· Private foundation
Names Family Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k71 grants · $184k
- $10k–50k83 grants · $1.3M
- $50k–250k16 grants · $1.3M
- $250k+7 grants · $4.2M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| MULTICARE HEALTH FOUNDATION | $1,489,010 |
| YMCA OF PIERCE AND KITSAP COUNTIES | $755,880 |
| BELLARMINE PREPARATORY SCHOOL | $500,000 |
| GREATER TACOMA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION | $456,786 |
| GAME TIME WAY | $450,000 |
| GREATER TACOMA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION | $300,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION | $268,000 |
| GIG HARBOR CANOE KAYAK RACING TEAM | $135,000 |
| GREATER METRO PARKS FOUNDATION DBA TACOMA PARKS FOUNDATION | $135,000 |
| RAINIER ADAPTIVE SPORTS | $125,000 |
| SEATTLE CHILDRENS HOSPITAL FOUNDATION | $120,000 |
| PARTNERS FOR PARKS | $100,000 |
| BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF SOUTH PUGET SOUND | $100,000 |
| GREATER TACOMA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION | $100,000 |
| SPECIAL OLYMPICS WASHINGTON | $80,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–24, $6.6M) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 13% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Where the work is directed
The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.
About 15% of Names Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 86% of the giving stays in WA; read by stated purpose it is 78% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +36% since the first grant, against +28% for the ones you funded once.
179 repeat relationships — 92 still active in FY2024, 87 since wound down; 41 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 81% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.2M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- YMYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF PIERCE AND KITSAP COUNTIES5× · 2019–2024 · $3.6M · revenue +28%
- MFMULTICARE FOUNDATIONS6× · 2019–2024 · $3.1M · revenue +163%
THE TRUST FOR PUBLIC LAND4× · 2019–2023 · $2.8M · revenue +112%
Funded once
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2021 · $1.0M
- SCSEATTLE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL AND RESEARCH FOUNDATIONone grant, 2019 · $202k
THE ASPEN INSTITUTE INCgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $185k · revenue +134%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To grow a lasting culture of generosity and well-being in the South Puget Sound through connection, leadership, and investment.
United way of snohomish county improves lives for families in snohomish county by bringing people, resources, and strategy together.
The Spokane Parks Foundation cultivates the health, growth, and continued enjoyment of our communities by inspiring giving and passion for our parks.
Washington Bikes works to ensure that all who ride a bicycle in Washington have safe comfortable and convenient places to ride. Organization advocates for bicyclists rights and shapes policies.
Preserve in perpetuity the natural habitats, rural landscapes, and open spaces of the great peninsula of washington's puget sound.
Restoring hope, building futures, and strengthening our communities through programs with youth, young adults and families. we support the behavioral health of at-risk and in-crisis youth across the greater south king county area. we take…
We provide hope, education and support to sarcoma patients and their families in the pacific northwest while investing in research to improve cure rates for sarcomas.
Pacific Northwest University of Health Sciences educates and trains health care professionals emphasizing service among rural and medically under-served communities throughout the Northwest.
The mission of the Foundation is to promote, accept, and maximize private support for programs, initiatives, and properties of Washington State University and its regional campuses. The Foundation also prudently manages, invests, and…
The Community Foundation of Snohomish County (the Foundation) is a nonprofit, tax-exempt organization incorporated under the laws of the State of Washington. The Foundation serves as a community foundation, supporting a broad spectrum of…
Economic and community development through sport tourism. bid to host and create major sporting events, and facility consultation and optimization.
Discover Your Northwest promotes the discovery of northwest public lands, enriches the experience of visitors and builds community stewardship of these special places today and for generations to come.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Make-a-Wish Foundation of Alaska & Washington and the most unlike its peers is Natalie Giorgi Sunshine Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 27 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 21% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.3% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
288 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 288 of the 391 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF PIERCE AND KITSAP COUNTIES ↗
- Who funds GREATER TACOMA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds MULTICARE FOUNDATIONS ↗
- Who funds THE TRUST FOR PUBLIC LAND ↗
- Who funds Greater Metro Parks Foundation dba Tacoma Parks Foundation ↗
- Who funds Children's Hospital Los Angeles ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF AMERICAN LAKE VETERANS GOLF COURSE ↗
- Who funds Seattle Children's Foundation ↗
- Who funds Seven Acres Foundation ↗
- Who funds Cascade Christian Schools ↗
- Who funds THE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH ↗
- Who funds THE GAME TIME WAY ↗
- Who funds GIG HARBOR CANOE KAYAK RACING TEAM ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds FIRST TEE OF SOUTH PUGET SOUND ↗
- Who funds GREENTRIKE ↗
- Who funds MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF SAN DIEGO ↗
- Who funds Amputee Blade Runners ↗
- Who funds MULTICULTURAL CHILD AND FAMILY HOPE CENTER ↗
- Who funds THE COFFEE OASIS ↗
- Who funds Outdoors for all Foundation ↗
- Who funds TAKING THE REINS ↗
- Who funds THE MULTIPLE MYELOMA RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds STEP BY STEP FAMILY SUPPORT CENTER ↗
- Who funds THE ASPEN INSTITUTE INC ↗
- Who funds THE RAPE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Rainier Adaptive Sports ↗
- Who funds TACOMA ATHLETIC COMMISSION ↗
- Who funds THE BAR X PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds LIGHTHOUSE CHRISTIAN SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds WENATCHEE VALLEY COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds CAMP KOREY ↗
- Who funds SOUTH SOUND CARE FOUNDATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Greater Tacoma Community Foundation · Korum for Kids Foundation · The Bamford Foundation · Fuchsg & M Fdn Tai · The Norcliffe Foundation · Gary E Milgard Family Foundation- Sunshine · Woodworth Family Foundation · Kilworth Florence Char Tr Fndn · Puget Sound Energy Foundation · Ben B Cheney Foundation Inc · Forest Foundation · The Dimmer Family Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Names Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- National Institute for Children's Health Quality Inc — 100% of income from government
- Oregon State University Foundation — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Names Family Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Names Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.