· Public charity
Stand Together Foundation
Our mission is to build strong and safe communities in America by enabling people to learn, contribute, and realize their full potential.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 53 grants below total $66,007,892 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $93,366,889 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $27,358,997 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k1 grant · $8k
- $10k–50k17 grants · $372k
- $50k–250k24 grants · $2.6M
- $250k+11 grants · $63M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Stand Together Trust - TSNT | $50,000,000 |
| Global Orphan Project | $4,614,271 |
| Urban Specialists Inc | $2,075,000 |
| Metroplex Economic Development Corporation | $2,000,000 |
| Love Has No Limits Inc | $1,035,000 |
| Legacy Plus Foundation | $1,000,000 |
| GOOD SOIL EDC, INC | $1,000,000 |
| America's Promise - The Alliance for Youth | $500,000 |
| Dfree Global Foundation Inc | $278,800 |
| HopeNet, Inc | $250,000 |
| Oak Rose Fund | $250,000 |
| Build and Rebuild Inc | $216,000 |
| Friends of the Children | $200,000 |
| United Way of the Plains | $199,000 |
| Hope 4 Da Hood Inc | $180,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–22, $35.4M) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 85% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +61% since the first grant, against +33% for the ones you funded once.
127 repeat relationships — 18 still active in FY2024, 109 since wound down; 35 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5.1M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- PMPHOENIX MULTISPORT INC4× · 2019–2022 · $35M · revenue +151% · 71% of their budget
FII - NATIONAL3× · 2019–2021 · $15M · revenue +68%- USUrban Specialists Enterprises Inc5× · 2019–2024 · $9.3M · revenue +38% · 97% of their budget
Funded once
- RIRESCUE INTERNATIONALone grant, 2022 · $2.0M · revenue +49%
- USUrban Specialists Incone grant, 2021 · $1.8M
- JPJEREMIAH PROGRAMgraduatedone grant, 2019 · $831k · revenue +118%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
We provide training, coaching, community supports and access to leading colorado employers enabling coloradans to acheive economic security, mobility and prosperity.
As an innovative social enterprise, The Stride Center's mission is to empower men and women facing barriers to employment to achieve economic self-sufficiency. We provide a comprehensive career development program that includes job skills…
With love and respect, we partner with opportunity youth to build the skillsets and mindsets that lead to lifelong learning, livelihood, and leadership. youthbuild strives to create a world where all young people are seen for their…
STRIVEs purpose is to ensure that everyone can achieve upward mobility and financial empowerment for themselves and their families. Its mission is to provide a pathway to life-changing careers and opportunities through comprehensive…
Alternatives, inc.'s mission is to facilitate personal development,strengthen family relationships and enhance the community's well being. serving over 3,000 youth and families annually, the organization offers a range of counseling and…
Pathways kitchen helps justice-impacted youth thrive over survive by providing training, work opportunities and individualized support to ensure they can chart their own path forward
Upwardly global removes employment barriers for immigrant, refugee, and asylee professionals while advancing the inclusion of their skills into the u.s. economy.
Building a movement of diverse, upwardly mobile college grads overcoming underemployment through digital skills and peer connections.
Our mission is to increase socioeconomic mobility by building pathways to thriving careers.
Path to jobs, inc. is a workforce development and job placement organization with a mission to provide personalized career-readiness skills training, coaching, case management, benefits counseling, support to enter/re-enter the workforce,…
We provide effective employment services to individuals recently released from incarceration.
The hope program empowers new yorkers to build sustainable futures through training, jobs and career advancement.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Restoreokc Inc and the most unlike its peers is Mansmann Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 14 years old; the field is 16. You back the younger end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 3% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
360 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 360 of the 396 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THE SEMINAR NETWORK INC ↗
- Who funds PHOENIX MULTISPORT INC ↗
- Who funds FII - NATIONAL ↗
- Who funds Urban Specialists Enterprises Inc ↗
- Who funds SAFE FAMILIES FOR CHILDREN ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds THE GLOBAL ORPHAN PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds LOVE HAS NO LIMITS INC ↗
- Who funds DFREE GLOBAL FOUNDATION INC SOARIES ↗
- Who funds METROPLEX ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORP ↗
- Who funds RISING TIDE CAPITAL INC AND SUBSIDIARIES ↗
- Who funds MOMENTUM ADVISORY COLLECTIVE ↗
- Who funds BACK ON MY FEET ↗
- Who funds ALLIANCE FOR CHOICE IN EDUCATION ↗
- Who funds TURN 2 U INC dba THE LAST MILE ↗
- Who funds The Cara Program ↗
- Who funds RESCUE INTERNATIONAL ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN ↗
- Who funds NARRATIVE 4 INC ↗
- Who funds CAFE MOMENTUM ↗
- Who funds ELEVATE USA ↗
- Who funds THREAD INC ↗
- Who funds The Other Side Academy ↗
- Who funds Youth Guidance ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN - PORTLAND FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds GOOD SOIL EDC INC ↗
- Who funds LEGACY PLUS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds PER SCHOLAS INC ↗
- Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES DIOCESE OF FORT WORTH ↗
- Who funds JEREMIAH PROGRAM ↗
- Who funds Unity Unlimited Inc ↗
- Who funds MOBILE LOAVES & FISHES INC ↗
- Who funds THE WORKFAITH CONNECTION ↗
- Who funds EDUCATION OPENS DOORS INC ↗
- Who funds FACE IT TOGETHER INC ↗
- Who funds PRISON FELLOWSHIP MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds NPOWER INC ↗
- Who funds ACTS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds NEW CITY KIDS INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: New Profit Inc · The Seminar Network Inc · Kansas Health Foundation · Redf · Truist Foundation Inc · The Fidelity Bank Foundation · United Way of the Plains Inc · United Way of Metropolitan Dallas Inc · National Basketball Association Foundation · Berry Foundation Inc · Charles Koch Foundation · Wichita Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Stand Together Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Roca Inc — 78% of income from government
- Fp YouthOutcry Foundation Inc Dba the Hubb Arts & Trauma Center — 29% of income from government
- Uncornered Inc — 24% of income from government
- Fathers Uplift Incorporated — 22% of income from government
- Vehicles for Change Inc — 16% of income from government
- Thread Inc — 12% of income from government
- Rising Tide Capital Inc and Subsidiaries — 2% of income from government
- Humanim Inc — 1% of income from government
- Guadalupe Center Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.