Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Greater Columbia Accountable Community of Health

The mission of the gcach is to advance the health of our population by decreasing health disparities, improving efficiency of health care delivery, and empowering individuals and communities through collaboration, innovation, and community engagement.

$3.8M
Granted FY2024still arriving
34
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$360k
Largest
01What you fund
01

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 42% of GREATER COLUMBIA ACCOUNTABLE COMMUNITY OF HEALTH’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2024 · 34 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 34 grants below total $3,612,770 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $3,767,277 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $154,507 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $15k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $165k
  • $50k–250k23 grants · $2.5M
  • $250k+3 grants · $978k
$90,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$71M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
KITTITAS COUNTY HEALTH NETWORK$359,868
SOUTHEAST WASHINGTON ALLIANCE FOR HEALTH$342,146
BENTON FRANKLIN HEALTH DISTRICT$276,021
COMMUNITY HEALTH OF CENTRAL WASHINGTON$214,637
YAKIMA NEIGHBORHOOD HEALTH SERVICES$178,240
KITTITAS COUNTY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT 6$174,943
BLUE MOUNTAIN HEART TO HEART$135,841
TTAWAXT BIRTH JUSTICE CENTER$130,874
GARFIELD COUNTY FIRE DISTRICT #1$127,216
UPPER KITTITAS MEDIC ONE (KITTITAS COUNTY PUBLIC HOSPITAL #2)$111,752
KADLEC REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER$110,000
COLUMBIA COUNTY PUBLIC HOSPITAL DISTRICT #1$110,000
BENTON COUNTY FIRE PROTECTIONS DISTRICT #4$100,000
WALLA WALLA FIREFIGHTERS BENEVOLENT ASSOCIATION$100,000
PROVIDENCE MEDICAL GROUP$100,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–24, $1.9M) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%RURAL RESOURCES COMMUNITY ACTION: $85k → 13%RURAL RESOURCES COMMUNITY ACTION: $44k → 13%BENTON FRANKLIN COMMUNITY ACTION COMMITTEE: $41k → 11%LUTHERAN COMMUNITY SERVICES NORTHWEST: $218k → 11%COMMUNITY ACTION CENTER: $75k → 20%LUTHERAN COMMUNITY SERVICES NORTHWEST: $123k → 11%HOPESOURCE: $75k → 11%LUTHERAN COMMUNITY SERVICES NORTHWEST: $110k → 11%TRI-CITIES CHAPLAINCY: $577k → 11%LA CASA HOGAR: $78k → 17%HOPESOURCE: $6k → 11%LUTHERAN COMMUNITY SERVICES NORTHWEST: $59k → 11%TTAWAXT BIRTH JUSTICE CENTER: $131k → 17%WALLA WALLA SENIOR CENTER: $74k → 13%CATHOLIC CHARITIES WALLA WALLA: $67k → 13%TRI-CITIES CHAPLAINCY: $74k → 11%PEOPLE FOR PEOPLE: $75k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$46M · 65 repeat orgs$2.5M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +41% since the first grant, against +20% for the ones you funded once.

65 repeat relationships — 19 still active in FY2024, 46 since wound down; 13 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

65
21

Total granted

$46M
$1.4M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+41%
+20%

Still filing today

55%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 70% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.1M went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesEducationPhilanthropyYouth DevelopmentFood & NutritionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • YV
    YAKIMA VALLEY FARM WORKERS CLINIC
    4× · 2019–2022 · $2.1M · revenue +78%
  • KR
    KADLEC REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER
    5× · 2019–2024 · $2.0M · revenue +44%
  • YN
    YAKIMA NEIGHBORHOOD HEALTH SERVICES
    6× · 2019–2024 · $2.0M · revenue +73%

Funded once

  • SH
    SECOND HARVEST INLAND NORTHWEST
    one grant, 2020 · $300k · revenue +14%
  • GC
    GREATER COLUMBIA ACCOUNTABLE COMMUNITY OF HEALTHgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $175k · revenue +142%
  • CO
    CITY OF SUNNYSIDE
    one grant, 2023 · $150k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Regional West Health Services

Health care services for the people of western nebraska and eastern wyoming.

Health
2
The Wallace Medical Concern

We partner with our community to make good health possible for all. wallace serves individuals and families who face barriers to care throughout the east multnomah county in the portland metropolitan area.

3
Northwest Community Health Care

The mission of the organization is to provide primary medical, dental, behavioral health, pharmacy and related support services to the residents of the Rhode Island communities that it serves regardless of ability to pay. The emphasis is…

Health
4
Columbia Valley Community Health

The mission of columbia valley community health is partnering to achieve optimal health and wellness with compassion and respect for all.

Health
5
Wenatchee Valley Hospital

We are dedicated to improving our patients' health by providing safe, high-quality care in a compassionate and cost-effective manner.

6
Community Health Center of Snohomish County

Community health center of snohomish county (chc) provides our diverse communities with access to high quality, affordable primary health care.

Health
7
Peninsula Community Health Services of Alaska

Strengthening the community by providing accessible and affordable health care.

Health
8
Washington Health Care Association

Trade association dedicated to providing educational opportunities, legal and regulatory advice, quality compliance assistance, lobbying and discounted group member benefits for long-term care facilities.

9
Olympic Peninsula Community Clinic

Improving the quality of life for the people in the Olympic Peninsula Community by providing increased access to health and wellness services for the underserved

Health
10
Washington Association for Community Health

The mission of washington association for community health is to strengthen and advocate for washington's community health centers (chcs) as they build healthcare access, innovation, and value. the association provides training and…

11
Central Washington Health Services Association

Local care by and for our community.

Health
12
Columbia County Community Healthcare Consortium Inc

The mission of the columbia county community healthcare consortium, inc. is improving access to healthcare and supporting the health and well-being of people in our rural community.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Tri-Cities Community Health and the most unlike its peers is Student Health Options. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyYakima Valley Community Org…Faith-Based K-12 SchoolsEducation Foundations and A…Community Performing Arts O…International Christian Mis…Employee Health Benefit Tru…Walla Walla Regional Develo…Kittitas County Community O…Regional Healthcare SystemsRegional Healthcare SystemsYakima Valley Community Org…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 30 years old; the field is 17. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number21%5%<5yr13%11%5–10yr19%9%10–20yr15%31%20–35yr13%28%35–55yr19%16%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value21%4%<5yr13%7%5–10yr19%6%10–20yr15%26%20–35yr13%37%35–55yr19%20%55yr+

The field is 21% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 4% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/101
the rest of the field
11%
564/5,221

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

64 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 64 of the 102 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

4
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
62/64
Grantees still filing
43/64
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

