· Public charity
Community Health Network of Washington
To improve the health status of our communities through the provision of high-quality, affordable, community-based health care to underserved individuals and families, and through sustaining the network of community health centers and affiliated businesses.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2022–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| YAKIMA VALLEY FARM WORKERS CLINIC | $50,000 |
| NEW HEALTH | $50,000 |
| COMMUNITY HEALTH CARE | $50,000 |
| UNITY CARE NORTHWEST | $50,000 |
| INTERNATIONAL COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICES | $50,000 |
| COMMUNITY HEALTH OF CENTRAL WASHINGTON | $50,000 |
| FAMILY HEALTH CENTERS (OKANOGAN) | $50,000 |
| NEIGHBORCARE HEALTH | $50,000 |
| MOSES LAKE COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER | $50,000 |
| SEA MAR COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER | $50,000 |
| YAKIMA NEIGHBORHOOD HEALTH SERVICES | $50,000 |
| VALLEY VIEW HEALTH CENTER | $50,000 |
| HEALTHPOINT | $50,000 |
| TRI-CITIES COMMUNITY HEALTH | $50,000 |
| NORTH OLYMPIC HEALTHCARE NETWORK | $50,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY22–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +16% since the first grant, against +13% for the ones you funded once.
16 repeat relationships — 16 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $150k went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CHCOMMUNITY HEALTH CARE3× · 2022–2024 · $100k · revenue +4%
- YNYAKIMA NEIGHBORHOOD HEALTH SERVICES3× · 2022–2024 · $100k · revenue +7%
- HHEALTHPOINT3× · 2022–2024 · $100k · revenue +30%
Funded once
- TCTRI-CITIES COMMUNITY HEALTH2× · 2023–2024 · $50k · revenue +7%
- YVYAKIMA VALLEY FARM WORKERS CLINICone grant, 2024 · $50k · revenue +13%
- CVCOLUMBIA VALLEY COMMUNITY HEALTHone grant, 2024 · $50k · revenue +13%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Community health center of snohomish county (chc) provides our diverse communities with access to high quality, affordable primary health care.
Health care services for the people of western nebraska and eastern wyoming.
The mission of the organization is to provide primary medical, dental, behavioral health, pharmacy and related support services to the residents of the Rhode Island communities that it serves regardless of ability to pay. The emphasis is…
Strengthening the community by providing accessible and affordable health care.
Advance health and social justice for all members of our community.
Provide exceptional, integrated, patient-centered health care services designed to meet the needs of all patients, particularly those who experience barriers to accessing care, regardless of their ability to pay.
La pine community health center improves lives in our community through accessible and affordable healthcare provided with kindness, integrity, and respect.
Community health care provides the communities we serve with excellence in patient-centered medical, dental, and behavioral health care that is compassionate, affordable, and accessible.
We provide quality healthcare to our community.
The mission of the columbia county community healthcare consortium, inc. is improving access to healthcare and supporting the health and well-being of people in our rural community.
To improve the health of our patients and community by providing high quality, cost-effective, culturally sensitive, patient-centered health care.
The organization provides primary medical, behavior health, and dental care to the population of san joaquin, and solano counties without regard to patients' ability to pay.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Health Care and the most unlike its peers is Sea Mar Community Health Centers. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds COMMUNITY HEALTH CARE ↗
- Who funds YAKIMA NEIGHBORHOOD HEALTH SERVICES ↗
- Who funds HEALTHPOINT ↗
- Who funds INTERNATIONAL COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICES ↗
- Who funds LEWIS COUNTY COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICES ↗
- Who funds SEA MAR COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS ↗
- Who funds Community Health Association of Spokane ↗
- Who funds MOSES LAKE COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER ↗
- Who funds PENINSULA COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICES ↗
- Who funds FAMILY HEALTH CENTERS ↗
- Who funds UNITY CARE NORTHWEST ↗
- Who funds NORTH OLYMPIC HEALTHCARE NETWORK ↗
- Who funds NEW HEALTH PROGRAMS ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds SEATTLE ROOTS COMMUNITY HEALTH ↗
- Who funds NEIGHBORCARE HEALTH ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY HEALTH OF CENTRAL WASHINGTON ↗
- Who funds TRI-CITIES COMMUNITY HEALTH ↗
- Who funds YAKIMA VALLEY FARM WORKERS CLINIC ↗
- Who funds COLUMBIA VALLEY COMMUNITY HEALTH ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Delta Dental of Washington · Seattle Foundation · Direct Relief · Reach Out and Read Inc · Washington Association for Community Health · Kaiser Foundation Health Plan of Washington · American Cancer Society Inc · M J Murdock Charitable Trust · The Roots and Wings Foundation Inc · Ptso of Washington · Inatai Foundation · American Heart Association Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Community Health Network of Washington funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Community Health Network of Washington?
Find your warmest path to Community Health Network of Washington through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.