Skip to content
Plinth
← Funding

Washington, D.C. · Nonprofit

WASHINGTON BACH CONSORT INC

WASHINGTON BACH CONSORT INC (Washington, D.C.) receives grants from 25 organizations whose IRS filings report $1,267,211 to it, the largest being THE MILLSTREAM FUND INC ($500,000). 14 of them have funded it in more than one year.

$1.4M
Revenue FY2025
25
Funders on record
$1.3M
Grants received
$657k
Net assets
14/25 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 17%

Against its field

WASHINGTON BACH CONSORT INC is better cushioned than half of the 2,883 arts & culture nonprofits its size.

Operating margin−11% · bottom quartile
Months of reserve5.3mo · above the median
Revenue growth (annualized)2% · below the median

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 2,883 arts & culture nonprofits $1M–$10M, FY2025

Three funders worth looking at

Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.

See all 12 prospects and why each one surfaced →
01The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($1.2M) Expenses 100 ($974k) Net assets 100 ($869k)2018 Revenue 92 ($1.1M) Expenses 109 ($1.1M) Net assets 100 ($866k)2019 Revenue 113 ($1.3M) Expenses 116 ($1.1M) Net assets 120 ($1.0M)2020 Revenue 87 ($1.0M) Expenses 117 ($1.1M) Net assets 104 ($903k)2021 Revenue 122 ($1.4M) Expenses 92 ($893k) Net assets 172 ($1.5M)2022 Revenue 115 ($1.3M) Expenses 142 ($1.4M) Net assets 166 ($1.4M)2023 Revenue 122 ($1.4M) Expenses 179 ($1.7M) Net assets 128 ($1.1M)2024 Revenue 130 ($1.5M) Expenses 186 ($1.8M) Net assets 93 ($810k)2025 Revenue 119 ($1.4M) Expenses 157 ($1.5M) Net assets 76 ($657k)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Revenue (119)Expenses (157)Net assets (76)Peer revenue range

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2017 15% · 2018 23% · 2019 16% · 2020 18% · 2021 24% · 2022 32% · 2023 29% · 2024 14% · 2025 23%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

80% of WASHINGTON BACH CONSORT INC’s revenue is contributions — more donation-reliant than the typical peer (64% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 5,374 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 6 of the last 9 reported years ran a deficit.

$184k
17
$3k
18
$176k
19
$139k
20
$518k
21
$52k
22
$331k
23
$307k
24
$153k
25
5.3
months of
reserve
02Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 6 funders to 10 funders, grant income rose $82k → $127k.

10 of 25 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF)30% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of WASHINGTON BACH CONSORT INC’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

WASHINGTON BACH CONSORT INC has a broad base — no single funder exceeds 39% of grant income, and it takes 3 funders to reach half.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 3 funders to its left

39% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund WASHINGTON BACH CONSORT INC.

39%
largest funder
58%
top three
~5
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 61% · 2018 57% · 2019 31% · 2020 36% · 2021 41% · 2022 30% · 2023 39%diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

53% of WASHINGTON BACH CONSORT INC's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 56% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y+3y+4y+5y+6y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

WASHINGTON BACH CONSORT INC draws 75% of its grant income from funders outside Washington, D.C., across 8 states in all.

NY
PA
KY
VA
MD
DE
DC
TX

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
Washington, D.C. out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $375k arriving through sponsors registered in 8 statesis excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

03Its place in the field

Funders to approach

Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first. Your 25 funders put you under-funded among the 400 organizations that share them.

From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.

Government funding WASHINGTON BACH CONSORT INC receives

Grants and contracts to this organization from federal (USASpending) and state checkbooks, reconciled to its EIN. $174k on record.

Federal$174k
grants $174kcontracts $0
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
Top agencies
  • National Endowment for the Arts$140k
  • National Endowment for the Humanities$34k

Federal grants vs contracts are distinguished; state line items keep their reported category. Matched by name + geography (the BMF), so coverage is partial and precision-first.

Organizations like WASHINGTON BACH CONSORT INC

Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Washington, D.C.

Nationally

04Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

72% of spending goes to programs.

Program 72%Management 16%Fundraising 12%

Governance

14
board members
100%
independent
Conflict-of-interest policyWhistleblower policyDocument retentionBoard reviewed the 990Audited financials

Public support

98%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

DC

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for WASHINGTON BACH CONSORT INC: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds WASHINGTON BACH CONSORT INC?
WASHINGTON BACH CONSORT INC (Washington, D.C.) receives grants from 25 organizations whose IRS filings report $1,267,211 to it, the largest being THE MILLSTREAM FUND INC ($500,000). 14 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does WASHINGTON BACH CONSORT INC have?
IRS filings report 25 organizations giving $1,267,211 in grants to WASHINGTON BACH CONSORT INC, 14 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of WASHINGTON BACH CONSORT INC?
THE MILLSTREAM FUND INC is the largest funder on record, with $500,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like WASHINGTON BACH CONSORT INC find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Washington, D.C.. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 25funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported August 27, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing