· Public charity
Washington Association for Community Health
The mission of WASHINGTON ASSOCIATION FOR COMMUNITY HEALTH is to strengthen and advocate for washington's community health centers (chcs) as they build healthcare access, innovation, and value.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2019–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 1 grants below total $6,560 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $97,361 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $90,801 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| IOWA PRIMARY CARE ASSOCIATION | $6,560 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY19–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +86% since the first grant, against +23% for the ones you funded once.
4 repeat relationships — 0 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $7k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- HHEALTHPOINT2× · 2019–2022 · $161k · revenue +86%
- SMSEA MAR COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS2× · 2019–2022 · $152k · revenue +81%
- WSWashington School-Based Health Alliance3× · 2021–2023 · $98k · revenue +135%
Funded once
- YVYAKIMA VALLEY FARM WORKERS CLINICgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $135k · revenue +31%
- PCPENINSULA COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICESone grant, 2022 · $81k · revenue +0%
- CHCOMMUNITY HEALTH OF CENTRAL WASHINGTONgraduatedone grant, 2019 · $28k · revenue +35%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Health care services for the people of western nebraska and eastern wyoming.
Community health center of snohomish county (chc) provides our diverse communities with access to high quality, affordable primary health care.
The mission of the organization is to provide primary medical, dental, behavioral health, pharmacy and related support services to the residents of the Rhode Island communities that it serves regardless of ability to pay. The emphasis is…
Strengthening the community by providing accessible and affordable health care.
Improving the quality of life for the people in the Olympic Peninsula Community by providing increased access to health and wellness services for the underserved
Provide exceptional, integrated, patient-centered health care services designed to meet the needs of all patients, particularly those who experience barriers to accessing care, regardless of their ability to pay.
Community health care provides the communities we serve with excellence in patient-centered medical, dental, and behavioral health care that is compassionate, affordable, and accessible.
La pine community health center improves lives in our community through accessible and affordable healthcare provided with kindness, integrity, and respect.
The mission of the columbia county community healthcare consortium, inc. is improving access to healthcare and supporting the health and well-being of people in our rural community.
We provide quality healthcare to our community.
The mission of columbia valley community health is partnering to achieve optimal health and wellness with compassion and respect for all.
To provide equal access to quality health care to all persons regardless of age, sex, color, ethnicity, national origin, or the ability to pay.primary activities: medical, dental, vision and related healthcare services.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Tri-Cities Community Health and the most unlike its peers is Sea Mar Community Health Centers. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds HEALTHPOINT ↗
- Who funds SEA MAR COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS ↗
- Who funds YAKIMA VALLEY FARM WORKERS CLINIC ↗
- Who funds Washington School-Based Health Alliance ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY HEALTH CARE ↗
- Who funds PENINSULA COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICES ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY HEALTH OF CENTRAL WASHINGTON ↗
- Who funds COWLITZ FAMILY HEALTH CENTER ↗
- Who funds Community Health Association of Spokane ↗
- Who funds SEATTLE INDIAN HEALTH BOARD ↗
- Who funds THE NATIVE PROJECT ↗
- Who funds TRI-CITIES COMMUNITY HEALTH ↗
- Who funds FAMILY HEALTH CENTERS ↗
- Who funds NORTH OLYMPIC HEALTHCARE NETWORK ↗
- Who funds LEWIS COUNTY COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICES ↗
- Who funds Iowa Primary Care Association Inc ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Delta Dental of Washington · Community Health Network of Washington · Seattle Foundation · Direct Relief · Reach Out and Read Inc · Kaiser Foundation Health Plan of Washington · Inatai Foundation · American Cancer Society Inc · American Heart Association Inc · Better Health Together · M J Murdock Charitable Trust · East Bay Community Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Washington Association for Community Health funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.