Skip to content

California · Nonprofit

BECAUSE OF HOPE

BECAUSE OF HOPE (California) receives grants from 8 organizations whose IRS filings report $206,349 to it, the largest being JEWISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF SAN DIEGO ($151,000). 6 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 92% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.

Revenue FY2025
$180k
Funders on record
8
Grants received
$206k
Net assets
$100k
6/8 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 34%
01What it does

What Because of Hope does

Mission

To substainably empower widows and orphans in uganda.

As stated on its FY2025 Form 990.

Programs

  1. Boh student scholarship program: (bssp) provides scholarships for children in uganda to go to school. There were 24 students in this program in 2025.

    $65,377 spentof which $56,098 as grants
    52% of program spending
  2. The beads project program: in 2025, approximately 41 women in uganda were involved in this jewelry & craft making program which provides them with a source of income to support their families. The organization uses the net income for the beads project expenses and other programs in uganda.

    $36,101 spentof which $5,137 as grants
    29% of program spending
  3. Agriculture program: provides women in uganda with training and mentorship to learn improved farming methods. The women also learn how to raise farm animals. There were approximately 47 women who actively participated in 2025.

    $11,117 spentof which $4,031 as grants
    9% of program spending
  4. Group development loans: the organization works with women from three villages in uganda. Over the course of the last few years, the organization has given each village group an interest-free loan to do a group project. The loans have ranged from 250-450. This funding has flowed through wocap, the ugandan organization Because of Hope works with. Emergency funds: emergency support in the aftermath of the covid-19 pandemic. These funds have also been used to provide food and other support during urgent times and emergencies. There were no expenses for the emergency fund in 2025. Medical loans: the organization provided several interest free medical loans to staff members in uganda or women the organization works with. This has all flowed through wocap and each loan was less than 150. Staff savings program: in 2024, the organization started a staff savings program for the uganda staff team to encourage savings with the incentive the organization will match contributions up to 700. Miscellaneous grants: to operate the various programming in uganda.

    $12,256 spentof which $12,256 as grants
    10% of program spending

The 4 programs described on its FY2025 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $124,851.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($139k) Expenses 100 ($145k) Net assets 100 ($43k)2018 Revenue 78 ($109k) Expenses 74 ($108k) Net assets 103 ($44k)2019 Revenue 85 ($118k) Expenses 79 ($114k) Net assets 111 ($47k)2020 Revenue 143 ($198k) Expenses 121 ($176k) Net assets 155 ($67k)2021 Revenue 151 ($211k) Expenses 134 ($195k) Net assets 192 ($82k)2022 Revenue 149 ($208k) Expenses 137 ($200k) Net assets 211 ($90k)2023 Revenue 138 ($192k) Expenses 122 ($177k) Net assets 246 ($105k)2024 Revenue 153 ($213k) Expenses 135 ($196k) Net assets 285 ($122k)2025 Revenue 130 ($180k) Expenses 139 ($202k) Net assets 234 ($100k)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Revenue (130)Expenses (139)Net assets (234)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2024 to 2025, from $123k to $101k (−18%).

$44k
$45k
$48k
$67k
$83k
$91k
$106k
$123k
$101k
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

95% of BECAUSE OF HOPE’s revenue is contributions — about as donation-reliant as the typical peer (100% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 4,945 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 2 of the last 9 reported years ran a deficit.

−$6k
’17
$1k
’18
$4k
’19
$22k
’20
$16k
’21
$8k
’22
$15k
’23
$17k
’24
−$21k
’25
5.5
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

202020212022202320242025
Listed444333
Joined·+0+0+0+0+0
No longer listed·00100
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base held at 4 funders, grant income fell $46k → $24k.

4 of 8 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 92% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of BECAUSE OF HOPE’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

BECAUSE OF HOPE leans on a few funders — its largest provides 73% of grant income and the top three 91%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

92% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund BECAUSE OF HOPE.

73%
largest funder
91%
top three
~2
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 88% · 2018 75% · 2019 100% · 2020 79% · 2021 59% · 2022 98% · 2023 85% — diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

80% of BECAUSE OF HOPE's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 75% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y+3y+4y+5y+6y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

92% of BECAUSE OF HOPE's grant income arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors, whose addresses record where the money is held rather than where the donor is. Of the $17k that is directly attributable, 67% of it comes from California funders.

CA
CO

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’17
’18
’20
’21
’22
’23
California out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $189k arriving through sponsors registered in 4 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

BECAUSE OF HOPE is better cushioned than half of the 2,468 international nonprofits its size.

Operating margin−12% · bottom quartile
Months of reserve5.5mo · above the median
Revenue growth (annualized)3% · below the median

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 2,468 international nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2025

Organizations like BECAUSE OF HOPE

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In California

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

62% of spending goes to programs.

Program 62%Management 38%Fundraising 0%

Governance

3
board members
67%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy✓Whistleblower policy✓Document retention–Board reviewed the 990–Audited financials

Public support

96%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

CA

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for BECAUSE OF HOPE: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds BECAUSE OF HOPE?
BECAUSE OF HOPE (California) receives grants from 8 organizations whose IRS filings report $206,349 to it, the largest being JEWISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF SAN DIEGO ($151,000). 6 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 92% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.
How many funders does BECAUSE OF HOPE have?
IRS filings report 8 organizations giving $206,349 in grants to BECAUSE OF HOPE, 6 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of BECAUSE OF HOPE?
JEWISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF SAN DIEGO is the largest funder on record, with $151,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like BECAUSE OF HOPE find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in California. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds Because of Hope →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 8 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing