Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →
Plinth

· Public charity

California Partnership to End Domestic Violence

The organization's mission is to promote the collective voice of a diverse coalition of organizations and individuals working to eliminate all forms of domestic violence.

$309k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$149k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
0163% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2022–2025.

Human Services$2.6MCrime & Legal$373kHousing & Shelter$260kHealth$134kPhilanthropy$100kCivil Rights$100kYouth Development$58kOther$2.1M
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k3 grants · $54k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $251k
$21,250
Median grant
3
States reached
$1.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ENFUSE ACTION COLLECTIVE$149,132
LUMINA ALLIANCE$101,952
HOUSING JUSTICE COLLECTIVE LLC$21,250
SHELTER PARTNERSHIP INC$18,438
PUBLIC HEALTH INSTITUTE$14,198
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY22–25, $2.4M) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 90% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%INTERFACE CHILDREN & FAMILY SERVICE: $77k → 10%HUMAN OPTIONS INC: $5k → 10%WOMEN'S RESOURCE CENTER INC: $60k → 11%SAFE FAMILY JUSTICE CENTERS: $59k → 11%LUMINA ALLIANCE: $234k → 12%WOMENS CENTER-YOUTH &: $73k → 12%MONARCH SERVICES: $38k → 13%DESERT SANCTUARY INC: $55k → 14%NEW STAR FAMILY CENTER: $27k → 14%EMPOWER YOLO INC: $70k → 16%HUMBOLDT DOMESTIC VIOLENCE SERVICES: $55k → 18%FAMILY SERVICES OF TULARE COUNTY: $43k → 18%MARJAREE MASON CENTER INC: $68k → 19%INTERFACE CHILDREN & FAMILY SERVICE: $24k → 10%LAURA'S HOUSE: $72k → 10%WOMEN'S RESOURCE CENTER INC: $30k → 11%SAFE FAMILY JUSTICE CENTERS: $41k → 11%LUMINA ALLIANCE: $185k → 12%WOMEN'S CENTER-YOUTH & FAMILY: $24k → 12%MONARCH SERVICES: $30k → 13%DESERT SANCTUARY INC: $42k → 14%NEW STAR FAMILY CENTER: $26k → 14%EMPOWER YOLO INC: $30k → 16%HUMBOLDT DOMESTIC VIOLENCE SERVICES: $29k → 18%FAMILY SERVICES OF TULARE COUNTY: $38k → 18%MARJAREE MASON CENTER INC: $23k → 19%DEAFHOPE: $46k → 9%COALITION FOR FAMILY HARMONY: $75k → 10%LAURA'S HOUSE: $21k → 10%LUMINA ALLIANCE: $138k → 12%BELOVED SURVIVORS: $32k → 19%COALITION FOR FAMILY HARMONY: $25k → 10%INTERVAL HOUSE: $46k → 10%LUMINA ALLIANCE: $102k → 12%DOVES OF BIG BEAR VALLEY INC: $77k → 14%BELOVED SURVIVORS: $11k → 19%INTERVAL HOUSE: $45k → 10%DOVES OF BIG BEAR VALLEY INC: $19k → 14%RAINBOW SERVICES: $50k → 14%SHEPHERD'S DOOR DOMESTIC VIOLENCE RESOURCE CENTER: $18k → 14%WOMEN'S TRANSITIONAL LIVING: $50k → 10%RAINBOW SERVICES: $50k → 14%WOMEN'S TRANSITIONAL LIVING CENTER: $20k → 10%HOUSE OF RUTH: $52k → 14%HOUSE OF RUTH: $30k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$5.2M · 43 repeat orgs$473k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +2% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.

43 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2025, 38 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

43
14

Total granted

$5.2M
$473k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+2%
0%

Still filing today

91%
79%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesCrime & LegalHousing & ShelterHealthYouth DevelopmentPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SP
    SHELTER PARTNERSHIP INC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $157k · revenue +1%
  • SC
    SAC Connect
    3× · 2022–2024 · $138k · revenue +86%
  • CONTRA COSTA FAMILY JUSTICE ALLIANCE
    2× · 2023–2024 · $132k · revenue +11%

Funded once

  • RO
    REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT IRVINE
    one grant, 2024 · $100k
  • AC
    Alameda County Board of Supervisors
    one grant, 2024 · $96k
  • TB
    The Black Neighborhood
    one grant, 2024 · $58k · revenue 0% · 42% of their budget

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Casa de Esperanza

Casa is a refuge, providing protection and education for people caught in the cylces of domestic violence, sexual assault and child assault. Casa is a healing community where women and children can receive the nurturing and support…

Human Services
2
Center for Community Solutions

The mission is to end relationship and sexual violence by being a catalyst for caring communities and social justice. the vision is for all people to live full, free, expressive, and empowered lives in a safe, healthy, vibrant, and…

Health
3
Safe Embrace

Safe Embrace is committed to ending the cycle of domestic and sexual violence with innovative prevention and intervention services. We help victims of domestic abuse, sexual assault, and human trafficking become survivors by providing…

Health
4
The Center for Violence-Free Relationships

The Center for Violence-Free Relationships is dedicated to building healthy relationships, families, and communities free from sexual assault and domestic violence through education, advocacy, and services in western El Dorado County.

—
5
Domestic Violence Safe Options Svcs

Aid victims of domestic violence/assualt

—
6
Domestic Violence Project

The mission of SafeHouse Center is to empower survivors of both sexual and intimate partner violence by providing advocacy, support, and promoting social change within our community.

Human Services
7
The San Francisco Particular Council of the Society of St Vincent De Paul

The mission of the st. vincent de paul society of san francisco (svdp-sf) is to offer hope and service on a direct person-to-person basis, working to break the cycles of homelessness and domestic violence.

Human Services
8
Safe of Columbia County

Domestic and sexual violence intervention, support, and education.

—
9
Safe Voices

The mission of Safe Voices is to provide person-to-person, individualized advocacy for all survivors of domestic abuse and violence, sex trafficking, and sexual exploitation in Androscoggin, Franklin, and Oxford Counties and engage our…

—
10
Domestic Violence & Sexual Assault Services of Whatcom County

The mission of domestic violence and sexual assault services is to support individuals affected by domestic violence, sexual assault, and sexual exploitation, and to lead the community toward ending these abuses of power.

Health
11
Safe Nesttemporary Assistance for

Safe nest's mission is to provide comprehensive, collaborative, and innovative services for everyone affected by domestic and sexual violence while passionatley working to end this shared epidemic.

Human Services
12
Dove House Advocacy Services

With wrap-around services, dove house seeks to address the needs of victimes of domestic violence, sexual assaultm and general crime in jefferson county as they navigate the many systems required to move from being victims to surviving and…

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ywca of Glendale and Pasadena and the most unlike its peers is Sac Connect. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 45 years old; the field is 13. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number25%0%<5yr15%11%5–10yr20%2%10–20yr17%21%20–35yr11%50%35–55yr12%16%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value25%0%<5yr15%11%5–10yr20%4%10–20yr17%20%20–35yr11%53%35–55yr12%12%55yr+

The field is 25% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
2%1/57
the rest of the field
15%
21,994/148,855

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

51 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 51 of the 57 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
50/51
Grantees still filing
28/51
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

LUMINA ALLIANCE — $657,927 · Human ServicesLUMINA ALLIANCEHuman Options Inc — $104,643 · Human ServicesInterface Children Family Services — $100,696 · Human ServicesEmpower Yolo Inc — $100,000 · Human ServicesSAFE FAMILY JUSTICE CENTERS — $100,000 · Human ServicesRAINBOW SERVICES — $100,000 · Human ServicesCOALITION FOR FAMILY HARMONY — $100,000 · Human ServicesKINGS COMMUNITY ACTION ORGANIZATION INC — $99,574 · Human ServicesPREVAIL CA — $97,001 · Human ServicesThe Desert Sanctuary Inc — $96,880 · Human ServicesDOVES OF BIG BEAR VALLEY INC — $95,960 · Human ServicesLAURA'S HOUSE — $92,879 · Human ServicesMARJAREE MASON CENTER INC — $91,275 · Human ServicesWOMENS RESOURCE CENTER — $90,844 · Human ServicesINTERVAL HOUSE — $90,744 · Human Services+9 more — $543,100 · Human Services+9 moreENFUSE ACTION COLLECTIVE — $697,375 · OtherENFUSE ACTION COLLECTIVESAC Connect — $137,672 · OtherSAC ConnectHOUSING JUSTICE COLLECTIVE LLC — $134,000 · OtherHOUSING JUSTICE COLLECTIVE LLCSafeQuest Solano Inc — $105,259 · OtherWEAVE INC — $101,447 · OtherA SAFE PLACE — $100,000 · OtherCORA Community Overcoming Relationship Abuse — $100,000 · OtherCommunity Beyond Violence — $100,000 · OtherREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT IRVINE — $99,694 · OtherAlameda County Board of Supervisors — $96,250 · OtherPEACE OVER VIOLENCE — $96,227 · OtherTOLOWA DEE-NI' NATION — $86,080 · OtherOPTION HOUSE — $82,726 · OtherLAO FAMILY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT INC — $73,721 · Other+5 more — $98,046 · OtherCONTRA COSTA FAMILY JUSTICE ALLIANCE — $132,236 · Crime & LegalPOSITIVE RESULTS CENTER — $100,000 · Crime & LegalFamily Violence Law Center — $90,196 · Crime & LegalWAYMAKERS — $26,035 · Crime & LegalRiverside County Coalition for Alternatives to Domestic Violence — $16,359 · Crime & Legal+1 more — $7,689 · Crime & LegalSHELTER PARTNERSHIP INC — $157,376 · Housing & ShelterRUBY'S PLACE INC — $95,051 · Housing & Shelter+1 more — $7,088 · Housing & ShelterAlliance for Community Transformations — $100,000 · HealthPublic Health Institute — $34,198 · HealthCORONA NORCO UNITED WAY — $100,000 · PhilanthropyGLOBAL TRANSGENDER SAFETY TASK FORCE USA INC — $99,985 · Civil RightsThe Black Neighborhood — $57,922 · Youth Development
Human Services$2,561,523Other$2,108,497Crime & Legal$372,515Housing & Shelter$259,515Health$134,198Philanthropy$100,000Civil Rights$99,985Youth Development$57,922

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetLUMINA ALLIANCE — $657,927 over 4y, 3.8% of budgetSHELTER PARTNERSHIP INC — $157,376 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetSAC Connect — $137,672 over 3y, 13% of budgetCONTRA COSTA FAMILY JUSTICE ALLIANCE — $132,236 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetSafeQuest Solano Inc — $105,259 over 2y, 3.7% of budgetHuman Options Inc — $104,643 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetWEAVE INC — $101,447 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetInterface Children Family Services — $100,696 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetEmpower Yolo Inc — $100,000 over 2y, 2.0% of budgetSAFE FAMILY JUSTICE CENTERS — $100,000 over 2y, 2.9% of budgetPOSITIVE RESULTS CENTER — $100,000 over 2y, 8.0% of budgetA SAFE PLACE — $100,000 over 2y, 7.7% of budgetRAINBOW SERVICES — $100,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetCORONA NORCO UNITED WAY — $100,000 over 2y, 15% of budgetCORA Community Overcoming Relationship Abuse — $100,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetCOALITION FOR FAMILY HARMONY — $100,000 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetCommunity Beyond Violence — $100,000 over 2y, 3.6% of budgetAlliance for Community Transformations — $100,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetKINGS COMMUNITY ACTION ORGANIZATION INC — $99,574 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPREVAIL CA — $97,001 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetThe Desert Sanctuary Inc — $96,880 over 2y, 3.2% of budgetPEACE OVER VIOLENCE — $96,227 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetDOVES OF BIG BEAR VALLEY INC — $95,960 over 2y, 4.0% of budgetRUBY'S PLACE INC — $95,051 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetLAURA'S HOUSE — $92,879 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetMARJAREE MASON CENTER INC — $91,275 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetWOMENS RESOURCE CENTER — $90,844 over 2y, 2.8% of budgetINTERVAL HOUSE — $90,744 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetFamily Violence Law Center — $90,196 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetHUMBOLDT DOMESTIC VIOLENCE SERVICES — $83,646 over 2y, 7.7% of budgetOPTION HOUSE — $82,726 over 2y, 3.9% of budgetHOUSE OF RUTH INC — $81,469 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetFAMILY SERVICES OF TULARE COUNTY INC — $80,931 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetLAO FAMILY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT INC — $73,721 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetWOMENS TRANSITIONAL LIVING CENTER INC RADIANT FUTURES — $69,897 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetMONARCH SERVICES-SERVICIOS MONARCA — $67,868 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetThe Black Neighborhood — $57,922 over 1y, 42% of budgetNEW STAR FAMILY CENTER — $53,156 over 2y, 4.3% of budgetDEAFHOPE — $46,000 over 1y, 13% of budgetNeighborhood Legal Services of Los Angeles County — $44,897 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetBeloved Survivors Trauma Recovery Center — $42,093 over 2y, 4.4% of budgetPublic Health Institute — $34,198 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWAYMAKERS — $26,035 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetYWCA OF GLENDALE AND PASADENA — $18,318 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetSHEPHERDS DOOR — $18,040 over 1y, 16% of budgetRiverside County Coalition for Alternatives to Domestic Violence — $16,359 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetEMPOWER TEHAMA — $7,689 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCENTER FOR THE PACIFIC-ASIAN FAMILY INC — $7,088 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Women's Foundation of…California Physicians…Kaiser Foundation Hos…ValorusWeingart FoundationIn-N-Out Burgers Foun…Sierra Health Foundat…Orange County Communi…East Bay Community Fo…California Community …California Foundation…The California Endowm…
Women's Foundation of CaliforniaCA75× affinity34 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Women's Foundation of California · California Physicians' Service Fdn Dba Blue Shield of California Fdn · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · Valorus · Weingart Foundation · In-N-Out Burgers Foundation · Sierra Health Foundation Center for Health Program Management · Orange County Community Foundation · East Bay Community Foundation · California Community Foundation · California Foundation for Stronger Communities · The California Endowment

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization California Partnership to End Domestic Violence funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%13%28%50%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    21report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 57 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home
    State money flows
    the interactive map of money crossing state lines