Skip to content
Plinth
Funding

Washington · Nonprofit

KITSAP CANCER SERVICES

KITSAP CANCER SERVICES (Washington) receives grants from 7 organizations whose IRS filings report $96,439 to it, the largest being East Bremerton Rotary Foundation ($41,564). 2 of them have funded it in more than one year.

$96k
Revenue FY2025
7
Funders on record
$96k
Grants received
$128k
Net assets
2/7 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 55%

Against its field

KITSAP CANCER SERVICES runs a healthier operating margin than half of the 5,769 health nonprofits its size.

Operating margin26% · above the median
Revenue growth (annualized)3% · above the median

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 5,769 health nonprofits under $100k, FY2025

Three funders worth looking at

Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.

See all 12 prospects and why each one surfaced →
01The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($75k) Expenses 100 ($83k) Net assets 100 ($45k)2018 Revenue 108 ($82k) Expenses 95 ($78k) Net assets 104 ($47k)2019 Revenue 128 ($97k) Expenses 94 ($78k) Net assets 148 ($67k)2020 Revenue 101 ($76k) Expenses 78 ($65k) Net assets 175 ($79k)2021 Revenue 108 ($81k) Expenses 106 ($88k) Net assets 161 ($73k)2022 Revenue 120 ($90k) Expenses 110 ($91k) Net assets 152 ($68k)2023 Revenue 194 ($147k) Expenses 122 ($101k) Net assets 253 ($114k)2024 Revenue 107 ($81k) Expenses 111 ($92k) Net assets 229 ($103k)2025 Revenue 128 ($96k) Expenses 86 ($71k) Net assets 284 ($128k)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Revenue (128)Expenses (86)Net assets (284)Peer revenue range

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

100% of KITSAP CANCER SERVICES’s revenue is contributions — more donation-reliant than the typical peer (100% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 12,162 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 4 of the last 9 reported years ran a deficit.

$7k
17
$3k
18
$19k
19
$12k
20
$6k
21
$1k
22
$45k
23
$11k
24
$25k
25
02Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2019 → 2023: the base broadened from 1 funder to 5 funders, grant income rose $1k → $35k.

3 of 7 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF)38% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of KITSAP CANCER SERVICES’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

KITSAP CANCER SERVICES leans on a few funders — its largest provides 43% of grant income and the top three 85%; half comes from just 2 funders.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 2 funders to its left

91% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund KITSAP CANCER SERVICES.

43%
largest funder
85%
top three
~3
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2019 100% · 2020 100% · 2021 100% · 2022 99% · 2023 34%diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

82% of KITSAP CANCER SERVICES's grant income comes from Washington funders.

WA
CA
FL

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

19
20
23
Washington out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $36k arriving through sponsors registered in 2 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

03Its place in the field

Funders to approach

Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first. Your 7 funders put you under-funded among the 319 organizations that share them.

From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.

Organizations like KITSAP CANCER SERVICES

Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Washington

Nationally

04Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Public support

100%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for KITSAP CANCER SERVICES: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds KITSAP CANCER SERVICES?
KITSAP CANCER SERVICES (Washington) receives grants from 7 organizations whose IRS filings report $96,439 to it, the largest being East Bremerton Rotary Foundation ($41,564). 2 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does KITSAP CANCER SERVICES have?
IRS filings report 7 organizations giving $96,439 in grants to KITSAP CANCER SERVICES, 2 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of KITSAP CANCER SERVICES?
East Bremerton Rotary Foundation is the largest funder on record, with $41,564 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like KITSAP CANCER SERVICES find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Washington. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 7funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported August 27, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing