· Private foundation
C E and S Foundation Inc
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k12 grants · $46k
- $10k–50k18 grants · $352k
- $50k–250k26 grants · $2.5M
- $250k+3 grants · $1.7M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| EVOLVE502 SCHOLARS FOUNDATION INC | $1,000,000 |
| BATES COLLEGE | $425,000 |
| JEWISH FAMILY AND CAREER SERVICES | $260,000 |
| PRESIDENT AND FELLOWS OF MIDDLEBURY COLLEGE | $200,000 |
| YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION (YMCA) OF GREATER LOUISVILLE INC | $185,000 |
| RITA JUNE FOUNDATION INC | $150,000 |
| PLAY COUSINS COLLECTIVE | $129,500 |
| MARYHURST | $125,000 |
| THE CABBAGE PATCH SETTLEMENT HOUSE INC | $125,000 |
| NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE INC | $118,200 |
| AMERICANA COMMUNITY CENTER INC | $114,500 |
| COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF LOUISVILLE | $108,180 |
| UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE FOUNDATION INC | $100,000 |
| BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF KENTUCKIANA INC | $100,000 |
| METRO UNITED WAY INC | $95,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $2.7M) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 98% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
63 repeat relationships — 49 still active in FY2024, 14 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $333k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
PRESIDENT AND TRUSTEES OF BATES COLLEGE5× · 2020–2024 · $775k · revenue +44%- TBTHE BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS INC5× · 2020–2024 · $720k · revenue +62%
- TYthe Young Men's Christian Association of Greater Louisville Inc5× · 2020–2024 · $613k · revenue +21%
Funded once
- EIEVOLVE502 INCone grant, 2021 · $1.0M · revenue -42%
- LFLOUISVILLE FREE PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATIOgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $253k · revenue +169%
- UOUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MISSISSIPPI FOUNDATIONgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $200k · revenue +45%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…
To improve the quality of life for all kentuckians through research, education and advocacy on important policy issues facing the commonwealth.
Broadens the perspectives of current and emerging leaders through experiential education that inspires them to advance kentucky.
Louisville collegiate school inspires academic excellence, extraordinary character and global citizenship.
Endeavor Louisville is leading the high-impact entrepreneurship movement in Kentucky, Indiana and Ohio, catalyzing long-term economic growth by selecting, mentoring, and supporting the best high-impact entrepreneurs in our region.…
Columbia college improves lives by providing quality education to both traditional and nontraditional students, helping them achieve their true potential.
Engage actively and continuously in medical research, education and training in the practice of medicine in conjunction with the department of family medicine of the indiana university school of medicine and indiana university…
The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.
Identify, mobilize, and fund programs to address louisville's greatest challenges regarding business growth and increased economic prosperity for all citizens in the greater louisville region.
Rooted in the liberal arts & sciences & lutheran expression of the christian faith, & is committed to offering a challenging education that develops qualities of mind, spirit, & body necessary for a rewarding life of leadership & service…
To support grassroots organizing, leadership development & public education around important public policy. ky coalition seeks to promote active citizen participation in the democratic process.
City year helps students and schools succeed, while preparing the next generation of civically engaged leaders who can work across lines of difference. partnering with teachers, teams of city year americorps members cultivate learning…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Cabbage Patch Settlement House Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Norton Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 33 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 36% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
114 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 114 of the 133 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds FULTUM FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds CRESCENT HILL FAMILY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds EVOLVE502 SCHOLARS FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF LOUISVILLE INC ↗
- Who funds EVOLVE502 INC ↗
- Who funds PRESIDENT AND TRUSTEES OF BATES COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds THE BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS INC ↗
- Who funds the Young Men's Christian Association of Greater Louisville Inc ↗
- Who funds NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICANA COMMUNITY CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds President and Fellows of Middlebury College ↗
- Who funds CABBAGE PATCH SETTLEMENT HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF KENTUCKIANA INC ↗
- Who funds PLAY COUSINS COLLECTIVE ↗
- Who funds KENTUCKY YOUTH ADVOCATES INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY COORDINATED CHILD CARE INC ↗
- Who funds LINCOLN FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds JEFFERSON COMMUNITY TECHNICAL COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds NEW DIRECTIONS HOUSING CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds METRO UNITED WAY INC ↗
- Who funds Sowing Seeds with Faith Inc ↗
- Who funds LOUISVILLE FREE PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATIO ↗
- Who funds THE CENTER FOR NONPROFIT EXCELLENCE ↗
- Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF LOUISVILLE INC ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MISSISSIPPI FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL CENTER FOR FAMILIES LEARNING INC ↗
- Who funds LOUISVILLE OLMSTED PARKS CONSERVANCY IN ↗
- Who funds THE LOUISVILLE URBAN LEAGUE INC ↗
- Who funds WESLEY HOUSE COMMUNITY SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds LIGHTHOUSE PROMISE INC ↗
- Who funds BELLARMINE UNIVERSITY INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF KENTUCKIANA INC ↗
- Who funds TEACH KENTUCKY INC ↗
- Who funds NAVY-MARINE CORPS RELIEF SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds RITA JUNE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds GLOBAL GAME CHANGERS CHILDREN'S EDUCATION INITIATIVE INC ↗
- Who funds KENTUCKY REFUGEE MINISTRIES INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Gheens Foundation Inc · The Community Foundation of Louisville Inc · James Graham Brown Foundation Inc · The Community Foundation of Louisville Corporate Depository Inc · The Community Foundation of Louisville Depository Inc · LG&E and Ku Foundation Inc · Republic Bank Foundation Inc · Honorable Order of Kentucky Colonels Inc · Metro United Way Inc · Kosair Charities Committee Inc · Cralle Foundation Inc · Brown-Forman Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization C E and S Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Save the Children Federation Inc — 30% of income from government
- President and Fellows of Middlebury College — 1% of income from government
- Yellow Ribbon Fund Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to C E and S Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to C E and S Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.