How much did NONPROFIT PARTNERS INC grant in FY2025?

NONPROFIT PARTNERS INC reported 44 grants totaling $1,913,816 in its FY2025 IRS filing.

Where is NONPROFIT PARTNERS INC based?

NONPROFIT PARTNERS INC is based in PA.

NONPROFIT PARTNERS INC

Foundation Dossiers

· Community foundation

NONPROFIT PARTNERS INC

The mission of nonprofit partners is to provide charitable organizations and individuals who want to support nonprofits, grassroots projects, and large-scale initiatives the support and capacity to work for community good.

$1.9M

Granted FY2025

Grants

Communities

$91k

Largest

01What you fund

01FY2025 · 44 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

Under $10k1 grant · $7k
$10k–50k24 grants · $606k
$50k–250k19 grants · $1.3M

$40,000

Median grant

States reached

$11M

Total assets

Largest grants

PHYSICIANS FOR SOCIAL RESPONSIBILIT$91,000
CENTER FOR COALFIELD JUSTICE$86,000
THREE RIVERS WATERKEEPER INC$81,000
BUCKEYE ENVIRONMENTAL NETWORK$75,000
WEST VIRGINIA CITIZEN ACTION EDUCAT$75,000
CITIZENS' ENVIRONMENTAL ASSOCIATION$75,000
FRIENDS OF BLACKWATER INC$75,000
BLACK WOMEN RISING INC$75,000
BEAVER COUNTY MARCELLUS AWARENESS C$74,539
PROTECT PT$70,500
GROUP AGAINST SMOG AND POLLUTION I$70,000
CITIZENS COAL COUNCIL$64,000
WOMEN FOR A HEALTHY ENVIRONMENT$60,250
VALLEY CLEAN AIR NOW (VCAN)$60,250
FACT-FAITH COMMUNITIES TOGETHER FOR$60,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY25–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 14% — the area typically sits at 10%. 81% of your dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Central Pennsylvania Conservancy Inc

The mission of Central Pennsylvania Conservancy (CPC) is to acquire, preserve, and protect local land and natural resources in a five-county, South-Central PA region.

Environment

Appalachian Voices

Appalachian voices brings people together to protect the land, air, and water of central and southern appalachia and advance a just transition to a generative and equitable clean energy economy.

Environment

Pa Assoc

Promote soil & water conservation programs of pennsylvania's conservation districts

—

Chester Ridley Crum Watersheds

to support, encourage and promote the enjoyment, restoration, conservation, protection and prudent management of the natural resources of the Chester, Ridley, and Crum Watersheds

—

Allegheny County Conservation District

The Allegheny County Conservation District is an urban conservation district that engages and leads through partnerships, innovation, and implementation to conserve, promote, and improve Allegheny Countys natural resources.

Environment

Confluence Environmental Center

Confluence Environmental Center's mission is to bring together streams of thought, action and people to make the environmental movement more robust, inclusive and effective. We launched operations in September of 2011 as a project of the…

Environment

Black River Environmental Improvement

To conserve, maintain, and enhance the scenic, historical, wilderness wildlife, open space, and outdoor recreation values of the adirondack and tug hill areas.

Philanthropy

California Environmental Justice Alliance

Our mission is to fight against fossil fuel executives and industries that have turned our communities into dumping grounds for toxic waste, poisoning our air, water, lan, and bodies. We organize to oppose giant oil refineries, dirty…

Environment

Environmental Law Institute

To advance effective law and governance systems for environmental protection by providing information, publications, training courses, seminars, research and policy recommendations in a manner that engages and empowers leaders and…

Environment

Earthworks

Protect communities and the environment from the adverse impacts of mineral & energy development

Public Benefit

The Clearwater Conservancy of

To conserve and restore the natural resources through land conservation, water resources stewardship and environmental outreach across central pennsylvania.

Environment

Pennsylvania Organization for Watersheds

Pennsylvania organization for watersheds and rivers (powr) provides the tools, training, education and resources that empower community watershed organization leaders and volunteers to protect and restore rivers and streams, advocate for…

Environment

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Women for a Healthy Environment and the most unlike its peers is Tides Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side

Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 13 years old; the field is 19. You back the younger end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 20% of your grantees by number, and just 18% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 8% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

0.0%0/42

the rest of the field

6,105/78,120

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

03the grantee network

34 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

34/34

Grantees still filing

26/34

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Environment$1,066,339Other$405,977Community Improvement$120,500Education$115,000Health$91,000Civil Rights$75,000Crime & Legal$40,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Heinz EndowmentsPA31.9× affinity13 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Heinz Endowments · Community Foundation of Greater · The Pittsburgh Foundation · United States Energy Foundation · The New World Foundation · Patagoniaorg · Resources Legacy Fund · Tides Foundation · Rockefeller Family Fund Inc · The Schmidt Family Foundation · Rockefeller Philanthropy Advisors Inc · Sierra Club

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation NONPROFIT PARTNERS INC funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

04Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: PHYSICIANS FOR SOCIAL RESPONSIBILIT.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

low risk

~16 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 7 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

7 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up 3.1× since.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 232153775 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on PHYSICIANS FOR SOCIAL RESPONSIBILIT, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 16 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2025; revenue grew over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 13% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Nonprofit Partners Inc?

Find your warmest path to Nonprofit Partners Inc through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

NONPROFIT PARTNERS INC

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

34 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Nonprofit Partners Inc?

More from the funding graph

NONPROFIT PARTNERS INC

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

34 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Nonprofit Partners Inc?

More from the funding graph