· Private foundation
The Earl and Bettie Fields Automotive Group Foundation Inc
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 44% of The Earl and Bettie Fields Automotive Group Foundation Inc’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k42 grants · $143k
- $10k–50k23 grants · $467k
- $50k–250k6 grants · $509k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| VILLAGE ENTERPRISE | $130,000 |
| MARCH OF DIMES | $107,680 |
| ACTION AGAINST HUNGER | $100,000 |
| MAKE-A-WISH WISHMAKERS BALL ORLANDO | $70,950 |
| ST MICHAELS SOLDIERS | $50,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $50,000 |
| MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION | $44,350 |
| SAFE SPACE FOR WOMEN AND GIRLS | $40,000 |
| RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE JACKSONVILLE | $32,400 |
| Individual grant recipient | $30,200 |
| JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF CHICAGO | $30,000 |
| AMERICAN RED CROSS | $30,000 |
| ILLINOIS HOLOCAUST MUSEUM | $25,000 |
| ABCD | $25,000 |
| WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN | $20,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–25, $331k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 79% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +27% since the first grant, against +17% for the ones you funded once.
125 repeat relationships — 47 still active in FY2025, 78 since wound down; 22 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 82% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $205k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- VEVILLAGE ENTERPRISE FUND5× · 2018–2025 · $714k · revenue +386%
- AAACTION AGAINST HUNGER - USA6× · 2020–2025 · $604k · revenue +105%
- SMST MICHAELS SOLDIERS INC8× · 2018–2025 · $310k · revenue +78% · 33% of their budget
Funded once
- TLTHE LEBRON JAMES FAMILY FOUNDATIONone grant, 2018 · $100k · revenue +7%
- CHCHRISTIAN HEALTH SERVICESone grant, 2019 · $72k
- CBCOMMUNITY BEREAVEMENT FOUNDATIONone grant, 2024 · $50k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
We champion the health needs of children and families. we are committed to improving children's health by providing the highest-quality, family centered care, advanced through research and education.
To cure cf and provide all people with cf the opportunity to lead long, fulfilling lives by funding research and drug development, partnering with the cf community, and advancing high-quality, specialized care.
Orlando health is a trusted leader inspiring hope through the advancement of health. our mission as a community-owned organization is to improve the health and quality of life of the individuals and communities we serve.
Susan g. komen has an unmatched, comprehensive 360-degree approach to fighting breast cancer across all fronts and supporting millions of people in the u.s. and in countries worldwide. we advocate for policies to protect patients, drive…
To inspire hope and promote lifelong health by providing the best care to every child.
Susan g. komen 's mission is to save lives by meeting the most critical needs in our communities & investing in breakthrough research to prevent & cure breast cancer.
Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.
The mission of children's cancer cause is to champion policies and programs that improve the lives of children with cancer and survivors.
Better together helps at-risk families by empowering parents and surrounding them with community, meaningful work opportunities, and practical support. our volunteer-driven, professionally supported model provides direct services so that…
Nicklaus Children's Health System is the region's only healthcare system exclusively for children. Our mission is to inspire hope and promote lifelong health by providing the best care to every child. TO PERFORM THE FUNCTIONS OF, OR TO…
The mission of dfci is to provide expert, compassionate, and equitable care to children, adults, and their families, while advancing the understanding, diagnosis, treatment, cure, and prevention of cancer and related diseases. we train new…
The multiple myeloma research foundation (mmrf) is the largest nonprofit in the world solely focused on accelerating acurefor multiple myeloma patient. we drive the development and delivery of next-generation therapies, leverage data to…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Easter Seals Florida Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Roberti Community House. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 31 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
185 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 185 of the 336 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds VILLAGE ENTERPRISE FUND ↗
- Who funds ACTION AGAINST HUNGER - USA ↗
- Who funds MARCH OF DIMES INC ↗
- Who funds ST MICHAELS SOLDIERS INC ↗
- Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
- Who funds Orlando Health Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds PINK RIBBON JAX INC ↗
- Who funds ONEPULSE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE LEBRON JAMES FAMILY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CLEAN LAKES ALLIANCE INC ↗
- Who funds JACKSONVILLE ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds Ronald McDonald House Global ↗
- Who funds BEACHES HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC ↗
- Who funds ELEVATE MKE INC ↗
- Who funds MARCUS CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS INC ↗
- Who funds Runway to Hope Inc ↗
- Who funds Mothers Trust Foundation ↗
- Who funds Jewish Community Centers of Chicago ↗
- Who funds FOUNDATION FOR FOSTER CHILDREN INC ↗
- Who funds Brother Wolf Animal Rescue Inc ↗
- Who funds FOUNDATION FOR EDMONDS SCHOOL DISTRICT ↗
- Who funds HOMEWARD BOUND INC ↗
- Who funds MANNA FOOD BANK INC ↗
- Who funds SHARON LYNNE WILSON CENTER FOR THE ARTS INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Community Foundation for Northeast Florida Inc · Baxter International Foundation · Csx Foundation Inc · Publix Super Markets Charities Inc · Pga Tour Inc · Jacksonville Jaguars Foundation Inc · Central Florida Foundation · The Gate Foundation Inc · Blue Cross Blue Shield of Florida Foundation · Adventist Health SystemSunbelt Inc · Armin and Esther Hirsch Foundation · The Dr P Phillips Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Earl and Bettie Fields Automotive Group Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Operation New Uniform Inc — 100% of income from government
- Volusia Recovery Alliance Inc — 28% of income from government
- Halifax Urban Ministries Inc — 18% of income from government
- Best Buddies International Inc — 4% of income from government
- Westjax Outreach Inc Community Health Outreach — 2% of income from government
- Cathedral Arts Project Inc — 1% of income from government
- United Arts of Central Florida Inc — 1% of income from government
- Spca Inc — 0% of income from government
- Jacksonville Zoological Society Inc — 0% of income from government
- Second Harvest Food Bank of Central Florida Inc — 0% of income from government
- Metropolitan Ministries Inc — 0% of income from government
- The Faine House Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.