· Private foundation
The Greene-Milstein Family Foundation Co Monica Touesnard
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2020–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k103 grants · $205k
- $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| APPLESEED FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| SIMMONS UNIVERSITY | $6,000 |
| ROUND HOUSE THEATRE | $5,000 |
| ITHACA PUBLIC EDUCATION INITIATIVE | $5,000 |
| ITHACA REFORM TEMPLE-CONGREGATION TIKKUN | $5,000 |
| THE STUDIO THEATER | $5,000 |
| J STREET EDUCATION FUND | $5,000 |
| JOWONIO SCHOOL | $5,000 |
| PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA | $5,000 |
| WASHINGTON PERFORMING ARTS | $5,000 |
| SEEDS OF PEACE | $5,000 |
| CAPITAL AREA FOOD BANK | $4,000 |
| CURE ALZHEIMERS FUND | $4,000 |
| SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER | $4,000 |
| FOOD BANK OF CENTRAL NEW YORK | $4,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $56k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 87% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
109 repeat relationships — 92 still active in FY2024, 17 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- AFAPPLESEED FOUNDATION INC5× · 2020–2024 · $50k · revenue +172%
- JSJ STREET EDUCATION FUND INC5× · 2020–2024 · $29k · revenue +61%
- RHROUND HOUSE THEATRE INC5× · 2020–2024 · $25k · revenue +91%
Funded once
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2020 · $5k
- IRITHACA REFORM TEMPLEone grant, 2020 · $4k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…
The open markets institute works to help people relearn how to use competition policy to build stronger democracies, more just and equitable societies, more innovative and sustainable economies, and a more secure and peaceful world.
The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.
Advance science, engineering, and innovation throughout the world for the benefit of all. the world's largest multidisciplinary scientific society and a leading publisher of cutting-edge research through its science family of journals,…
The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.
Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.
The mission of the george washington university (gw) is to educate individuals in liberal arts, languages, sciences, learned professions, and other courses and subjects of study, and to conduct scholarly research and publish the findings…
To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.
The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…
Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…
Undergraduate, graduate, and professional education and research across a broad array of academic domains.
The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Children's Defense Fund and the most unlike its peers is Running Start. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 41 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
91 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 91 of the 124 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds The Studio Theatre Inc ↗
- Who funds APPLESEED FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds SIMMONS UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds J STREET EDUCATION FUND INC ↗
- Who funds SEEDS OF PEACE INC ↗
- Who funds ROUND HOUSE THEATRE INC ↗
- Who funds JOWONIO SCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds THE JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER WASHINGTON INC ↗
- Who funds Ithaca Public Education Initiative Inc ↗
- Who funds CAPITAL AREA FOOD BANK INC ↗
- Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE RESEARCH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CAMP CAPELLA INC ↗
- Who funds CHEYENNE RIVER YOUTH PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF STEWART PARK INC ↗
- Who funds The President and Trustees of Colby College ↗
- Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC ↗
- Who funds THE RESCUE MISSION ALLIANCE OF SYRACUSE ↗
- Who funds BREAD FOR THE CITY INC ↗
- Who funds FOOD BANK OF CENTRAL NEW YORK ↗
- Who funds A WIDER CIRCLE INC ↗
- Who funds Feeding America ↗
- Who funds RE-MEMBER ↗
- Who funds Cornell University ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S DEFENSE FUND ↗
- Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
- Who funds MARTHA'S TABLE INC ↗
- Who funds THE STRATHMORE HALL FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds JEWISH SOCIAL SERVICE AGENCY ↗
- Who funds CENTRAL MAINE HEALTHCARE CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds SMILE TRAIN INC ↗
- Who funds GREEN AMERICA ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Morris and Gwendolyn Cafritz Foundation · Greater Washington Community Foundation · Clark-Winchcole Foundation · Nora Roberts Foundation · Dimick Foundation John M Lynham Jr Trustee · Posner-Wallace Foundation · The Bakermerine Family Foundation Inc · Dallas Morse Coors Foundation for the Performing Arts · Legacy Foundation of Tompkins County · JM McDonald Foundation Inc · Central New York Community Foundation Inc · The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Greene-Milstein Family Foundation Co Monica Touesnard funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- The Strathmore Hall Foundation Inc — 7% of income from government
- A Wider Circle Inc — 6% of income from government
- Round House Theatre Inc — 5% of income from government
- Jewish Social Service Agency — 1% of income from government
- Simmons University — 1% of income from government
- Hebrew Home of Greater Washington Inc — 0% of income from government
- Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Greene-Milstein Family Foundation Co Monica Touesnard?
Find your warmest path to The Greene-Milstein Family Foundation Co Monica Touesnard through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.