YAKIMA VALLEY FARM WORKERS CLINIC — $2,072,980 · HealthYAKIMA VALLEY FARM WORKERS CLINICKADLEC REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER — $2,042,044 · HealthKADLEC REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTERYAKIMA NEIGHBORHOOD HEALTH SERVICES — $1,995,224 · HealthYAKIMA NEIGHBORHOOD HEALTH SERVICESCOMMUNITY HEALTH OF CENTRAL WASHINGTON — $1,843,335 · HealthCOMMUNITY HEALTH OF CENTRAL WASHINGTONCOMPREHENSIVE HEALTHCARE — $1,636,829 · HealthCOMPREHENSIVE HEALTHCARETRI-STATE MEMORIAL HOSPITAL — $1,515,104 · HealthTRI-STATE MEMORIAL HOSPITALPROVIDENCE HEALTH & SERVICES - WASHINGTON — $1,443,161 · HealthPROVIDENCE HEALTH & SERVICES - WASHINGTONQUALITY BEHAVIORAL HEALTH — $1,116,481 · HealthSUNNYSIDE COMMUNITY HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION — $1,066,810 · HealthYAKIMA VALLEY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION — $780,896 · Health+21 more — $7,456,609 · Health+21 moreLOURDES HOSPITAL LLC — $2,435,073 · OtherLOURDES HOSPITAL LLCCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE DIOCESE OF YAKIMA — $1,582,820 · OtherCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE DIOCESE OF YAKIMACOLUMBIA COUNTY PUBLIC HOSPITAL DISTRICT 1 — $1,535,662 · OtherCOLUMBIA COUNTY PUBLIC HOSPITAL DISTRICT 1TRI-CITIES COMMUNITY HEALTH — $1,316,959 · OtherTRI-CITIES COMMUNITY HEALTHKITTITAS COUNTY PUBLIC HOSPITAL DIST 1 — $1,272,436 · OtherKITTITAS COUNTY PUBLIC HOSPITAL DIST 1GARFIELD COUNTY HOSPITAL DISTRICT POMEROY MEDICAL CLINIC — $1,161,906 · OtherGARFIELD COUNTY HOSPITAL DISTRICT POMEROY MEDICA…IDEAL OPTION PLLC — $1,024,936 · OtherPROSSER PUBLIC HOSPITAL DISTRICT OF BENTON COUNTY — $984,872 · Other+42 more — $9,986,628 · Other+42 morePULLMAN REGIONAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION — $1,245,964 · Philanthropy3 Rivers Community Foundation — $650,421 · PhilanthropyYAKIMA VALLEY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $621,619 · PhilanthropyBLUE MOUNTAIN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $519,807 · Philanthropy+1 more — $97,944 · PhilanthropyTri-Cities Chaplaincy — $650,772 · Human ServicesLutheran Community Services Northwest — $509,765 · Human ServicesTTAWAXT BIRTH JUSTICE CENTER — $130,874 · Human ServicesRURAL RESOURCES COMMUNITY ACTION — $129,131 · Human ServicesHOPESOURCE — $80,760 · Human ServicesLA CASA HOGAR — $78,000 · Human ServicesPEOPLE FOR PEOPLE — $75,000 · Human ServicesCommunity Action Center — $75,000 · Human ServicesWALLA WALLA SENIOR CITIZENS CENTER — $73,817 · Human ServicesCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SPOKANE — $67,363 · Human Services+1 more — $41,000 · Human ServicesHERITAGE UNIVERSITY — $400,000 · EducationPACIFIC NORTHWEST UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH SCIENCES — $56,800 · EducationCHILDREN'S DEVELOPMENTAL CENTER — $50,000 · EducationSECOND HARVEST INLAND NORTHWEST — $300,000 · Food & NutritionCITY OF KENNEWICK FOUNDATION — $150,000 · Community Improvement
Health$22,969,473Other$21,301,292Philanthropy$3,135,755Human Services$1,911,482Education$506,800Food & Nutrition$300,000Community Improvement$150,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetYAKIMA VALLEY FARM WORKERS CLINIC — $2,072,980 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetKADLEC REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER — $2,042,044 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetYAKIMA NEIGHBORHOOD HEALTH SERVICES — $1,995,224 over 6y, 2.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY HEALTH OF CENTRAL WASHINGTON — $1,843,335 over 6y, 1.4% of budgetCOMPREHENSIVE HEALTHCARE — $1,636,829 over 4y, 1.0% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE DIOCESE OF YAKIMA — $1,582,820 over 4y, 1.8% of budgetTRI-STATE MEMORIAL HOSPITAL — $1,515,104 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetPROVIDENCE HEALTH & SERVICES - WASHINGTON — $1,443,161 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTRI-CITIES COMMUNITY HEALTH — $1,316,959 over 4y, 2.0% of budgetPULLMAN REGIONAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION — $1,245,964 over 4y, 18% of budgetQUALITY BEHAVIORAL HEALTH — $1,116,481 over 4y, 9.2% of budgetSUNNYSIDE COMMUNITY HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION — $1,066,810 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetYAKIMA VALLEY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION — $780,896 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetSHC MEDICAL CENTER - TOPPENISH — $736,448 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetSTUDENT HEALTH OPTIONS — $688,431 over 5y, 35% of budgetTri-Cities Chaplaincy — $650,772 over 2y, 4.1% of budget3 Rivers Community Foundation — $650,421 over 2y, 12% of budgetYAKIMA VALLEY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $621,619 over 1y, 3.2% of budgetKITTITAS COUNTY HEALTH NETWORK — $604,152 over 5y, 17% of budgetPALOUSE RIVER COUNSELING CENTER INC — $593,756 over 4y, 4.4% of budgetSoutheast Washington Alliance for Health — $577,398 over 5y, 51% of budgetGarden Village — $576,255 over 3y, 4.2% of budgetYAKIMA VALLEY COUNCIL ON ALCOHOLISM — $570,546 over 4y, 2.5% of budgetCOLUMBIA BASIN HEALTH ASSOCIATION — $547,134 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetCommunity Health Association of Spokane — $544,372 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetVALLEY ALCOHOL COUNCIL dba MERIT RESOURCE SERVICES — $535,184 over 4y, 3.7% of budgetBLUE MOUNTAIN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $519,807 over 3y, 4.8% of budgetLutheran Community Services Northwest — $509,765 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetSundown M Ranch Corporation — $502,738 over 4y, 1.8% of budgetBlue Mountain Heart to Heart — $478,444 over 6y, 14% of budgetBLUE MOUNTAIN COUNSELING OF COLUMBIA COUNTY — $477,174 over 4y, 22% of budgetHERITAGE UNIVERSITY — $400,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetSECOND HARVEST INLAND NORTHWEST — $300,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetBENTON FRANKLIN COMMUNITY HEALTH ALLIANCE — $291,034 over 3y, 26% of budgetGREATER COLUMBIA ACCOUNTABLE COMMUNITY OF HEALTH — $175,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetSHC MEDICAL CENTER - YAKIMA — $139,426 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTTAWAXT BIRTH JUSTICE CENTER — $130,874 over 1y, 15% of budgetRURAL RESOURCES COMMUNITY ACTION — $129,131 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetTrilogy Recovery Community — $103,620 over 3y, 16% of budgetFISH — $97,944 over 2y, 2.3% of budgetGRACE CLINIC — $94,504 over 3y, 5.6% of budgetHOPESOURCE — $80,760 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetLA CASA HOGAR — $78,000 over 1y, 4.2% of budgetPEOPLE FOR PEOPLE — $75,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCAREER PATH SERVICES EMPLOYMENT AND TRAINING — $75,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTHE MEMORIAL FOUNDATION — $75,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF THE YAKAMA NATION — $75,000 over 1y, 21% of budgetPROVIDENCE ST MARY FOUNDATION — $75,000 over 1y, 3.7% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds YAKIMA VALLEY FARM WORKERS CLINIC
  • Who funds KADLEC REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER
  • Who funds YAKIMA NEIGHBORHOOD HEALTH SERVICES
  • Who funds COMMUNITY HEALTH OF CENTRAL WASHINGTON
  • Who funds COMPREHENSIVE HEALTHCARE
  • Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE DIOCESE OF YAKIMA
  • Who funds TRI-STATE MEMORIAL HOSPITAL
  • Who funds PROVIDENCE HEALTH & SERVICES - WASHINGTON
  • Who funds TRI-CITIES COMMUNITY HEALTH
  • Who funds PULLMAN REGIONAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION
  • Who funds QUALITY BEHAVIORAL HEALTH
  • Who funds SUNNYSIDE COMMUNITY HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION
  • Who funds YAKIMA VALLEY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION
  • Who funds SHC MEDICAL CENTER - TOPPENISH
  • Who funds STUDENT HEALTH OPTIONS
  • Who funds Tri-Cities Chaplaincy
  • Who funds 3 Rivers Community Foundation
  • Who funds YAKIMA VALLEY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION
  • Who funds KITTITAS COUNTY HEALTH NETWORK
  • Who funds PALOUSE RIVER COUNSELING CENTER INC
  • Who funds Southeast Washington Alliance for Health
  • Who funds Garden Village
  • Who funds YAKIMA VALLEY COUNCIL ON ALCOHOLISM
  • Who funds COLUMBIA BASIN HEALTH ASSOCIATION
  • Who funds Community Health Association of Spokane
  • Who funds VALLEY ALCOHOL COUNCIL dba MERIT RESOURCE SERVICES
  • Who funds BLUE MOUNTAIN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION
  • Who funds Lutheran Community Services Northwest

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Yakima Valley Community FoundationWA42.1× affinity18 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Yakima Valley Community Foundation · Inatai Foundation · Blue Mountain Community Foundation · Seattle Foundation · Northwest Harvest Emm · School's Out Washington · Providence Health & Services - Washington · Delta Dental of Washington · Perigee Fund · United Way of Central Washington · Second Harvest Inland Northwest · M J Murdock Charitable Trust

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Greater Columbia Accountable Community of Health funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    23report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 102 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph