· Private foundation
Florence J Gillmor Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- $10k–50k9 grants · $185k
- $50k–250k21 grants · $2.0M
- $250k+2 grants · $2.5M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| WESTMINSTER | $2,200,000 |
| UTAH FOOD BANK | $300,000 |
| AND JUSTICE FOR ALL | $200,000 |
| THE ROAD HOME | $200,000 |
| FOURTH STREET CLINIC | $200,000 |
| THE NATIONAL AUDUBON SOCIETY | $100,000 |
| YWCA | $100,000 |
| THE NATURE CONSERVANCY | $100,000 |
| GUADELOUPE SCHOOL | $100,000 |
| BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF SLC | $100,000 |
| UTAH SYMPHONY & OPERA | $100,000 |
| THE CHILDREN'S CENTER | $100,000 |
| NATIONAL ABILITY CENTER | $100,000 |
| ROCKY MOUNTAIN INNOCENCE CENTER | $100,000 |
| UTAH CENTER FOR LEGAL INCLUSION | $75,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $2.0M) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Where the work is directed
The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.
About 100% of Florence J Gillmor Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 100% of the giving stays in UT; read by stated purpose it is 0% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +53% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.
29 repeat relationships — 25 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $250k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- AJAND JUSTICE FOR ALL6× · 2020–2025 · $2.5M · revenue +182% · 26% of their budget
- UFUTAH FOOD BANK6× · 2020–2025 · $1.3M · revenue +53%
- WHWasatch Homeless Health Care6× · 2020–2025 · $1.3M · revenue +85%
Funded once
- TNTHE NATIONAL AUDUBON SOCIETYone grant, 2025 · $100k
- UCUPLIFT COMMUNITY ALLIANCEone grant, 2025 · $50k · revenue 0%
- CSClean Slate Utahone grant, 2025 · $50k · revenue -25%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
We help families experiencing homelessness find lasting independence and security.
Utah Humanities collaborates with libraries, museums, historical societies, schools, colleges, and cultural and civic groups; provides capacity-building opportunities for volunteers and professionals in the cultural sector; presents…
To serve The People by honoring Native cultures, strengthening health and wellness programs, and cultivating community. We envision all Native peoples living balanced, prosperous, and healthy lives in diverse communities for Seven…
Democracy Means Equality, Freedom & Justice: It means having a representative government. UDC is here to transform Utah politics and ensure that every voice counts.
The promotion of low-income housing within the state of utah.
Stimulate local business establishment, growth, and development by facilitating business to business and business to community relationships throughout Utah County.
Our mission is to engage with communities and catalyze private, public, and philanthropic partnerships to remedy opportunity gaps in economic opportunity, education, health, and housing in Utah.
Utah Homicide Survivors provides holistic legal representation to families of homicide victims.
Our mission at uls is to provide high-quality civil legal aid without cost to people who are unable to afford legal representation or are facing disadvantages, ensuring meaningful access to justice, and promoting education, stability,…
Provide housing to low-income families in provo, utah.
Provides free legal representation for victims of crime including providing information, support, and advocacy for victims as they go through the criminal justice process.
The mission of the Utah Safety Council is to save lives by promoting safety and health through education, services, and products.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is And Justice for All and the most unlike its peers is The Nature Conservancy. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 51 years old; the field is 13. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 25% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 35 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds AND JUSTICE FOR ALL ↗
- Who funds UTAH FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds Wasatch Homeless Health Care ↗
- Who funds THE ROAD HOME ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL ABILITY CENTER ↗
- Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
- Who funds Rocky Mountain Innocence Center ↗
- Who funds UTAH SYMPHONY & OPERA ↗
- Who funds THE CHILDREN'S CENTER UTAH ↗
- Who funds BALLET WEST ↗
- Who funds UTAH CENTER FOR LEGAL INCLUSION ↗
- Who funds Neighborhood House Association ↗
- Who funds HUMANE SOCIETY OF UTAH ↗
- Who funds THE INN BETWEEN ↗
- Who funds Ronald McDonald House Charities of the Intermountain Area Inc ↗
- Who funds UTAH YOUTH VILLAGE ↗
- Who funds Peoples Legal Aid ↗
- Who funds American Indian Services ↗
- Who funds Maliheh Free Clinic ↗
- Who funds UPLIFT COMMUNITY ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds Clean Slate Utah ↗
- Who funds UTAH CLEAN ENERGY ALLIANCE INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: George S and Dolores Dore Eccles Foundation · Sorenson Legacy Foundation · The Community Foundation of Utah · Lawrence & Janet Dee Foundation · Larry H Miller and Gail Miller Family Foundation · Herbert I & Elsa B Michael Foundation US Bank National Association · Katherine W Dumke & Ezekiel R Dumke Jr Foundation · The Archer Family Charitable Corp · Marriner S Eccles Foundation · Intermountain Community Care Foundation Inc · David Kelby Johnson Memorial Foundation · Dominion Energy Charitable Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Florence J Gillmor Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Florence J Gillmor Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Florence J Gillmor Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.