· Private foundation
Susan Mott Webb Charitable Trust
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k22 grants · $114k
- $10k–50k50 grants · $625k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $150k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM | $150,000 |
| FREEDOM RAIN INC DBA LOVELADY CENTER | $40,000 |
| UNITED WAY OF CENTRAL ALABAMA | $25,000 |
| MCWANE SCIENCE CENTER | $25,000 |
| RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE | $25,000 |
| BIRMINGHAM LANDMARKS | $20,000 |
| RENEW BIRMINGHAM | $20,000 |
| GLENWOOD INC | $20,000 |
| WOODLAWN UNITED | $15,000 |
| A G GASTON BOYS & GIRLS CLUB | $15,000 |
| ALYS ROBINSON STEPHENS ART CENTER | $15,000 |
| 16TH STREET BAPTIST CHURCH | $15,000 |
| AFFORDABLE COUNSELING THERAPY | $10,000 |
| SIDEWALK FILM CENTER AND CINEMA | $10,000 |
| BIG OAK RANCH INC | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–25, $609k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 88% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +29% since the first grant, against +1% for the ones you funded once.
131 repeat relationships — 61 still active in FY2025, 70 since wound down; 12 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $93k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
UNITED WAY OF CENTRAL ALABAMA INC4× · 2019–2025 · $120k · revenue +38%- RMRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE ALABAMA INC4× · 2020–2023 · $110k · revenue +65%
- GIGLENWOOD INC6× · 2019–2025 · $105k · revenue +75%
Funded once
- RMRED MOUNTAIN CUT FOUNDATIONone grant, 2022 · $20k
- BHBAPTIST HEALTH FOUNDATION INCone grant, 2024 · $20k · revenue 0%
- SMSOUTHERN MUSEUM OF FLIGHT FDN INCone grant, 2024 · $15k · revenue -12%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The Organization is a nonprofit community defender providing legal assistance through court appointment to children and other indigent persons.
To work in partnership with families and organizations to ensure that all alabama children (birth to five) get everything they need to develop to their fullest potential.
Encourage and enhance advocacy and family support services on behalf of individuals suffering from mental illness.
To serve people, build community, pursue justice.
Birmingham corps' mission is to drive fair workforce opportunities and accelerate social change by recruiting, training, and retaining people in birmingham.
Our mission is to speak for the well-being of Alabama's children through research, public awareness, and advocacy.
Alabama Rivers Alliance is a statewide network of groups working to protect and restore all of Alabama's water resources through building partnerships, empowering citizens, and advocating for sound water policy and its enforcement.
The alabama alliance netowrk works to strengthen and enhance alabama's civic society through research, education, and grantmaking
To promote the preservation and continued development of commercial banking in alabama.
Coordinate rc&d activity in alabama
Aids alabama devotes its energy and resources statewide to helping people with hiv/aids live healthy, independent lives and works to prevent the spread of hiv.
To provide quality healthcare and related services to all communities, including the underserved and homeless persons, regardless of language, culture, or financial barriers
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Stair of Birmingham and the most unlike its peers is Vidal Access Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 30 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 26% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 3% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.6% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
167 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 167 of the 227 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF CENTRAL ALABAMA INC ↗
- Who funds RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE ALABAMA INC ↗
- Who funds GLENWOOD INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF CENTRAL ALABAMA ↗
- Who funds MCWANE SCIENCE CENTER ↗
- Who funds BIRMINGHAM LANDMARKS INC ↗
- Who funds RAILROAD PARK FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds MAGIC CITY HARVEST INC ↗
- Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY WORLDWIDE ↗
- Who funds VULCAN PARK FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds MAGIC MOMENTS ↗
- Who funds BROTHER BRYAN MISSION ↗
- Who funds THE FOUNDRY MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds THE BELL CENTER FOR EARLY INTERVENTION PROGRAMS ↗
- Who funds THE EXCEPTIONAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds BIRMINGHAM-SOUTHERN COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds HOLY FAMILY CRISTO REY CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED ABILITY INC ↗
- Who funds ALZHEIMERS OF CENTRAL ALABAMA INC ↗
- Who funds I3 ACADEMY ↗
- Who funds PRESCHOOL PARTNERS ↗
- Who funds YOUTHSERVE INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY GRIEF SUPPORT SERVICE ↗
- Who funds RENEW BIRMINGHAM ↗
- Who funds SMILE-A-MILE ↗
- Who funds THE RESTORATION ACADEMY ↗
- Who funds CORNERSTONE SCHOOLS OF ALABAMA INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds Big Brothers Big Sisters of Greater Birmingham Inc ↗
- Who funds BETTER BASICS INC ↗
- Who funds LAKESHORE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds FIRST LIGHT INC ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF CENTRAL ALABAMA INC ↗
- Who funds Community Care Development Network ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Daniel Foundation of Alabama · Robert R Meyer Foundation · Protective Life Foundation · The Community Foundation of Greater Birmingham · Hill Crest Foundation Inc · The Hugh Kaul Foundation · Mike and Gillian Goodrich Foundation · Alabama Power Foundation Inc · The Joseph S Bruno Charitable Foundation · Orlean & Ralph W Beeson Fund · Altecstyslinger Foundation · The Maynard Nexsen Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Susan Mott Webb Charitable Trust funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.