Skip to content

Texas · Private foundation

Jasper Ridge Charitable Fund

Expanding philanthropic impact of donors by supporting and simplifying charitable giving and by promoting awareness of opportunities to improve social welfare through charitable grants and impact investments.

$26M
Granted FY2019
10
Itemized grants FY2019
9
Organizations funded FY2019
56%
First-time grantees FY2019
Read the full brief

Read this first · the figures below need context

100% of Jasper Ridge Charitable Fund’s FY2023 grant dollars went to Schwab Charitable Fund, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2023 names 0 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2019, the last year Jasper Ridge Charitable Fund named its own grantees at scale: 9 organizations, $25M. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

10
’17
10
’18
9
’19
17
’20
7
’21
9
’22
0
’23

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

Itemized, FY2019
$25M
The rest is grants the schedule does not break out
Median grant, FY2019
$50,000
Largest grant, FY2019
$25,000,000
Organizations funded a year
9 to 10
FY2017 to FY2019
States reached, FY2019
6

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2019, 56% of the organizations Jasper Ridge Charitable Fund funded were first-time grantees, receiving 99% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2019, 1% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $25M went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19
HealthCrime & LegalEducationSocial ScienceOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY20199$25M56%
FY201810$136k40%
FY201710$3.7Mn/a
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2023.

Philanthropy$101MEducation$46MHealth$7.2MCrime & Legal$3.6MPublic Safety & Disaster$1.0MHuman Services$758kInternational$500kYouth Development$95kOther$0

Where its grants go

Grant dollars by states, across the years we hold.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
MA
OR
PA
CA
NC
DC
AL
FL

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2022, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

Show all 26 grantees

Where it is load-bearing

Jasper Ridge Charitable Fund supplied at least a quarter of the budget for 1 of its grantees at some point. The chart plots its 25 largest grantees; load-bearing ones sit top left.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUniversity of Oregon Foundation: $25,000,000 over 2y, 8.5% of budgetOregon Health & Science University Foundation: $7,000,000 over 1y, 6.5% of budgetImpact Justice: $3,500,000 over 1y, 34% of budgetBlue Meridian Partners Inc: $738,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetVillage Enterprise Fund: $300,000 over 6y, 1.4% of budgetThe Bridgespan Group Inc: $250,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetNew Schools Fund: $250,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetWomen for Women International: $200,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetLucile Packard Foundation for Children's Health: $104,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSparkyouth NYC Inc: $95,000 over 3y, 3.3% of budgetCreative Commons Corporation: $65,000 over 4y, 2.5% of budgetGuardian Group: $57,000 over 6y, 2.1% of budgetMiraclefeet: $38,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetNAACP Legal Defense & Educ Fund Inc: $37,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSponsors for Educational Opportunity Inc: $30,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetImpactMatters Inc: $26,000 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetThe Urban Alliance Foundation Inc: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPlanned Parenthood Federation of America Inc: $21,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetEqualize Health Formerly D-Rev: $20,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetWarfighter Outfitters: $20,000 over 2y, 5.8% of budgetBehavioral Ideas Lab Inc: $17,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSouthern Poverty Law Center Inc: $16,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHigher Achievement Program Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNoora Health: $7,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetWounded Warrior Outdoors Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 25.

Nonprofits that may fit its grantmaking

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Gates FoundationWA20.8× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Gates Foundation · The William & Flora Hewlett Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Mulago Foundation · Skoll Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · Impactassetsinc · The David and Lucile Packard Foundation · The Ford Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Jasper Ridge Charitable Fund with peer funders

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Jasper Ridge Charitable Fund?

Find your warmest path to Jasper Ridge Charitable Fund through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

About Jasper Ridge Charitable Fund

How much does Jasper Ridge Charitable Fund give?
Jasper Ridge Charitable Fund reported 10 itemized grants totaling $25,380,000, out of $26,273,863 in total grant expense reported on the return in its FY2019 IRS filing. It funded between 9 and 10 organizations a year over FY2017 to FY2019.
What does Jasper Ridge Charitable Fund fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2022, its largest causes are Philanthropy (63%), Education (28%), Health (4%).
Who are Jasper Ridge Charitable Fund's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2022: University of Oregon Foundation ($25M), Oregon Health & Science University Foundation ($7.0M), Impact Justice ($3.5M).
Does Jasper Ridge Charitable Fund fund new organizations?
In FY2019, 56% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Which funders back the same organizations as Jasper Ridge Charitable Fund?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Gates Foundation, The William & Flora Hewlett Foundation, Silicon Valley Community Foundation.
Where is Jasper Ridge Charitable Fund based?
Jasper Ridge Charitable Fund is based in TX.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 32 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2019, released 2019. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Jasper Ridge’s filings →

More from the funding graph