Skip to content

Alabama · Private foundation

Steiner Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$421k
Granted FY2025(still arriving)
21
Grants FY2025
20
Organizations funded FY2024
15%
First-time grantees FY2024
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2025
$5,000
Largest grant, FY2025
$100,000
Organizations funded a year
13 to 20
FY2020 to FY2024
States reached, FY2025
3
Total assets, FY2025
$4.5M
Applications
Takes unsolicited applications
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2024, 15% of the organizations Steiner Foundation funded were first-time grantees, receiving 0% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24
EducationHuman ServicesArts & CultureYouth DevelopmentRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2025still arriving21$421k24%
FY202420$334k15%
FY202317$315k12%
FY202220$264k25%
FY202117$202k29%
FY202013$202kn/a
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Philanthropy$456kHuman Services$441kReligion$295kArts & Culture$271kEnvironment$160kEducation$84kYouth Development$20kFood & Nutrition$13kOther$0

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2020 to FY2025, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

Show all 13 grantees
All grantees of Steiner Foundation by total granted
GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
United Way of Central Alabama Inc$456,00060%
Indian Springs School$50,00021%
Cahaba River Society Inc$32,00061%
Highlands Day School Foundation$18,00050%
YMCA$16,00040%
The Birmingham Botanical Society Inc$15,75060%
Cliff Valley School Inc$15,00030%
Birmingham Landmarks Inc$5,00010%
A G Gaston Boys and Girls Club$5,00010%
Vulcan Park Foundation$1,00020%
Glenn School for Young Children$5001n/a
Birmingham Historical Society$5001n/a
Grace Episcopal Church$1001n/a

What it could do for these grantees

Plus 20 recipients with no EIN on record ($1.1M), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget Steiner Foundation supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUnited Way of Central Alabama Inc: $456,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetIndian Springs School: $50,000 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetCahaba River Society Inc: $32,000 over 6y, 0.9% of budgetHighlands Day School Foundation: $18,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetYMCA: $16,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetThe Birmingham Botanical Society Inc: $15,750 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetCliff Valley School Inc: $15,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetBirmingham Landmarks Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetA G Gaston Boys and Girls Club: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetVulcan Park Foundation: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 10.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Community Foundation of Greater BirminghamAL21.6× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Community Foundation of Greater Birmingham · Mike and Gillian Goodrich Foundation · Susan Mott Webb Charitable Trust · Protective Life Foundation · Alabama Power Foundation Inc · Jones Family Fund · Dunn-French Foundation · Hill Crest Foundation Inc · Altecstyslinger Foundation · The Daniel Foundation of Alabama · McWane Foundation · The Hugh Kaul Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Steiner Foundation with peer funders

About Steiner Foundation

How much does Steiner Foundation give?
Steiner Foundation reported 21 grants totaling $421,085 in its FY2025 IRS filing. It funded between 13 and 20 organizations a year over FY2020 to FY2024.
What does Steiner Foundation fund?
By grant dollars over FY2020 to FY2025, its largest causes are Philanthropy (26%), Human Services (25%), Religion (17%).
Who are Steiner Foundation's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2020 to FY2025: United Way of Central Alabama Inc ($456k), Indian Springs School ($50k), Cahaba River Society Inc ($32k).
Does Steiner Foundation fund new organizations?
In FY2024, 15% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does Steiner Foundation accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it accepts unsolicited grant applications.
Which funders back the same organizations as Steiner Foundation?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include The Community Foundation of Greater Birmingham, Mike and Gillian Goodrich Foundation, Susan Mott Webb Charitable Trust.
Where is Steiner Foundation based?
Steiner Foundation is based in AL.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 34 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Steiner’s filings →

More from the funding graph