Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Yakima Valley Farm Workers Clinic

The mission of yvfwc is to improve lives and strengthen the health of the communities we serve by providing quality and accessible health care to all regardless of ability to pay.

$22M
Granted FY2025still arriving
2
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$18M
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Human Services$85MHealth$20MRecreation & Sports$186kHousing & Shelter$148kFood & Nutrition$59kInternational$25kCommunity Improvement$25kPublic Benefit$14kOther$0
02FY2025 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 2 grants below total $18,952,190 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $21,940,308 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $2,988,118 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

$18,000,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$336M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AGENA$18,000,000
MEMORIAL FOUNDATION$952,190
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $85.0M) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%AGENA: $21.0M → 17%AGENA: $18.0M → 17%AGENA: $18.0M → 17%AGENA: $15.0M → 17%AGENA: $13.0M → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$86M · 7 repeat orgs$19M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +29% since the first grant, against +10% for the ones you funded once.

7 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
13

Total granted

$86M
$19M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+29%
+10%

Still filing today

100%
69%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesHousing & ShelterEducationFood & NutritionRecreation & SportsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • A
    AGENA
    6× · 2019–2025 · $85M · revenue +103% · 96% of their budget
  • TM
    THE MEMORIAL FOUNDATION
    3× · 2023–2025 · $1.1M · revenue +45%
  • GC
    Grace City Outreach
    2× · 2021–2023 · $108k · revenue +14%

Funded once

  • YH
    YVFWC HEALTHCARE FACILITIES DEVELOPMENT II
    one grant, 2023 · $14M · 100% of their budget
  • YH
    YVFWC HEALTHCARE FACILITIES DEVELOPMENT
    one grant, 2021 · $4.2M · 42% of their budget
  • YV
    YAKIMA VALLEY COUNCIL ON ALCOHOLISM
    one grant, 2024 · $100k · revenue +10%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Yakima Valley Farm Workers Clinic

The mission of yvfwc is to improve lives and strengthen the health of the communities we serve by providing quality and accessible health care to all regardless of ability to pay.

Health
2
Yakima County Development Association dba New Vision Foundation

Enhance the income, quality of life and employment stability of yakima county residents by retaining, expanding, and recruiting business and industry.

Community Improvement
3
Greater Yakima Chamber of Commerce

We exist to be an advocate for our members and our business community to strengthen the development of our economy.

4
Yelm Area Chamber of Commerce

To promote business, civic, social and cultural awareness that maintain or increase the positive economic climate and ethical values of the community.

5
Yakima Arboretum Foundation

Received funds and managed assets for the sole benefit of the yakima area arboretum, a washington nonprofit corporation and 501(c)(3) organization.

Environment
6
Yakima Neighborhood Health Services

To improve the quality of life in our communities by providing accessible and integrated health and social services, ending homelessness, and offering unique learning opportunities for students of health professions.

Health
7
Yakima Valley Memorial Hospital Association

Partnering locally to support the communities we serve in the ways they need it most. because healthy communities need more than health care.

Health
8
Whatcom Alliance for Healthcare Access C/O Chuckanut Health Fdn

Waha is a nonprofit organization based in bellingham, washington whose mission is to connect people to health care and facilitate transformation of the current system into one that improves health, reduces cost and improves the experience…

9
Wenatchee Valley Hospital

We are dedicated to improving our patients' health by providing safe, high-quality care in a compassionate and cost-effective manner.

10
Highline Medical Center Foundation

Highline Medical Center Foundation brings our community together to support exceptional health care, close to home, for all who need it. Thanks to the generosity of our caring neighbors and friends, we help ensure that St Anne Hospital has…

Health
11
Young Womens Christian Association

The ywca is dedicated to eliminating racism and empowering women.

Human Services
12
Columbia Valley Community Health

The mission of columbia valley community health is partnering to achieve optimal health and wellness with compassion and respect for all.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Yakima Valley Community Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Spokane District Dental Society Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

4
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/20
Grantees still filing
13/20
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

AGENA — $85,000,000 · Human ServicesAGENAYVFWC HEALTHCARE FACILITIES DEVELOPMENT II — $14,001,005 · HealthYVFWC HEALTHCARE FACI…YVFWC HEALTHCARE FACILITIES DEVELOPMENT — $4,178,556 · HealthYVFWC HEALTHCARE FACI…THE MEMORIAL FOUNDATION — $1,095,124 · HealthTHE MEMORIAL FOUNDATI…+4 more — $235,362 · HealthGrace City Outreach — $108,000 · OtherUNION GOSPEL MISSION OF YAKIMA WASH — $40,000 · OtherAREA HEALTH EDUCATION CENTER OF SOUTHWEST OREGON — $25,000 · OtherYAKIMA COUNTY DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATION — $25,000 · OtherWASHINGTON ASSOCIATION FOR COMMUNITY HEALTH — $15,000 · OtherCITY OF TOPPENISH — $13,709 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON — $10,762 · OtherSUNRISE OUTREACH CENTER OF YAKIMA — $15,000 · Other+1 more — $5,000 · OtherYAKIMA VALLEY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $150,000 · PhilanthropyTOPPENISH COMMUNITY CHEST — $44,374 · Food & NutritionCENTRAL WASHINGTON FAIR ASSOCIATION — $36,000 · Recreation & SportsJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF WASHINGTON — $25,000 · International
Human Services$85,000,000Health$19,510,047Other$257,471Philanthropy$150,000Food & Nutrition$44,374Recreation & Sports$36,000International$25,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetAGENA — $85,000,000 over 6y, 96% of budgetYVFWC HEALTHCARE FACILITIES DEVELOPMENT II — $14,001,005 over 1y, 100% of budgetYVFWC HEALTHCARE FACILITIES DEVELOPMENT — $4,178,556 over 1y, 42% of budgetTHE MEMORIAL FOUNDATION — $1,095,124 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetYAKIMA VALLEY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $150,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetGrace City Outreach — $108,000 over 2y, 8.6% of budgetYAKIMA VALLEY COUNCIL ON ALCOHOLISM — $100,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetADVOCATES FOR COMMUNITY HEALTH INC — $100,000 over 1y, 5.5% of budgetTOPPENISH COMMUNITY CHEST — $44,374 over 3y, 29% of budgetUNION GOSPEL MISSION OF YAKIMA WASH — $40,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCENTRAL WASHINGTON FAIR ASSOCIATION — $36,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetCLINICA MEDICAL NUESTRA SENORA DE GUADALUPE — $30,000 over 1y, 8.1% of budgetAREA HEALTH EDUCATION CENTER OF SOUTHWEST OREGON — $25,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF WASHINGTON — $25,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetSUNRISE OUTREACH CENTER OF YAKIMA — $15,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSpokane District Dental Society Foundation — $5,362 over 1y, 14% of budgetWASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Yakima Valley Community FoundationWA19.9× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Yakima Valley Community Foundation · Seattle Foundation · United Way of Central Washington · Delta Dental of Washington · Northwest Harvest Emm · Bnsf Railway Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Baird Foundation Inc · Network for Good · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Yakima Valley Farm Workers Clinic funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 7%
  • Clinica Medical Nuestra Senora De Guadalupe7% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph