How much did THRIVE WASHINGTON grant in FY2019?

THRIVE WASHINGTON reported 13 grants totaling $876,431 in its FY2019 IRS filing.

Where is THRIVE WASHINGTON based?

THRIVE WASHINGTON is based in WA.

THRIVE WASHINGTON

Foundation Dossiers Also receives grants — funding profile →

· Public charity

THRIVE WASHINGTON

THRIVE WASHINGTON advances high-quality early learning - with a commitment to innovation and equity - throughout washington state.

$876k

Granted FY2019

Grants

Communities

$153k

Largest

01What you fund

0161% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2018–2019.

Youth Development$428kHuman Services$322kHealth$175kPhilanthropy$169kEducation$13kOther$699k

02FY2019 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2019

Under $10k1 grant · $10k
$10k–50k2 grants · $23k
$50k–250k10 grants · $843k

$77,500

Median grant

States reached

$3.7M

Total assets

Largest grants

FIRST FIVE FUNDAMENTALS$152,750
CHILD CARE ACTION COUNCIL$85,407
COMMUNITY MINDED ENTERPRISES$79,297
SUPPORT FOR EARLY LEARNING FAMILIES$77,920
SCHOOL'S OUT WASHINGTON$77,500
EDUC SVC DISTR 189 NW$77,500
EDUC SVC DISTR 123$77,500
YAKIMA VALLEY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$77,500
EDUC SVC DISTR 114$77,500
UNITED WAY OF NORTH CENTRAL WA$60,327
UNITED WAY CHELANDOUGLAS COUNTIES$13,423
WITHIN REACH$10,000
TOTAL GRANTS UNDER 5K EACH$9,807

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–19, $322k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9% — the area typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$1.7M · 11 repeat orgs$118k to everyone else

11 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2019, 0 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2019 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$1.7M

$108k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+135%

+237%

Still filing today

55%

67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2019, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Youth DevelopmentHuman ServicesHealthPhilanthropyEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

FF
FIRST FIVE FUNDAMENTALS
2× · 2018–2019 · $240k · revenue +1546%
CM
COMMUNITY MINDED ENTERPRISES
2× · 2018–2019 · $175k · revenue +130%
SF
SUPPORT FOR EARLY LEARNING FAMILIES
2× · 2018–2019 · $174k · revenue +5310%

Funded once

ES
EDUC SVC DISTR 113 VISION FOR EL WC
one grant, 2018 · $33k
SC
SEATTLE CHILDRENS HOSPITAL FOUNDATION
one grant, 2018 · $20k · revenue +6%
VO
VOICES OF TOMORROWgraduated
one grant, 2018 · $19k · revenue +3538%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Whatcom Center for Early Learning

Whatcom Center for Early Learning's mission is to partner with families to provide high-quality, equitable, and comprehensive therapy and support to children experiencing developmental delays and disabilities.

Unclassified

Early Childhood Collective of Douglas County Inc

Early Childhood Collective connects the coalition of early childhood resources that serves growing families in Douglas County.

Education

Eastside Pathways

Transforming the way our community stakeholders work together, harnessing and aligning our individual and collective experience, to positively impact the lives of children and youth; intergenerationaly. we mobilize individuals and public,…

Education

Sound Child Care Solutions

Sound child care solutions (sccs) is a nonprofit organization and consortium of eight early childhood education centers, sharing administrative services in a central office. our core work is to alleviate the academic and opportunity gaps…

Education

Educare Dc

To eliminate the opportunity gap with high-quality early learning for children prenatal to age 5.

Human Services

Children's Council of San Francisco

Since 1974, Children's Council has been at the heart of early care and education in San Francisco.

Human Services

Mid-Columbia Childrens Council Inc

Educating children and families with innovative, high quality early childhood learning opportunities and family partnerships to build better communities, one person at a time.

Education

Washington State Child Care Resource

Management of statewide child care resource and referral system.

—

Bothell Family Cooperative Preschool

Bothell Family Cooperative Preschool is a group of 90 families who have children from 0-5 years old who are dedicated to nurturing the development of healthy families in a supportive community. Members are involved at every level to create…

—

Washington State Association of Head

WSA champions high-quality early learning through professional development, collaboration and advocacy for head start, early head start and early childhood education and assistance programs (ECEAP).

Education

The Valley School of Seattle

Pre-kindergarten to 5th grade independent school.

Education

Pathwaves Washington

Employment-based Fellowships meant to draw mid-career individuals into the early childhood policy sector through roles in policy and advocacy.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Child Care Action Council of and the most unlike its peers is United Way of Chelan & Douglas Counties. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

12 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

11/12

Grantees still filing

10/12

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$699,448Youth Development$428,063Human Services$321,809Health$174,623Philanthropy$168,602Education$12,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Seattle FoundationWA23.8× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Seattle Foundation · The Washington STEM Center · Kaiser Foundation Health Plan of Washington · Gates Foundation · Puget Sound Energy Foundation · Foundation for Tacoma Students · Stolte Family Foundation · Perigee Fund · School's Out Washington · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation THRIVE WASHINGTON funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: FIRST FIVE FUNDAMENTALS.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

medium risk

~3 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 9 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

9 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up 16.5× since.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 800209462 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on FIRST FIVE FUNDAMENTALS, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

WatchFinancial stability— Roughly 3 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2025; revenue grew over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 21% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Thrive Washington?

Find your warmest path to Thrive Washington through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

THRIVE WASHINGTON

What you funded, over time

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

12 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Thrive Washington?

More from the funding graph

THRIVE WASHINGTON

What you funded, over time

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

12 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Thrive Washington?

More from the funding graph