· Public charity
The Maynard Nexsen Foundation
To support worthwhile charitable causes and supplement the volunteer efforts of maynard nexsen pc employees.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 10 grants below total $125,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $384,034 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $259,034 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k3 grants · $22k
- $10k–50k7 grants · $104k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| BIRMINGHAM MUSEUM OF ART FOUNDATION INC | $33,000 |
| JIMMY RANE FOUNDATION | $15,000 |
| AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY | $15,000 |
| WISH FOR WHEELS | $10,500 |
| BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA GAC | $10,000 |
| RED MOUNTAIN THEATRE COMPANY INC | $10,000 |
| BAPTIST HEALTH CARE FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| ALABAMA SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA MUSICIANS INC | $7,500 |
| NATIONAL MS SOCIETY | $7,500 |
| STATE OF ALABAMA BALLET INC | $6,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $137k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 96% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +33% since the first grant, against +31% for the ones you funded once.
77 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2025, 70 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 78% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $28k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- UOUNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA LAW SCHOOL FOUNDATION5× · 2018–2022 · $200k · revenue +78%
- AHAmerican Heart Association Inc5× · 2017–2022 · $86k · revenue +33%
- JRJIMMY RANE FOUNDATION8× · 2018–2025 · $84k · revenue +177%
Funded once
PROJECT HEALING WATERS FLY FISHING INCone grant, 2024 · $10k · revenue 0%- BGBELLINGRATH GARDENS AND HOME FOUNDATIONone grant, 2024 · $10k · revenue 0%
- TBThe Birmingham Athletic Partnershipgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $10k · revenue +40%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The university foundation is organized to assist and aid the board of trustees of the university of alabama in fulfilling its educational, research, and public service programs and activities.
To work in partnership with families and organizations to ensure that all alabama children (birth to five) get everything they need to develop to their fullest potential.
To promote the preservation and continued development of commercial banking in alabama.
The alabama alliance netowrk works to strengthen and enhance alabama's civic society through research, education, and grantmaking
Alabama sports foundation exists to optimize the athlete experience through performance, education, innovation, and implementation. alabama sports foundation does this with each individual by partnering with teams, clubs, and…
The Organization is a nonprofit community defender providing legal assistance through court appointment to children and other indigent persons.
Coordinate rc&d activity in alabama
The mission of the birmingham bar association is to uphold the strength and integrity of the legal profession, promote justice, foster civility, and support our members through professional development, education, and community engagement.
Obtain optimal health & well-being for all children in alabama, and to provide educational and practice support for its membership so the highest quality of medical care can be achieved.
The alabama best practices center helps teachers and administrators develop the competence, commitment and courage to do whatever it takes to improve student learning.
The mission of Children's of Alabama is to provide the finest pediatric health services to all children in an environment that fosters excellence in research and medical education. Children's will be an advocate for all children and work…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Baptist Health Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is Turning Point Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 38 years old; the field is 17. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
145 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 145 of the 160 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds BIRMINGHAM MUSEUM OF ART FND TUA ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA LAW SCHOOL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds TWG 2021 BIRMINGHAM FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
- Who funds JIMMY RANE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds BIRMINGHAM VOLUNTEER LAWYERS PROGRAM INC ↗
- Who funds RED MOUNTAIN THEATRE COMPANY INC ↗
- Who funds ACS DEVELOPMENT COMPANY II INC ↗
- Who funds GREATER ALABAMA COUNCIL INC BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA ↗
- Who funds SOUTHERN RESEARCH INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds Birmingham Zoo Inc ↗
- Who funds ALABAMA SYMPHONIC ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE STATE OF ALABAMA BALLET INC ↗
- Who funds ALABAMA A&M UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds MCWANE SCIENCE CENTER ↗
- Who funds BIRMINGHAM-SOUTHERN COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds Baptist Health Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds BAPTIST HEALTH CARE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds JUNIOR LEAGUE OF BIRMINGHAM INC ↗
- Who funds JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF ALABAMA INC ↗
- Who funds BIRMINGHAM KIWANIS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE BIRMINGHAM BOTANICAL SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds Impact America ↗
- Who funds YOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSN OF BIRMINGHAM ↗
- Who funds CORNERSTONE SCHOOLS OF ALABAMA INC ↗
- Who funds NAVY SEAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds A G GASTON BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB ↗
- Who funds National Conference for Community and Justice of Alabama ↗
- Who funds Wish for Wheels Inc ↗
- Who funds PROJECT HEALING WATERS FLY FISHING INC ↗
- Who funds BELLINGRATH GARDENS AND HOME FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds EAST ALABAMA MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds The Birmingham Athletic Partnership ↗
- Who funds OAKWOOD UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds REV BIRMINGHAM INC ↗
- Who funds BAPTIST HEALTH FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF CENTRAL ALABAMA INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Protective Life Foundation · The Daniel Foundation of Alabama · Susan Mott Webb Charitable Trust · Robert R Meyer Foundation · Hill Crest Foundation Inc · The Community Foundation of Greater Birmingham · Alabama Power Foundation Inc · Altecstyslinger Foundation · Mike and Gillian Goodrich Foundation · The Joseph S Bruno Charitable Foundation · The Hugh Kaul Foundation · Orlean & Ralph W Beeson Fund
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Maynard Nexsen Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Project Healing Waters Fly Fishing Inc — 46% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Maynard Nexsen Foundation?
Find your warmest path to The Maynard Nexsen Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.