· Public charity
Greater Columbia Accountable Community of Health
The mission of the gcach is to advance the health of our population by decreasing health disparities, improving efficiency of health care delivery, and empowering individuals and communities through collaboration, innovation, and community engagement.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 42% of GREATER COLUMBIA ACCOUNTABLE COMMUNITY OF HEALTH’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 34 grants below total $3,612,770 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $3,767,277 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $154,507 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k2 grants · $15k
- $10k–50k6 grants · $165k
- $50k–250k23 grants · $2.5M
- $250k+3 grants · $978k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| KITTITAS COUNTY HEALTH NETWORK | $359,868 |
| SOUTHEAST WASHINGTON ALLIANCE FOR HEALTH | $342,146 |
| BENTON FRANKLIN HEALTH DISTRICT | $276,021 |
| COMMUNITY HEALTH OF CENTRAL WASHINGTON | $214,637 |
| YAKIMA NEIGHBORHOOD HEALTH SERVICES | $178,240 |
| KITTITAS COUNTY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT 6 | $174,943 |
| BLUE MOUNTAIN HEART TO HEART | $135,841 |
| TTAWAXT BIRTH JUSTICE CENTER | $130,874 |
| GARFIELD COUNTY FIRE DISTRICT #1 | $127,216 |
| UPPER KITTITAS MEDIC ONE (KITTITAS COUNTY PUBLIC HOSPITAL #2) | $111,752 |
| KADLEC REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER | $110,000 |
| COLUMBIA COUNTY PUBLIC HOSPITAL DISTRICT #1 | $110,000 |
| BENTON COUNTY FIRE PROTECTIONS DISTRICT #4 | $100,000 |
| WALLA WALLA FIREFIGHTERS BENEVOLENT ASSOCIATION | $100,000 |
| PROVIDENCE MEDICAL GROUP | $100,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–24, $1.9M) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +41% since the first grant, against +20% for the ones you funded once.
65 repeat relationships — 19 still active in FY2024, 46 since wound down; 13 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 70% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.1M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- YVYAKIMA VALLEY FARM WORKERS CLINIC4× · 2019–2022 · $2.1M · revenue +78%
- KRKADLEC REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER5× · 2019–2024 · $2.0M · revenue +44%
- YNYAKIMA NEIGHBORHOOD HEALTH SERVICES6× · 2019–2024 · $2.0M · revenue +73%
Funded once
- SHSECOND HARVEST INLAND NORTHWESTone grant, 2020 · $300k · revenue +14%
- GCGREATER COLUMBIA ACCOUNTABLE COMMUNITY OF HEALTHgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $175k · revenue +142%
- COCITY OF SUNNYSIDEone grant, 2023 · $150k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Health care services for the people of western nebraska and eastern wyoming.
We partner with our community to make good health possible for all. wallace serves individuals and families who face barriers to care throughout the east multnomah county in the portland metropolitan area.
The mission of the organization is to provide primary medical, dental, behavioral health, pharmacy and related support services to the residents of the Rhode Island communities that it serves regardless of ability to pay. The emphasis is…
The mission of columbia valley community health is partnering to achieve optimal health and wellness with compassion and respect for all.
We are dedicated to improving our patients' health by providing safe, high-quality care in a compassionate and cost-effective manner.
Community health center of snohomish county (chc) provides our diverse communities with access to high quality, affordable primary health care.
Strengthening the community by providing accessible and affordable health care.
Trade association dedicated to providing educational opportunities, legal and regulatory advice, quality compliance assistance, lobbying and discounted group member benefits for long-term care facilities.
Improving the quality of life for the people in the Olympic Peninsula Community by providing increased access to health and wellness services for the underserved
The mission of washington association for community health is to strengthen and advocate for washington's community health centers (chcs) as they build healthcare access, innovation, and value. the association provides training and…
Local care by and for our community.
The mission of the columbia county community healthcare consortium, inc. is improving access to healthcare and supporting the health and well-being of people in our rural community.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Tri-Cities Community Health and the most unlike its peers is Student Health Options. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 30 years old; the field is 17. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 21% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 4% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
64 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 64 of the 102 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds YAKIMA VALLEY FARM WORKERS CLINIC ↗
- Who funds KADLEC REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER ↗
- Who funds YAKIMA NEIGHBORHOOD HEALTH SERVICES ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY HEALTH OF CENTRAL WASHINGTON ↗
- Who funds COMPREHENSIVE HEALTHCARE ↗
- Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE DIOCESE OF YAKIMA ↗
- Who funds TRI-STATE MEMORIAL HOSPITAL ↗
- Who funds PROVIDENCE HEALTH & SERVICES - WASHINGTON ↗
- Who funds TRI-CITIES COMMUNITY HEALTH ↗
- Who funds PULLMAN REGIONAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds QUALITY BEHAVIORAL HEALTH ↗
- Who funds SUNNYSIDE COMMUNITY HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds YAKIMA VALLEY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds SHC MEDICAL CENTER - TOPPENISH ↗
- Who funds STUDENT HEALTH OPTIONS ↗
- Who funds Tri-Cities Chaplaincy ↗
- Who funds 3 Rivers Community Foundation ↗
- Who funds YAKIMA VALLEY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds KITTITAS COUNTY HEALTH NETWORK ↗
- Who funds PALOUSE RIVER COUNSELING CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds Southeast Washington Alliance for Health ↗
- Who funds Garden Village ↗
- Who funds YAKIMA VALLEY COUNCIL ON ALCOHOLISM ↗
- Who funds COLUMBIA BASIN HEALTH ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds Community Health Association of Spokane ↗
- Who funds VALLEY ALCOHOL COUNCIL dba MERIT RESOURCE SERVICES ↗
- Who funds BLUE MOUNTAIN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Lutheran Community Services Northwest ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Yakima Valley Community Foundation · Inatai Foundation · Blue Mountain Community Foundation · Seattle Foundation · Northwest Harvest Emm · School's Out Washington · Providence Health & Services - Washington · Delta Dental of Washington · Perigee Fund · United Way of Central Washington · Second Harvest Inland Northwest · M J Murdock Charitable Trust
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Greater Columbia Accountable Community of Health funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.