Skip to content

Pennsylvania · Nonprofit

WOMEN FOR A HEALTHY ENVIRONMENT

WOMEN FOR A HEALTHY ENVIRONMENT (Pennsylvania) receives grants from 21 organizations whose IRS filings report $4,410,083 to it, the largest being THE HEINZ ENDOWMENTS ($2,694,500). 16 of them have funded it in more than one year.

Revenue FY2025
$1.8M
Funders on record
21
Grants received
$4.4M
Net assets
$683k
16/21 repeat fundersgrants exceed reported revenue in one year
01What it does

What Women for a Healthy Environment does

Mission

Women for a Healthy Environment uses a scientific approach to achieve equitable lives free of environmental hazards through advocacy and community-based programs.

As stated on its FY2025 Form 990.

Programs

  1. Healthy homes: the environmental protection agency (epa) reports americans spend about 90% of their time indoors. A significant amount of that time is spent in our homes, so these places should be as healthy as possible. Women for a Healthy Environment (whe) educates community members about the many potential environmental risk factors in and around the home (such as lead, radon, mold, poor air quality, pesticide exposure, and the array of toxics found in consumer products) that impact public health. As part of our outreach, programming and technical assistance, staff provide information on reducing exposure to environmental harms. See additional information on schedule o.children are our most vulnerable population. Pound for pound children breathe more air, drink more water and consume more food than adults. Therefore, whe offers solutions for creating a healthy and safe home environment for families, with an emphasis on working in disinvested communities. This programming engages families visiting social service and health care agencies with tools, information and resources that focus on creating a green and healthy home environment. The workshops and online materials educate…

    $1,596,996 spent$92,982 earned by the program
    63% of program spending
  2. Healthy schools: whe's healthy schools program works closely with the school community, including administrators, staff (school nurses, facility directors, food service directors), teachers and parents, to identify and remediate environmental risks in schools across southwestern pa. We provide information, support, and hands-on expertise so that children can thrive and learn in healthy, toxic-free settings. Whether a school district is renovating a school, building a new facility, or maintaining existing buildings, many environmental factors contribute to negative health impacts. See additional information on schedule o.technical assistance: the 1000 hours a year program supports schools and early learning centers that wish to test and remediate for lead (pb) and radon, two known, yet preventable, environmental hazards in learning environments that impact public health. Four school districts received ongoing indoor air quality monitoring and follow-up recommendations. Fourteen school buildings were given 33 filtered water fountain/bottle filler upgrades (six districts and four standalone schools). Six water fountain upgrades were given to after school programs. In addition,…

    $373,971 spent
    15% of program spending
  3. Healthy early learning centers: the american academy of pediatrics' council on environmental health has stated that "those who care for children (childcare staff, parents or guardians, physicians, schools) should make every effort to minimize the negative health and developmental effects of toxin exposure. During infancy, children often explore their environment on the floor, exposing themselves to potentially harmful pollutants brought indoors from outside, cleaning products used on floor surfaces, and pesticides used on outdoor grounds. See additional information on schedule o.through stages of development, infants and toddlers frequently place objects in their mouths further increasing exposures. They have higher respiratory and metabolic rates, as well as an immature blood/brain barrier and immune system. Caregivers must take precautions, become informed about environmental hazards, and make efforts to reduce or eliminate certain toxins in their environments." through whe's healthy early learning program staff provides technical assistance focused on creating a healthy environment for the youngest population, infants and children. Through a combination of mini-grants,…

    $320,088 spentof which $191,504 as grants
    13% of program spending
  4. Coalition get the lead (pb) out, pittsburgh campaign and lead safe allegheny coalition: during early 2018, whe staff convened a group of nonprofits and academic researchers interested in focusing on lead exposure, including strategies that address primary prevention and early intervention. This led to the creation of a countywide coalition, including participation from government agencies and healthcare providers to nonprofits, that have a common goal of developing strategies and resources to reduce the number of children with elevated blood lead levels. In fy 25, whe also was the recipient of a cdc childhood lead poisoning prevention grant that also supports this work. The goal of that grant is to increase the number of children screened for lead and the number of home investigations that occur when a child is diagnosed with an elevated blood lead level. This past fiscal year, the coalition worked within allegheny county to provide leadership and advocacy that advances strategic initiatives and fosters collaboration among the community by focusing on primary prevention and ultimately creating a lead safe environment. The coalition advocates to ensure we maintain public vigilance…

    $257,628 spent$3,570 earned by the program
    10% of program spending

The 4 programs described on its FY2024 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $2,548,683.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($933k) Expenses 100 ($466k) Net assets 100 ($972k)2018 Revenue 62 ($580k) Expenses 173 ($806k) Net assets 77 ($746k)2019 Revenue 64 ($601k) Expenses 184 ($860k) Net assets 78 ($760k)2020 Revenue 136 ($1.3M) Expenses 189 ($880k) Net assets 118 ($1.1M)2021 Revenue 76 ($710k) Expenses 212 ($987k) Net assets 89 ($869k)2022 Revenue 216 ($2.0M) Expenses 238 ($1.1M) Net assets 183 ($1.8M)2023 Revenue 84 ($782k) Expenses 281 ($1.3M) Net assets 129 ($1.2M)2024 Revenue 248 ($2.3M) Expenses 388 ($1.8M) Net assets 180 ($1.8M)2025 Revenue 193 ($1.8M) Expenses 616 ($2.9M) Net assets 70 ($683k)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Revenue (193)Expenses (616)Net assets (70)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2024 to 2025, from $2.1M to $1.1M (−45%).

$994k
$825k
$849k
$1.2M
$990k
$1.9M
$1.3M
$2.1M
$1.1M
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2017 0% · 2018 5% · 2019 5% · 2020 4% · 2021 40% · 2022 14% · 2023 29% · 2024 21% · 2025 63%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

94% of WOMEN FOR A HEALTHY ENVIRONMENT’s revenue is contributions — more donation-reliant than the typical peer (88% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 2,293 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 5 of the last 9 reported years ran a deficit.

$466k
’17
−$226k
’18
−$259k
’19
$385k
’20
−$277k
’21
$907k
’22
−$527k
’23
$504k
’24
−$1.1M
’25
2.9
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

Chief executive

Michelle Naccarati-Chapkis

Executive director

Board chair

Tracey Conti

Chair

As listed on its FY2025 Form 990.

'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Listed151619172016131518
Joined·+2+4+0+4+4+0+8+4
No longer listed·11218361
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 5 funders to 9 funders, grant income rose $139k → $852k.

5 of 21 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 11% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of WOMEN FOR A HEALTHY ENVIRONMENT’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

WOMEN FOR A HEALTHY ENVIRONMENT leans on a few funders — its largest provides 61% of grant income and the top three 75%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

61%
largest funder
75%
top three
~3
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 51% · 2018 56% · 2019 44% · 2020 66% · 2021 76% · 2022 62% · 2023 67% — growing more concentrated.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

54% of WOMEN FOR A HEALTHY ENVIRONMENT's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 76% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y+3y+4y+5y+6y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

98% of WOMEN FOR A HEALTHY ENVIRONMENT's grant income comes from Pennsylvania funders.

MI
PA

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’17
’18
’19
’20
’21
’22
’23
Pennsylvania out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $492k arriving through sponsors registered in 3 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

WOMEN FOR A HEALTHY ENVIRONMENT's funding base is broadening — from 5 funders to 9 as grant income climbed.

Operating margin−59% · bottom quartile
Months of reserve2.9mo · below the median
Revenue growth (annualized)9% · below the median

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 1,074 environment nonprofits $1M–$10M, FY2025

Government funding WOMEN FOR A HEALTHY ENVIRONMENT receives

Grants and contracts to this organization from federal (USASpending) and state checkbooks, reconciled to its EIN. $2.8M on record.

Federal$2.8M
grants $2.8Mcontracts $0
17
22
23
24
25
Top agencies
  • Department of Housing and Urban Development$1.9M
  • Department of Health and Human Services$573k
  • Environmental Protection Agency$330k

Federal grants vs contracts are distinguished; state line items keep their reported category. Matched by name + geography (the BMF), so coverage is partial and precision-first.

Organizations like WOMEN FOR A HEALTHY ENVIRONMENT

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Pennsylvania

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

89% of spending goes to programs.

Program 89%Management 5%Fundraising 6%

Governance

15
board members
100%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy✓Whistleblower policy✓Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990✓Audited financials

Public support

56%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

PA

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for WOMEN FOR A HEALTHY ENVIRONMENT: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds WOMEN FOR A HEALTHY ENVIRONMENT?
WOMEN FOR A HEALTHY ENVIRONMENT (Pennsylvania) receives grants from 21 organizations whose IRS filings report $4,410,083 to it, the largest being THE HEINZ ENDOWMENTS ($2,694,500). 16 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does WOMEN FOR A HEALTHY ENVIRONMENT have?
IRS filings report 21 organizations giving $4,410,083 in grants to WOMEN FOR A HEALTHY ENVIRONMENT, 16 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of WOMEN FOR A HEALTHY ENVIRONMENT?
THE HEINZ ENDOWMENTS is the largest funder on record, with $2,694,500 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like WOMEN FOR A HEALTHY ENVIRONMENT find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Pennsylvania. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 21 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing