Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Public charity

McAuley Ministries

We, pittsburgh mercy health system and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities.

$4.4M
Granted FY2025still arriving
55
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$667k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.

Community Improvement$8.2MEducation$6.6MHousing & Shelter$5.9MHuman Services$4.7MHealth$4.6MYouth Development$3.3MEmployment$1.2MArts & Culture$1.1MOther$0
02FY2025 · 55 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $20k
  • $10k–50k13 grants · $305k
  • $50k–250k37 grants · $3.2M
  • $250k+2 grants · $917k
$51,250
Median grant
3
States reached
$85M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NEIGHBORHOOD ALLIES$666,667
CITIZEN SCIENCE LAB$250,000
CENTER THAT CARES$204,000
UJAMAA COLLECTIVE$153,000
MACEDONIA FAMILY AND COMMUNITY ENRICHMENT CENTER$150,400
A SCHOOLS PITTSBURGHS COMMUNITY ALLIANCE FOR PUBLIC EDUCATION$142,400
MERCY LIFE CENTER CORPORATION$135,918
READING IS FUNDAMENTAL PITTSBURGH$127,500
AMANI CHRISTIAN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION$117,300
REBUILDING TOGETHER PITTSBURGH$117,300
SHEPHERD'S HEART FELLOWSHIP$117,300
ACH CLEAR PATHWAYS$107,000
EBENEZER OUTREACH MINISTRIES$102,000
SCHENLEY HEIGHTS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM$102,000
GROUNDED STRATEGIES$102,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $8.0M) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 99% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%SMALL SEEDS DEVELOPMENT INC: $102k → 11%SMALL SEEDS DEVELOPMENT INC: $77k → 11%SMALL SEEDS DEVELOPMENT INC: $77k → 11%YMCA OF GREATER PITTSBURGH: $400k → 11%EBENEZER OUTREACH MINISTRIES: $102k → 11%BLACK POLITICAL EMPOWERMENT PROJECT (B-PEP): $100k → 11%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE DIOCESE OF PITTSBURGH INC: $195k → 11%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE DIOCESE OF PITTSBURGH: $104k → 11%YMCA OF GREATER PITTSBURGH: $81k → 11%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE DIOCESE OF PGH: $75k → 11%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE DIOCESE OF PGH: $65k → 11%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE DIOCESE OF PITTSBURGH INC: $51k → 11%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE DIOCESE OF PITTSBURGH INC: $51k → 11%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE DIOCESE OF PITTSBURGH INC: $51k → 11%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE DIOCESE OF PITTSBURGH INC: $50k → 11%CITIZEN SCIENCE LAB: $250k → 11%CITIZEN SCIENCE LAB: $250k → 11%BETHLEHEM HAVEN OF PITTSBURGH: $1.0M → 11%JUBILEE ASSOCIATION INC: $500k → 11%WOMANSPACE-EAST INC: $287k → 11%WOMANSPACE-EAST INC: $213k → 11%CENTER THAT CARES: $204k → 11%BETHLEHEM HAVEN OF PITTSBURGH: $200k → 11%CENTER THAT CARES: $173k → 11%CENTER THAT CARES: $173k → 11%EBENEZER OUTREACH MINISTRIES: $150k → 11%CENTER THAT CARES: $150k → 11%CENTER THAT CARES: $145k → 11%FOCUS NORTH AMERICA FOR FOCUS PITTSBURGH: $141k → 11%FOCUS NORTH AMERICA FOR FOCUS PITTSBURGH: $136k → 11%CENTER THAT CARES: $130k → 11%CENTER THAT CARES: $120k → 11%CENTER THAT CARES: $110k → 11%EBENEZER OUTREACH MINISTRIES: $102k → 11%BLIND AND VISION REHABILITATION SERVICES OF PITTSBURGH: $102k → 11%CENTER THAT CARES: $100k → 11%BETHLEHEM HAVEN OF PITTSBURGH: $100k → 11%YMCA OF GREATER PITTSBURGH: $76k → 11%ACCULTURATION FOR JUSTICE ACCESS & PEACE OUTREACH (AJAPO): $65k → 11%ACCULTURATION FOR JUSTICE ACCESS & PEACE OUTREACH: $61k → 11%ACCULTURATION FOR JUSTICE ACCESS & PEACE OUTREACH (AJAPO): $60k → 11%THELMA LOVETTE YMCA: $53k → 11%THELMA LOVETTE YMCA: $51k → 11%BLACK POLITICAL EMPOWERMENT PROJECT: $51k → 11%PITTSBURGH GREEN INNOVATORS INC: $50k → 11%BLACK POLITICAL EMPOWERMENT PROJECT: $50k → 11%THE CITIZEN SCIENCE LAB: $50k → 11%FOCUS NORTH AMERICA: $136k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

IL
NY
MA
OR
IA
PA
KY
WV
VA
MD
NC
DC
HI
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 11% of McAuley Ministries’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 99% of the giving stays in PA; read by stated purpose it is 86% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

McAuley Ministrieslessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 3.7% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$39M · 91 repeat orgs$1.4M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +24% since the first grant, against +10% for the ones you funded once.

91 repeat relationships — 48 still active in FY2025, 43 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

91
38

Total granted

$39M
$1.2M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+24%
+10%

Still filing today

85%
66%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $202k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationCommunity ImprovementHealthPhilanthropyArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CU
    CARLOW UNIVERSITY
    8× · 2017–2024 · $2.7M · revenue +65%
  • ML
    MERCY LIFE CENTER CORPORATION
    2× · 2020–2025 · $2.6M · revenue +8%
  • NA
    NEIGHBORHOOD ALLIES INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $2.5M · revenue +111%

Funded once

  • CT
    CATHERINE TERRACE LLC
    one grant, 2022 · $226k
  • FH
    FOOD HELPERS
    one grant, 2023 · $130k · revenue -7%
  • PG
    PITTSBURGH GREEN INNOVATORS INC
    one grant, 2022 · $50k · revenue -67%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Pittsburgh Council On Higher Education

To provide a means for sharing resources and information among members, engage in joint projects, and offer a common voice on educational matters.

Education
2
Sustainable Pittsburgh

Provide information to decision maker in the pittsburgh region to promote economic prosperity, social equity, and environmental quality for sustainable solutions for communities and businesses.

Environment
3
Point Park University

Provides innovative education in a dynamic urban setting. dedicated to academic excellence and community engagement,we prepare students of diverse backgrounds with the knowledge, skill,and experience to lead meaningful lives as informed…

—
4
Prevention Point Pittsburgh

To provide health empowerment services to injection drug users and prevent the spread of hiv.

Health
5
Pittsburgh Housing Development Corp

To initiate, plan, finance, develop and manage housing development in the City of Pittsburgh, and upon request, in other municipalities with particular, but not exclusive, emphasis on such development in low to moderate income census…

Housing & Shelter
6
Philadelphia Industrial Development Corporation

Pidc plans and implements economic development initiatives (see schedule o) which enhance the competitive environment, generate jobs and produce higher tax ratables throughout philadelphia.

Community Improvement
7
Pittsburgh Business Group On Health

An employer-led coalition that champions outcomes-based, cost-effective healthcare through education, market expertise, group purchasing, comparative data and decision support.

—
8
Pittsburgh Food Policy Council

The mission of the pittsburgh food policy council is to build a food system that benefits our communities, economy, and environment in ways that are just, equitable and sustainable. driven by community-led solutions, we bring together over…

Food & Nutrition
9
Pittsburgh Community Broadcasting Corporation

To create and distribute trusted content, build connections and strengthen our community through public media.

Arts & Culture
10
World Affairs Council of Pittsburgh

The world affairs council of pittsburgh's mission is to convene and connect people around global issues to build a competitive, thriving, and inclusive pittsburgh.

International
11
Pittsburgh United

Pittsburgh United, Inc. strives to advance social & economic justice in the

Community Improvement
12
Philadelphia Works Inc

Philadelphia works, inc. develops and manages smart workforce solutions that respond to business needs and increases economic opportunity for all philadelphia residents.

Employment

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Urban League of Greater Pittsburgh and the most unlike its peers is The Early Excellence Project. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyFaith-Based Educational Ins…Community Equity Organizati…Early Childhood Care CentersSenior Affordable HousingYouth Development and Workf…Parks and Land ConservationPittsburgh Regional Develop…Youth Sports LeaguesDisability Services Organiz…Poverty & Crisis Support Se…Performing Arts Organizatio…Regional Arts OrganizationsCharter and Independent Sch…Industry Trade AssociationsHealthcare Philanthropy & I…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 28 years old; the field is 20. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number16%7%<5yr12%10%5–10yr19%18%10–20yr21%21%20–35yr16%21%35–55yr16%23%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value16%5%<5yr12%9%5–10yr19%14%10–20yr21%14%20–35yr16%35%35–55yr16%23%55yr+

The field is 16% startups (under 5 years old) — 7% of your grantees by number, and just 5% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 3% lost their exemption, against 8% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
3%4/140
the rest of the field
8%
761/9,766

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

122 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 122 of the 142 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

15
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
30
Early backer (in before they grew)
114/122
Grantees still filing
75/122
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

THE CENTER THAT CARES — $1,305,800 · Human ServicesTHE CENTER THAT CARESBETHLEHEM HAVEN OF PITTSBURGH — $1,300,000 · Human ServicesBETHLEHEM HAVEN OF PI…YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER PITTSBURGH — $790,300 · Human ServicesYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN…CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE DIOCESE OF PGH — $641,522 · Human ServicesCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF…JUBILEE ASSOCIATION INC — $641,000 · Human ServicesJUBILEE ASSOCIATION I…THE CITIZEN SCIENCE LAB — $635,000 · Human ServicesTHE CITIZEN SCIENCE L…WOMANSPACE EAST INC — $500,000 · Human ServicesWOMANSPACE EAST INCSmall Seeds Development Inc — $430,000 · Human ServicesSmall Seeds Developme…FOCUS NORTH AMERICA — $413,000 · Human ServicesEBENEZER OUTREACH MINISTRIES — $354,144 · Human Services+12 more — $1,041,100 · Human Services+12 moreHILL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $1,558,740 · OtherHILL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORP…HILL HOUSE ASSOCIATION — $939,944 · OtherHILL HOUSE ASSOCIATIONSCHENLEY HEIGHTS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM — $886,500 · OtherSCHENLEY HEIGHTS COMMUNITY DEVE…SHEPHERDS HEART FELLOWSHIP & MINISTRIES — $809,260 · OtherSHEPHERDS HEART FELLOWSHIP & MI…HILL DISTRICT FEDERAL CRED — $500,000 · OtherACH Clear Pathways — $870,000 · OtherACH Clear Pathways+65 more — $6,058,733 · Other+65 moreNEIGHBORHOOD ALLIES INC — $2,520,001 · Community ImprovementNEIGHBORHOOD ALLI…MACEDONIA FAMILY AND COMMUNITY ENRICHMENT CENTER INC — $1,050,680 · Community ImprovementMACEDONIA FAMILY …NEIGHBORHOOD RESILIENCE PROJECT — $1,029,300 · Community ImprovementNEIGHBORHOOD RESI…UPTOWN PARTNERS OF PITTSBURGH — $615,348 · Community ImprovementUPTOWN PARTNERS O…HILL DISTRICT CONSENSUS GROUP — $524,780 · Community ImprovementHILL DISTRICT CON…UJAMAA COLLECTIVE — $240,500 · Community Improvement+3 more — $398,000 · Community Improvement+3 moreCARLOW UNIVERSITY — $2,662,440 · EducationCARLOW UNIVERSI…READING IS FUNDAMENTAL PITTSBURGH — $965,000 · EducationREADING IS FUND…THE EARLY EXCELLENCE PROJECT — $583,700 · EducationTHE EARLY EXCEL…Hug Me Tight Childlife Centers Inc — $459,400 · EducationHug Me Tight Ch…THE PITTSBURGH CONTINGENCY INC — $269,200 · EducationA SCHOOLS PITTSBURGH'S COMMUNITY ALLIANCE FOR PUBLIC EDUCATION — $233,400 · Education+11 more — $463,735 · Education+11 moreMERCY LIFE CENTER CORPORATION — $2,635,918 · HealthMERCY LIFE CE…PITTSBURGH MERCY HEALTH SYSTEM INC — $1,470,073 · HealthPITTSBURGH ME…PROGRAM TO AID CITIZEN ENTERPRISE INC — $590,140 · HealthPROGRAM TO AI…+4 more — $65,400 · HealthREBUILDING TOGETHER PITTSBURGH — $1,479,300 · Housing & ShelterOAKLAND PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $1,101,000 · Housing & ShelterSISTERS PLACE INC — $358,100 · Housing & ShelterALLEGHENY COUNCIL TO IMPROVE OUR NEIGHBORHOODS-HOUSING INCORPORATED — $137,000 · Housing & Shelter+1 more — $7,500 · Housing & ShelterTHE UNITED WAY OF SOUTHWESTERN PENNSYLVANIA — $800,400 · PhilanthropyAmani Christian Comm Dev Corp — $331,300 · PhilanthropyTHE PITTSBURGH PROMISE FOUNDATION — $203,000 · PhilanthropyTHE PITTSBURGH FOUNDATION — $200,000 · PhilanthropyPOISE FOUNDATION — $197,850 · Philanthropy+6 more — $213,400 · Philanthropy
Human Services$8,051,866Other$11,623,177Community Improvement$6,378,609Education$5,636,875Health$4,761,531Housing & Shelter$3,082,900Philanthropy$1,945,950

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCARLOW UNIVERSITY — $2,662,440 over 8y, 3.1% of budgetMERCY LIFE CENTER CORPORATION — $2,635,918 over 2y, 2.5% of budgetNEIGHBORHOOD ALLIES INC — $2,520,001 over 9y, 14% of budgetHILL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $1,558,740 over 6y, 19% of budgetREBUILDING TOGETHER PITTSBURGH — $1,479,300 over 8y, 7.0% of budgetPITTSBURGH MERCY HEALTH SYSTEM INC — $1,470,073 over 8y, 3.8% of budgetTHE CENTER THAT CARES — $1,305,800 over 9y, 10% of budgetBETHLEHEM HAVEN OF PITTSBURGH — $1,300,000 over 3y, 14% of budgetOAKLAND PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $1,101,000 over 7y, 14% of budgetMACEDONIA FAMILY AND COMMUNITY ENRICHMENT CENTER INC — $1,050,680 over 9y, 8.9% of budgetNEIGHBORHOOD RESILIENCE PROJECT — $1,029,300 over 6y, 27% of budgetREADING IS FUNDAMENTAL PITTSBURGH — $965,000 over 9y, 12% of budgetHILL HOUSE ASSOCIATION — $939,944 over 3y, 17% of budgetSCHENLEY HEIGHTS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM — $886,500 over 9y, 36% of budgetACH Clear Pathways — $870,000 over 8y, 22% of budgetTHE UNITED WAY OF SOUTHWESTERN PENNSYLVANIA — $800,400 over 6y, 0.8% of budgetYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER PITTSBURGH — $790,300 over 9y, 1.1% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE DIOCESE OF PGH — $641,522 over 8y, 2.0% of budgetJUBILEE ASSOCIATION INC — $641,000 over 6y, 27% of budgetTHE CITIZEN SCIENCE LAB — $635,000 over 6y, 21% of budgetUPTOWN PARTNERS OF PITTSBURGH — $615,348 over 9y, 51% of budgetPROGRAM TO AID CITIZEN ENTERPRISE INC — $590,140 over 8y, 9.6% of budgetTHE EARLY EXCELLENCE PROJECT — $583,700 over 3y, 44% of budgetHILL DISTRICT CONSENSUS GROUP — $524,780 over 9y, 86% of budgetWOMANSPACE EAST INC — $500,000 over 2y, 28% of budgetHug Me Tight Childlife Centers Inc — $459,400 over 5y, 30% of budgetSmall Seeds Development Inc — $430,000 over 8y, 27% of budgetFOCUS NORTH AMERICA — $413,000 over 3y, 6.0% of budgetNeighborhood Housing Services Inc — $371,001 over 6y, 12% of budgetGROUNDED STRATEGIES — $359,000 over 6y, 25% of budgetSISTERS PLACE INC — $358,100 over 9y, 3.9% of budgetAmani Christian Comm Dev Corp — $331,300 over 3y, 59% of budgetOZANAM INC — $330,813 over 6y, 30% of budgetVISION ENTERPRISES JASON PROJECT — $306,000 over 3y, 97% of budgetVENTURE OUTDOORS INC — $304,000 over 7y, 3.8% of budgetREGIONAL HOUSING LEGAL SERVICES — $284,000 over 5y, 1.9% of budgetTHE PITTSBURGH CONTINGENCY INC — $269,200 over 4y, 3.8% of budgetACCULTURATION FOR JUSTICE ACCESS & PEACE OUTREACH — $256,200 over 7y, 11% of budgetBLACK POLITICAL EMPOWERMENT PROJECT — $252,000 over 5y, 50% of budgetUJAMAA COLLECTIVE — $240,500 over 4y, 9.3% of budgetA SCHOOLS PITTSBURGH'S COMMUNITY ALLIANCE FOR PUBLIC EDUCATION — $233,400 over 3y, 6.6% of budgetM-POWERHOUSE — $227,250 over 5y, 77% of budgetTRAVELERS AID SOCIETY OF PITTSBURGH — $226,500 over 3y, 1.6% of budget412 FOOD RESCUE INC — $217,000 over 7y, 0.6% of budgetENERGY INNOVATION CENTER INSTITUTE INC — $209,820 over 3y, 8.2% of budgetTHE PITTSBURGH PROMISE FOUNDATION — $203,000 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetTRWIB INC — $201,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetTHE PITTSBURGH FOUNDATION — $200,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CARLOW UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds MERCY LIFE CENTER CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds NEIGHBORHOOD ALLIES INC ↗
  • Who funds HILL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds REBUILDING TOGETHER PITTSBURGH ↗
  • Who funds PITTSBURGH MERCY HEALTH SYSTEM INC ↗
  • Who funds THE CENTER THAT CARES ↗
  • Who funds BETHLEHEM HAVEN OF PITTSBURGH ↗
  • Who funds OAKLAND PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds MACEDONIA FAMILY AND COMMUNITY ENRICHMENT CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds NEIGHBORHOOD RESILIENCE PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds READING IS FUNDAMENTAL PITTSBURGH ↗
  • Who funds HILL HOUSE ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds SCHENLEY HEIGHTS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM ↗
  • Who funds ACH Clear Pathways ↗
  • Who funds THE UNITED WAY OF SOUTHWESTERN PENNSYLVANIA ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER PITTSBURGH ↗
  • Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE DIOCESE OF PGH ↗
  • Who funds JUBILEE ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE CITIZEN SCIENCE LAB ↗
  • Who funds UPTOWN PARTNERS OF PITTSBURGH ↗
  • Who funds PROGRAM TO AID CITIZEN ENTERPRISE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE EARLY EXCELLENCE PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds HILL DISTRICT CONSENSUS GROUP ↗
  • Who funds WOMANSPACE EAST INC ↗
  • Who funds Hug Me Tight Childlife Centers Inc ↗
  • Who funds Small Seeds Development Inc ↗
  • Who funds FOCUS NORTH AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds Neighborhood Housing Services Inc ↗
  • Who funds GROUNDED STRATEGIES ↗
  • Who funds SISTERS PLACE INC ↗
  • Who funds EBENEZER OUTREACH MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds Amani Christian Comm Dev Corp ↗
  • Who funds OZANAM INC ↗
  • Who funds VISION ENTERPRISES JASON PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds VENTURE OUTDOORS INC ↗
  • Who funds REGIONAL HOUSING LEGAL SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds THE PITTSBURGH CONTINGENCY INC ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Heinz EndowmentsThe Pittsburgh Founda…Hillman Family Founda…The Grable FoundationRichard King Mellon F…Upmc GroupThe United Way of Sou…Eden Hall FoundationOpportunity FoundationThe Buhl FoundationJefferson Regional Fo…Poise Foundation
The Heinz EndowmentsPA117.1× affinity61 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Heinz Endowments · The Pittsburgh Foundation · Hillman Family Foundations · The Grable Foundation · Richard King Mellon Foundation · Upmc Group · The United Way of Southwestern Pennsylvania · Eden Hall Foundation · Opportunity Foundation · The Buhl Foundation · Jefferson Regional Foundation · Poise Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization McAuley Ministries funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    47report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to McAuley Ministries?

    Find your warmest path to McAuley Ministries through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 142 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home