Skip to content

Alabama · Nonprofit

THE BIRMINGHAM BOTANICAL SOCIETY INC

THE BIRMINGHAM BOTANICAL SOCIETY INC (Alabama) receives grants from 45 organizations whose IRS filings report $4,943,449 to it, the largest being LUCILLE S BEESON CHAR TR BOND MGMT ($1,857,124). 34 of them have funded it in more than one year.

Revenue FY2025
$4.0M
Funders on record
45
Grants received
$4.9M
Net assets
$29M
34/45 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 35%
01What it does

What The Birmingham Botanical Society Inc does

Mission

The friends advance public knowledge and appreciation of plants, gardens, and the environment through education, volunteerism, and assistance to a public botanical garden.

As stated on its FY2025 Form 990.

Programs

  1. Gardensthe friends assist with operational needs of a public botanical garden through ongoing stewardship and enhancement of more than 67 acres of garden grounds, including over two dozen themed garden spaces. Routine projects includes providing plants, supplies, tools, equipment, and contracted services; non-routine projects include repair, renovation, and enhancement of gardens and garden features. Dedicated personnel includes 4 staff horticulturists and 2 seasonal interns, and the friends coordinate thousands of volunteer hours annually.

    $813,200 spent
    49% of program spending
  2. Education and community engagementthe friends' educational offerings are intentionally inclusive and designed to engage participants of all ages, abilities, and backgrounds. The friends provide free, hands-on, curriculum-based science programming to thousands of area k6 students each year. Additional offerings include summer camps; stem teacher training; and adult classes, lectures, and workshops related to botany, horticulture, and environmental stewardship. The friends also maintain a public horticultural library with more than 6,000 circulating titles. Community engagement includes partnerships with organizations that celebrate diverse cultural traditions and encourage horticultural endeavors, such as cultural festivals and an annual community awards program.

    $533,050 spent$83,157 earned by the program
    32% of program spending
  3. Communication & membershipthe friends' communications and marketing include maintaining a public-facing website for the garden, producing monthly e-newsletters, managing social media, and publishing a quarterly magazine. With more than 2,500 member households, the membership program provides benefits and engagement opportunities while generating financial assistance for the garden.

    $325,345 spent$226,204 earned by the program
    19% of program spending

The 3 programs described on its FY2025 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $1,671,595.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($2.9M) Expenses 100 ($1.9M) Net assets 100 ($18M)2018 Revenue 88 ($2.6M) Expenses 120 ($2.3M) Net assets 95 ($17M)2019 Revenue 98 ($2.9M) Expenses 124 ($2.3M) Net assets 111 ($20M)2020 Revenue 81 ($2.4M) Expenses 107 ($2.0M) Net assets 123 ($22M)2021 Revenue 96 ($2.8M) Expenses 105 ($2.0M) Net assets 138 ($25M)2022 Revenue 89 ($2.6M) Expenses 113 ($2.1M) Net assets 120 ($22M)2023 Revenue 108 ($3.2M) Expenses 130 ($2.4M) Net assets 134 ($24M)2024 Revenue 126 ($3.7M) Expenses 154 ($2.9M) Net assets 148 ($27M)2025 Revenue 135 ($4.0M) Expenses 143 ($2.7M) Net assets 162 ($29M)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Revenue (135)Expenses (143)Net assets (162)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2021 to 2022, from $25M to $22M (−13%).

$18M
$17M
$20M
$22M
$25M
$22M
$24M
$27M
$30M
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2020 7% · 2021 9%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

58% of THE BIRMINGHAM BOTANICAL SOCIETY INC’s revenue is contributions — more earned-revenue than three-quarters of its peers (88% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 2,303 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 0 of the last 9 reported years ran a deficit.

$1.0M
’17
$305k
’18
$534k
’19
$368k
’20
$843k
’21
$474k
’22
$711k
’23
$790k
’24
$1.3M
’25
31
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

Chief executive

Thomas W Underwood

Executive director

As listed on its FY2025 Form 990.

'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Listed283131323232333432
Joined·+6+3+1+0+12+9+9+3
No longer listed·330012885
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 11 funders to 22 funders, grant income rose $262k → $969k.

10 of 45 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 42% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of THE BIRMINGHAM BOTANICAL SOCIETY INC’s funders (the co-funder graph). Top 30 of 45 funders by total. Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

THE BIRMINGHAM BOTANICAL SOCIETY INC leans on a few funders — its largest provides 38% of grant income and the top three 76%; half comes from just 2 funders.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 2 funders to its left

46% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund THE BIRMINGHAM BOTANICAL SOCIETY INC.

38%
largest funder
76%
top three
~4
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 65% · 2018 58% · 2019 62% · 2020 73% · 2021 63% · 2022 50% · 2023 46% — diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

42% of THE BIRMINGHAM BOTANICAL SOCIETY INC's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 76% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y+3y+4y+5y+6y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

96% of THE BIRMINGHAM BOTANICAL SOCIETY INC's grant income comes from Alabama funders.

CT
MO
VA
DE
AL
GA
TX
FL

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’17
’18
’19
’20
’21
’22
’23
Alabama out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $2.1M arriving through sponsors registered in 9 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

THE BIRMINGHAM BOTANICAL SOCIETY INC runs a healthier operating margin than three-quarters of the 1,209 environment nonprofits its size.

Operating margin32% · top quartile
Months of reserve30.7mo · top quartile
Revenue growth (annualized)4% · bottom quartile

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 1,209 environment nonprofits $1M–$10M, FY2025

Organizations like THE BIRMINGHAM BOTANICAL SOCIETY INC

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Alabama

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

62% of spending goes to programs.

Program 62%Management 25%Fundraising 13%

Governance

29
board members
100%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy✓Whistleblower policy✓Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990✓Audited financials

Public support

77%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for THE BIRMINGHAM BOTANICAL SOCIETY INC: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds THE BIRMINGHAM BOTANICAL SOCIETY INC?
THE BIRMINGHAM BOTANICAL SOCIETY INC (Alabama) receives grants from 45 organizations whose IRS filings report $4,943,449 to it, the largest being LUCILLE S BEESON CHAR TR BOND MGMT ($1,857,124). 34 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does THE BIRMINGHAM BOTANICAL SOCIETY INC have?
IRS filings report 45 organizations giving $4,943,449 in grants to THE BIRMINGHAM BOTANICAL SOCIETY INC, 34 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of THE BIRMINGHAM BOTANICAL SOCIETY INC?
LUCILLE S BEESON CHAR TR BOND MGMT is the largest funder on record, with $1,857,124 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like THE BIRMINGHAM BOTANICAL SOCIETY INC find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Alabama. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds Birmingham Botanical Society →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 45 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 22, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing