Skip to content

Pennsylvania · Public charity

Women for a Healthy Environment

WOMEN FOR A HEALTHY ENVIRONMENT uses a scientific approach to achieve equitable lives free of environmental hazards through advocacy and community-based programs.

$192k
Granted FY2025(still arriving)
12
Itemized grants FY2025
7
Organizations funded FY2024
71%
First-time grantees FY2024
Read the full brief
Itemized, FY2025
$156k
The rest is grants the schedule does not break out
Median grant, FY2025
$11,250
Largest grant, FY2025
$36,685
Organizations funded a year
2 to 22
FY2018 to FY2024
States reached, FY2025
1
Total assets, FY2025
$1.1M

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2024, 71% of the organizations Women for a Healthy Environment funded were first-time grantees, receiving 79% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 21% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $71k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
EnvironmentCommunity ImprovementEducationHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2025still arriving12$156k83%
FY20247$89k71%
FY202311$116k91%
FY202210$79k50%
FY202112$132k58%
FY20202$28k50%
FY201922$298k91%
FY201810$98kn/a
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Environment$516kHealth$352kEducation$43kHuman Services$43kCommunity Improvement$31kHousing & Shelter$11k

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2018 to FY2025, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Avonworth School District$36,6851n/a
Woodland Hills School District$35,3461n/a
Allegheny Intermediate Unit$35,3322n/a
North Hills Sd$30,8483n/a
Pennenvironment Research & Policy Center Inc$30,75031%
Clean Water Fund$30,75030%
Pittsburgh United$30,75031%
Alliance for Infants & Toddlers$30,7503n/a
Indiana Area School District$26,4052n/a
Pine-Richland Sd$24,8751n/a
Show all 68 grantees
All grantees of Women for a Healthy Environment by total granted
GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Avonworth School District$36,6851n/a
Woodland Hills School District$35,3461n/a
Allegheny Intermediate Unit$35,3322n/a
North Hills Sd$30,8483n/a
Pennenvironment Research & Policy Center Inc$30,75031%
Clean Water Fund$30,75030%
Pittsburgh United$30,75031%
Alliance for Infants & Toddlers$30,7503n/a
Indiana Area School District$26,4052n/a
Pine-Richland Sd$24,8751n/a
Peace Love and Learning$23,3342n/a
Connellsville Area School District$21,9021n/a
West Mifflin Area School District$21,4133n/a
Kiski Area School District$21,0472n/a
Ingomar United Methodist Church$20,7902n/a
1st Years Daycare$20,0361n/a
Grounded Strategies$18,75021%
McCoy's Learning Center LLC$18,5331n/a
Childcare Network Inc$17,8091n/a
Ryan's Room Childcare$17,4501n/a
Hopewell Area School District$16,9981n/a
Deakings Daycare LLC$16,0371n/a
Moon Area School District$15,6061n/a
Deer Lakes School District$15,5221n/a
Young Men's Christian Association of Greater Pittsburgh$15,25810%
Bethlehem-Center School District$15,1141n/a
Pamela Butler's Babies$14,1781n/a
Norwin Pennsylvania School Service Personnel Assoc$14,1421n/a
Riverview Sd$13,1741n/a
Sunrise School$12,8571n/a
Chartiers Valley School District$12,6901n/a
Penn Trafford School District$12,6831n/a
Fifth Avenue Family Daycare$12,2561n/a
Upper St Clair Sd$12,1381n/a
Conservation Consultants Inc$12,00010%
Doris Keith-Clark Early Education Center$11,9661n/a
Greensburg Salem Education Foundation$11,86017%
Steel Valley School District$11,8221n/a
Southmoreland School District$11,3781n/a
The Tots Spot LLC$11,2501n/a
Rebuilding Together Pittsburgh$11,25010%
Teenie Tots Childcare Center$10,8631n/a
Miss Sheree's Family Home Daycare$10,4921n/a
Butler Area School District$9,7761n/a
Riverview Childrens Center$9,15310%
Plum Borough School District$9,1251n/a
Gwenny Pooh's Daycare$9,0401n/a
Clairton City School District$8,9931n/a
Canon-McMillan School District$8,8751n/a
Little Hearts Learning Center$8,4331n/a
Union Christian Academy$7,9801n/a
Blessed Assurance$7,8601n/a
Penn Hills School District$7,8401n/a
Oil City Area School District$7,7921n/a
Allegheny-Clarion Valley Sd$7,6631n/a
Carol Leone's Child Care$7,4451n/a
New Brighton Area School District$6,9431n/a
South Allegheny School District$6,8301n/a
Charmaine Dunbar Family Childcare$6,6981n/a
Keystone Oaks School District$6,0581n/a
Bentworth School District$5,9901n/a
A S Wee Careeric Young Child Care$5,9851n/a
Cornerstone Child Care Inc$5,8731n/a
Duquesne City School District$5,6001n/a
Learning to Learn$5,5001n/a
Growing Garden$5,4751n/a
Kelly's Kingdom$5,3451n/a
Taylors Tots$5,3301n/a

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget Women for a Healthy Environment supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPennenvironment Research & Policy Center Inc: $30,750 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetClean Water Fund: $30,750 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetPittsburgh United: $30,750 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetGrounded Strategies: $18,750 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetYoung Men's Christian Association of Greater Pittsburgh: $15,258 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetConservation Consultants Inc: $12,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetGreensburg Salem Education Foundation: $11,860 over 1y, 6.9% of budgetRebuilding Together Pittsburgh: $11,250 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetRiverview Childrens Center: $9,153 over 1y, 0.2% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 9.

Nonprofits that may fit its grantmaking

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Pittsburgh FoundationPA29.4× affinity16 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Pittsburgh Foundation · The Grable Foundation · Project Lead the Way Inc · Share Our Strength · The Heinz Endowments · McAuley Ministries · Jefferson Regional Foundation · Richard King Mellon Foundation · Project Lead the Way Inc · Tickets for Kids Foundation · Invest Pgh Inc · The Buhl Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Women for a Healthy Environment with peer funders

About Women for a Healthy Environment

How much does Women for a Healthy Environment give?
Women for a Healthy Environment reported 12 itemized grants totaling $155,617, out of $191,504 in total grant expense reported on the return in its FY2025 IRS filing. It funded between 2 and 22 organizations a year over FY2018 to FY2024.
What does Women for a Healthy Environment fund?
By grant dollars over FY2018 to FY2025, its largest causes are Environment (52%), Health (35%), Education (4%).
Who are Women for a Healthy Environment's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2018 to FY2025: Avonworth School District ($37k), Woodland Hills School District ($35k), Allegheny Intermediate Unit ($35k).
Does Women for a Healthy Environment fund new organizations?
In FY2024, 71% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Which funders back the same organizations as Women for a Healthy Environment?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include The Pittsburgh Foundation, The Grable Foundation, Project Lead the Way Inc.
Where is Women for a Healthy Environment based?
Women for a Healthy Environment is based in PA.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 68 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Women for a Healthy Environment’s filings →

More from the funding graph