How much did LATINO ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION grant in FY2023?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 82% of LATINO ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2020

dds pllcmallhealthylawllpenergygroup

2021

theaterdanceheightsdiverseaudiencescleanersgroup

2022

covid reliefreducing foodfood wastedisbursement partner

2023

reducing hardshiphardship businessbusiness ownersretain growgrow smallsmall businessesreducing food

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2023 · 265 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2023

Under $10k74 grants · $569k
$10k–50k145 grants · $2.0M
$50k–250k42 grants · $4.1M
$250k+4 grants · $1.3M

$10,000

Median grant

States reached

$25M

Total assets

Largest grants

V-TECH SOLUTIONS INC$330,736
MOVEIUS CONTEMPORARY BALLET INC$318,616
JESSICA STUART MEDIA INC DBA LONG STORY SHORT MEDIA INC$305,013
FESTIVAL CENTER INC$300,000
BLACK WOMEN BUILD - BALTIMORE INC$200,000
WORKCHEW INC$200,000
MTB ENTERPRISES$200,000
PARITY BALTIMORE INCORPORATED$200,000
PROCURATED INC$192,400
BALTIMORE COMMUNITY LENDING INC$189,999
NJ3Q TECHNOLOGY LLC$180,800
TSUNAMI HAIR STUDIO LLC$175,000
RHEA SPACE ACTIVITY INC$167,459
UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE$166,667
MICHELLE STUBBS$155,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY22–23, $459k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12% — the area typically sits at 9%. 71% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

34%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$28M · 184 repeat orgs$54M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +33% since the first grant, against +18% for the ones you funded once.

184 repeat relationships — 40 still active in FY2023, 144 since wound down; 115 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

184

1701

Total granted

$28M

$49M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+33%

+18%

Still filing today

19%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 34% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4.7M went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Arts & CultureEducationHuman ServicesRecreation & SportsYouth DevelopmentHealthOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

BC
BALTIMORE COMMUNITY LENDING INC
2× · 2022–2023 · $880k · revenue +535%
FT
FORD'S THEATRE SOCIETY
2× · 2021–2022 · $748k · revenue +110%
WD
WASHINGTON DRAMA SOCIETY INC
2× · 2021–2022 · $748k · revenue +14%

Funded once

IS
INTERNATIONAL SPY MUSEUM
one grant, 2021 · $605k · revenue -48%
AE
AMC ENTERTAINMENT HOLDING INC
one grant, 2021 · $605k
WC
WHARF COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION
one grant, 2021 · $446k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

District of Columbia Arts Center

The District of Columbia Arts Center serves the Washington DC area by presenting high caliber and challenging works. It encourages professionalism among artists by providing a forum for educational and cultural exchange. DCAC was founded…

Arts & Culture

Capital Stage Company

Advancement of performing arts through live performance.

Arts & Culture

Washington Conservatory of Music

The Washington Conservatory of Music (the "Conservatory") is a District of Columbia not-for-profit corporation that is an independent nationally-accredited community music school offering lessons, classes and special events for children…

Arts & Culture

The Washington Center for the

To inspire audiences and artists of all ages through live performances, enriching the vibrancy of our community. It was created from a belief that a regional performing arts center was fundamental to the cultural pursuits of our community…

Arts & Culture

Dc Theater Arts Collaborative

The DC Theater Arts Collaborative provides financial and other assistance to small and emerging nonprofit theater companies in the Washington DC metropolitan area and elsewhere. Its goal is to provide a home for the arts in Washington DC…

—

National Philharmonic Orchestra and

The National Philharmonic engages, inspires, and unites diverse communities across the Washington, DC area through outstanding music performances and innovative education programs.

Arts & Culture

Center Stage Associates Inc

Inspired by our home city, baltimore center stage acts as a cultural catalyst for all communities to access theater in every form and engage in compelling conversations. programming: capture the collective imagination and build community…

Arts & Culture

Synetic Theater Inc

Washington DCs premier contemporary physical theater seeks to redefine theatre by devising a unique and innoivative blend of stage movement, dance, text, and music while investing in artists growth, and creating unforgettable visceral…

Arts & Culture

Classic Theatre of Maryland Inc

Classic Theatre of Marylands mission is to produce bold re-imagined entertaining and accessible interpretations of classical works contemporary plays and musicals with a core commitment to the works of Shakespeare and other major…

Arts & Culture

Dc Policy Center

The d.c. policy center is a non-partisan, independent think tank focused on advancing policies for a vibrant and growing economy in the district of columbia. the d.c. policy center provides objective, targeted, and high-quality data…

Public Benefit

Capital Fringe Inc

Capital Fringe was founded in 2005 with a mission to celebrate cultural democracy and access to art and artistic expression for all. By embracing diversity and a spirit of independence, we create earning opportunities for individual…

Arts & Culture

D C Arts and Humanities Education Collaborative Inc

DC Collaborative is a service organization for arts and humanities supporters who are committed to advancing equitable access for DC public school students.

Arts & Culture

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mosaic Theater Company of Dc and the most unlike its peers is International Spy Museum. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 31 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 21% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.2% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

0.2%5/2,732

the rest of the field

12%

2,187/18,345

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

153 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

145/153

Grantees still filing

107/153

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$67,610,154Arts & Culture$11,079,101Community Improvement$1,231,891Housing & Shelter$628,000Human Services$488,664Education$482,141Recreation & Sports$274,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

City First Enterprises IncDC106.8× affinity413 shared granteesties to 1 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: City First Enterprises Inc · Downtown Business Improvement District · Dallas Morse Coors Foundation for the · Dimick Foundation · Arts Council of Fairfax County Inc · Humanities Council of Washington DC · The Morris and Gwendolyn Cafritz · Mars Hq Regional Foundation · The Robert P and Arlene R Kogod Family · The Closet of the Greater Herndon Area Inc · Revada Foundation · Harold Rubenstein Family Charitable

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation LATINO ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

1get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: TANGO MERCURIO.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

insufficient risk

Limited financial data in public filings.

Track record & reputation

medium risk

4 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up 2.5× since.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 263451659 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on TANGO MERCURIO, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

Awaiting reportFinancial stability— Runway not derivable from filings.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 37% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Latino Economic Development Corporation?

Find your warmest path to Latino Economic Development Corporation through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

LATINO ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

153 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Latino Economic Development Corporation?

More from the funding graph

LATINO ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

153 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Latino Economic Development Corporation?

More from the funding graph