 grants · $230k
- $250k+1 grant · $5.7M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| THE HEATHERINGTON FOUNDATION | $5,740,480 |
| MUSLIM EDUCATIONAL TRUST | $30,000 |
| OREGON HISTORICAL SOCIETY | $25,000 |
| ASIAN HEALTH & SERVICE CENTER | $25,000 |
| BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF GREATER SANTIAM | $21,600 |
| MAURICE LUCAS FOUNDATION | $19,208 |
| BLANCHET HOUSE OF HOSPITALITY | $15,000 |
| WESTERN UNIVERSITY COMPNW | $12,500 |
| OREGON SYMPHONY | $12,000 |
| THE LUND REPORT | $10,000 |
| UNITED FEDERAL OF OSTEOPATHIC SCIENCES | $10,000 |
| NEW NARRATIVE PDX | $10,000 |
| PROJECT ACCESS NOW | $10,000 |
| PSU FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| CASCADIA HEALTH | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $408k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 95% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
17 repeat relationships — 12 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $48k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- BGBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE GREATER SANTIAM3× · 2020–2024 · $332k · revenue +11%
LIFEWORKS NW5× · 2017–2023 · $294k · revenue +39%
Latino Network5× · 2017–2024 · $226k · revenue +306%
Funded once
WILLAMETTE UNIVERSITYgraduatedone grant, 2019 · $3.0M · revenue +37%- AOAMERICAN OSTEOPATHIC FOUNDATIONone grant, 2019 · $1.0M · revenue +0% · 37% of their budget
MEALS ON WHEELS PEOPLE INCone grant, 2020 · $250k · revenue +10%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Advocate for policies that protect and promote healthy and health equity for all people in oregon and provide learning, collaboration and leadership opportunities for public health professionals and the broader community.
To inspire and partner to create quality and equity in individual and community health.
We partner with our community to make good health possible for all. wallace serves individuals and families who face barriers to care throughout the east multnomah county in the portland metropolitan area.
We offer our homeless neighbors accessible whole-person care to improve and support health, and to bridge a gap in trust between people and systems.
Sea mar community health centers is a community-based organization committed to providing quality, comprehensive health, human, housing, educational, and cultural services to diverse communities, specializing in service to latinos.
Eastern oregon health & wellness provides recovery housing and outpatient services that support individuals and families impacted by substance use disorder through safe housing, trauma-informed care, and community-based support.
The mission of the oma is to speak as the unified voice of medicine in oregon; advocate for a sustainable, equitable, and accessible healthcare environment; and energize physicians and physician assistants by building and supporting their…
The mission of the coalition of community health clinics is to improve healthcare for vulnerable populations residing in the portland-metro area. we strengthen community clinics, promote health equity, and foster collaboration across the…
Building brighter futures with children and families.
In 2024, IAF Pacific continued its work of connecting and strengthening broad-based alliances throughout the Pacific region.Through its Building Partnerships for Collaborative Action initiativethe organization supported Indigenous and…
Impact nw prevents homelessness by supporting people as they navigate their journey to stability and strength. founded in portland in 1966, impact nw now serves 26,944 people a year in the greater portland, oregon metro area, including…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Lifeworks Nw and the most unlike its peers is Heatherington Foundation for Innovation and Education in Health Care. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 43 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
45 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 45 of the 62 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds HEATHERINGTON FOUNDATION FOR INNOVATION AND EDUCATION IN HEALTH CARE ↗
- Who funds WILLAMETTE UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN OSTEOPATHIC FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE GREATER SANTIAM ↗
- Who funds LIFEWORKS NW ↗
- Who funds MEALS ON WHEELS PEOPLE INC ↗
- Who funds Latino Network ↗
- Who funds ASIAN HEALTH & SERVICE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds URBAN LEAGUE OF PORTLAND INC ↗
- Who funds SELF ENHANCEMENT INC ↗
- Who funds OREGON SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds OREGON FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds KAIROSPDX ↗
- Who funds NORTHWEST FAMILY SERVICES ↗
- Who funds OREGON HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds MAURICE LUCAS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Project Access Now ↗
- Who funds Yes for Clackamas Kids ↗
- Who funds CASCADE AIDS PROJECT ↗
- Who funds NATIVE AMERICAN YOUTH AND FAMILY CENTER ↗
- Who funds Special Olympics Oregon Inc ↗
- Who funds YAKIMA VALLEY FARM WORKERS CLINIC ↗
- Who funds NATIVE AMERICAN REHABILITATION ASSOCIATION OF THE NORTHWEST INC ↗
- Who funds PHAME ACADEMY ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN OSTEOPATHIC ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds RANDALL CHILDRENS HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Verde Inc ↗
- Who funds Portland Backpack ↗
- Who funds LEBANON SOUP KITCHEN ↗
- Who funds Central City Concern ↗
- Who funds The Lund Report ↗
- Who funds OSTEOPATHIC PHYSICIANS & SURGEONS OF OREGON ↗
- Who funds BLANCHET HOUSE OF HOSPITALITY ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Meyer Memorial Trust · Careoregon Inc · The Oregon Community Foundation · OCF Joseph E Weston Public Foundation · The Collins Foundation · Marie Lamfrom Charitable Foundation Trust · Heatherington Foundation for Innovation and Education in Health Care · Providence Health & Services - Oregon · The Harold & Arlene Schnitzer Care Foundation · United Way of the Columbia-Willamette · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · Health Share of Oregon
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Familycare Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- The Intertwine Alliance Foundation — 47% of income from government
- Northwest Family Services — 35% of income from government
- Urban League of Portland Inc — 33% of income from government
- Adelante Mujeres — 31% of income from government
- Native American Youth and Family Center — 23% of income from government
- Oregon Food Bank — 21% of income from government
- Kairospdx — 19% of income from government
- Asian Health & Service Center Inc — 18% of income from government
- Native American Rehabilitation Association of the Northwest Inc — 16% of income from government
- Latino Network — 15% of income from government
- Self Enhancement Inc — 14% of income from government
- Boys & Girls Clubs of the Greater Santiam — 14% of income from government
- Cascade Aids Project — 13% of income from government
- Oregon Historical Society — 10% of income from government
- Central City Concern — 10% of income from government
- Lifeworks Nw — 8% of income from government
- Familias en Accion — 8% of income from government
- Skanner Foundation — 8% of income from government
- New Narrative — 6% of income from government
- North By Northeast Community Health Center — 4% of income from government
- Verde Inc — 3% of income from government
- Cascadia Health — 3% of income from government
- Project Access Now — 2% of income from government
- Willamette University — 1% of income from government
- Phame Academy — 0% of income from government
- Oregon Symphony Association — 0% of income from government
- The Lund Report — 0% of income from government
- Randall Childrens Hospital Foundation — 0% of income from government
- Portland State University Foundation — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.