Skip to content
Plinth

· Community foundation

Walker Area Community Foundation Inc

To serve as a nonprofit dedicated to the nurture and advancement of the community through forming and preserving charitable capital, and using the proceeds of that capital to better the community as a whole.

$8.0M
Granted FY2025still arriving
95
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$700k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Human Services$9.2MHealth$4.4MReligion$4.4MEducation$4.0MFood & Nutrition$3.8MCommunity Improvement$2.1MAnimals$1.3MPhilanthropy$1.3MOther$0
02FY2025 · 95 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k13 grants · $94k
  • $10k–50k42 grants · $1.0M
  • $50k–250k32 grants · $3.2M
  • $250k+8 grants · $3.6M
$37,600
Median grant
4
States reached
$196M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNITEUS INC$700,000
HARTT INC$655,170
RESCUERS UNITED FOR FURBABIES (RUFF)$582,065
THE LINK OF CULLMAN COUNTY$410,000
KING'S HOME$350,000
FRIENDS OF DOWNTOWN JASPER$329,162
ST MARY'S EPISCOPAL CHURCH$303,002
BEVILL STATE COMMUNITY COLLEGE$252,000
FREE WILL BAPTIST CHILDREN'S HOME$242,888
BACKYARD BLESSINGS$217,263
SC FOUNDATION$200,000
HOPE HOUSE CHURCH$159,800
WALKER COUNTY COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY$130,170
WALKER COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY$130,002
FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH OF JASPER$125,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $8.4M) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 87% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Youth Advocate Programs Inc: $133k → 12%BIG OAK RANCH: $840k → 13%Big Oak Ranch: $41k → 18%Youth Advocate Programs Inc: $113k → 12%Big Oak Ranch: $87k → 13%UNITEUS INC: $1.1M → 15%BIG OAK RANCH: $24k → 18%Youth Advocate Programs Inc: $30k → 12%Big Oak Ranch: $60k → 13%UNITEUS INC: $700k → 15%Arley Womens Club: $75k → 18%Big Oak Ranch: $42k → 13%Arley - Smith Lake Senior Outreach: $56k → 18%King's Home: $491k → 7%Big Oak Ranch: $24k → 13%KING'S HOME: $350k → 7%KING'S HOME: $250k → 7%ARLEY WOMENS CLUB: $26k → 18%Arley Women's Club: $23k → 18%THE LOVELADY CENTER: $50k → 16%THE LOVELADY CENTER: $35k → 16%THE FOUNDRY MINISTRIES: $60k → 16%The Foundry Ministries: $50k → 16%The Foundry Ministries: $50k → 16%The Foundry Ministries: $38k → 16%The Arc of Walker County: $130k → 17%The Arc of Walker County: $65k → 17%The Arc of Walker County: $63k → 17%The Arc of Walker County: $40k → 17%The Arc of Walker County: $35k → 17%THE ARC OF WALKER COUNTY: $23k → 17%Children's Aid Society of AL: $21k → 16%HARTT INC: $931k → 17%HARTT INC: $655k → 17%HARTT Inc: $374k → 17%HARTT Inc: $285k → 17%Walker County Children's Policy Council: $44k → 17%Walker County Children's Policy Council: $44k → 17%MISSION OF HOPE: $92k → 16%Mission of Hope: $67k → 16%MISSION OF HOPE: $57k → 16%Mission of Hope: $50k → 16%Mission of Hope: $45k → 16%Mission of Hope: $35k → 16%Mission of Hope: $34k → 16%Mission of Hope: $27k → 16%Mission of Hope: $24k → 16%Alabama Association of Nonprofits: $22k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

MI
IA
PA
CO
VA
TN
NC
AL
GA
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$34M · 130 repeat orgs$2.5M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +22% since the first grant, against +19% for the ones you funded once.

130 repeat relationships — 74 still active in FY2025, 56 since wound down; 19 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

130
58

Total granted

$34M
$1.4M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+22%
+19%

Still filing today

67%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.1M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthEducationArts & CultureCommunity ImprovementAnimalsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HI
    HARTT INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $2.2M · revenue +275% · 100% of their budget
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF DOWNTOWN JASPER
    7× · 2019–2025 · $1.5M · revenue +211% · 75% of their budget
  • BO
    BIG OAK RANCH INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $1.1M · revenue +87%

Funded once

  • WC
    WINSTON COUNTY ARTS COUNCIL
    one grant, 2023 · $158k · revenue -77%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2024 · $97k
  • AL
    AWAKENING LIFE CHURCH
    one grant, 2024 · $86k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Caring for Citizens of Alabama

Social services

Human Services
2
Wings Across Alabama

To educate, empower, and improve services for mental health consumers in the state of alabama.

Education
3
Alabama Regional Medical Services

To provide quality healthcare and related services to all communities, including the underserved and homeless persons, regardless of language, culture, or financial barriers

Health
4
Southeast Alabama Child Advocacy Center

Established to serve as an advocate of children & to reduce the trauma & anxiety of victims of child abuse by providing coordinated multi- disciplinary & human approach to the investigation & interviewing process.

Human Services
5
Alabama Partnership for Children

To work in partnership with families and organizations to ensure that all alabama children (birth to five) get everything they need to develop to their fullest potential.

Education
6
Aids Alabama Inc

Aids alabama devotes its energy and resources statewide to helping people with hiv/aids live healthy, independent lives and works to prevent the spread of hiv.

Health
7
Central Alabama Regional Child Advocacy Center

Provide advocacy services for abused children in Central Alabama.

Crime & Legal
8
West Alabama Childrens Advocacy Center Inc

To provide a child-focused approach to the intervention, treatment, prevention, and prosecution of child abuse cases. to provide free therapy to child abuse victims and age appropriate awareness in our school systems.

Human Services
9
Central Alabama Works

To facilitate implementation of workforce development programs andservices that support economic and job development in the region andthat address the workforce needs of existing businesses and industry.

10
Voices for Alabama's Children

Our mission is to speak for the well-being of Alabama's children through research, public awareness, and advocacy.

Arts & Culture
11
Alabama Healthcare Hall of Fame
Arts & Culture
12
Legal Aid Society of Birmingham

The Organization is a nonprofit community defender providing legal assistance through court appointment to children and other indigent persons.

Crime & Legal

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Alabama Possible and the most unlike its peers is American Diabetes Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 24 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number24%11%<5yr15%11%5–10yr19%22%10–20yr16%23%20–35yr12%15%35–55yr14%19%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value24%24%<5yr15%8%5–10yr19%22%10–20yr16%13%20–35yr12%15%35–55yr14%18%55yr+

The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 11% of your grantees by number, and just 24% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.5% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.5%1/191
the rest of the field
15%
758/5,026

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

132 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 132 of the 212 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

23
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
33
Early backer (in before they grew)
129/132
Grantees still filing
80/132
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

ALABAMA BAPTIST CHILDRENS HOME AND FAMILY MINISTRIES — $1,280,919 · OtherALABAMA BAPTIST CHILDRENS HOME AND FAMILY MINISTRIESBEVILL STATE COMMUNITY COLLEGE — $1,118,949 · OtherBEVILL STATE COMMUNITY COLLEGEST MARY'S EPISCOPAL CHURCH — $955,717 · OtherHOPE HOUSE FAMILY WORSHIP CENTER — $796,077 · OtherFIRST BAPTIST CHURCH OF JASPER — $748,500 · OtherFELLOWSHIP HOUSE INC — $731,704 · OtherJasper City Board of Education — $699,771 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMY — $648,190 · OtherCRISIS CENTER INC — $626,026 · OtherBACKYARD BLESSINGS — $842,884 · Other+113 more — $9,968,571 · Other+113 moreHARTT INC — $2,244,957 · Human ServicesHARTT INCUNITEUS INC — $1,805,000 · Human ServicesUNITEUS INCBIG OAK RANCH INC — $1,130,000 · Human ServicesBIG OAK RANCH INCKings Home Inc — $1,090,560 · Human ServicesKings Home IncJASPER AREA FAMILY SERVICES CENTER INC — $633,260 · Human ServicesJASPER AREA FAMILY SERVICES …MISSION OF HOPE — $470,312 · Human ServicesTHE ARC OF WALKER COUNTY — $381,332 · Human ServicesYOUTH ADVOCATE PROGRAMS INC — $333,274 · Human Services+17 more — $1,212,176 · Human Services+17 moreFRIENDS OF DOWNTOWN JASPER — $1,499,913 · Community ImprovementTHE LINK OF CULLMAN COUNTY INC — $410,000 · Community ImprovementBRIDGE EDUCATIONAL PHILANTHROPY — $318,000 · Community ImprovementDOWNTOWN JASPER BUSINESS ASSOCIATION — $131,380 · Community ImprovementMAIN STREET ALABAMA — $128,855 · Community Improvement+3 more — $65,000 · Community ImprovementSIGHT SAVERS OF AMERICA INC — $535,120 · HealthALABAMA LIONS SIGHT ASSOCIATION INC — $418,880 · HealthCAPSTONE HEALTH — $256,884 · HealthNORTHWEST AL MENTAL HEALTH CENTER — $171,178 · HealthADDIES PLACE CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER OF WINSTON COUNTY — $168,280 · HealthSMILE-A-MILE — $157,000 · HealthWINSTON COUNTY RESCUE SQUAD INC — $140,000 · HealthAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC — $102,500 · HealthLaura Crandall Brown Foundation — $86,500 · Health+11 more — $493,164 · HealthUNITED WAY OF CENTRAL ALABAMA INC — $665,538 · PhilanthropyTHE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR GREATER ATLANTA INC — $311,080 · PhilanthropyNICK'S KIDS FOUNDATION INC — $180,000 · PhilanthropyWALKER AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC — $179,000 · Philanthropy+3 more — $59,300 · PhilanthropyRUFF RESCUERS UNITED FOR FURBABIES — $800,565 · AnimalsWALKER COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY — $375,339 · AnimalsTHE GREATER BIRMINGHAM HUMANE SOCIETY INC — $54,468 · Animals+3 more — $47,300 · AnimalsHEAL Inc — $419,920 · EducationLITERACY COUNCIL OF CENTRAL ALABAMA — $258,700 · EducationPRESCHOOL PARTNERS — $165,332 · EducationTHE LIBERTY LEARNING FOUNDATION — $107,000 · EducationSamford University — $56,000 · Education+6 more — $121,005 · Education
Other$18,417,308Human Services$9,300,871Community Improvement$2,553,148Health$2,529,506Philanthropy$1,394,918Animals$1,277,672Education$1,127,957

Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetHARTT INC — $2,244,957 over 4y, 100% of budgetUNITEUS INC — $1,805,000 over 2y, 32% of budgetFRIENDS OF DOWNTOWN JASPER — $1,499,913 over 7y, 75% of budgetBIG OAK RANCH INC — $1,130,000 over 7y, 3.5% of budgetKings Home Inc — $1,090,560 over 3y, 5.1% of budgetBACKYARD BLESSINGS — $842,884 over 9y, 52% of budgetRUFF RESCUERS UNITED FOR FURBABIES — $800,565 over 2y, 42% of budgetFELLOWSHIP HOUSE INC — $731,704 over 4y, 4.9% of budgetUNITED WAY OF CENTRAL ALABAMA INC — $665,538 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetJASPER AREA FAMILY SERVICES CENTER INC — $633,260 over 8y, 25% of budgetCRISIS CENTER INC — $626,026 over 5y, 4.6% of budgetSABAN CENTER FOUNDATION — $600,000 over 3y, 11% of budgetSIGHT SAVERS OF AMERICA INC — $535,120 over 9y, 2.2% of budgetMISSION OF HOPE — $470,312 over 9y, 32% of budgetHEAL Inc — $419,920 over 9y, 7.9% of budgetALABAMA LIONS SIGHT ASSOCIATION INC — $418,880 over 9y, 14% of budgetWALKER COUNTY COMMUNITY AGENCY INC — $397,094 over 9y, 3.8% of budgetCONCERNED CITIZENS FOR OUR YOUTH INC — $391,388 over 5y, 7.0% of budgetTHE ARC OF WALKER COUNTY — $381,332 over 8y, 2.2% of budgetWALKER COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY — $375,339 over 9y, 69% of budgetYOUTH ADVOCATE PROGRAMS INC — $333,274 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetBRIDGE EDUCATIONAL PHILANTHROPY — $318,000 over 4y, 83% of budgetTHE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR GREATER ATLANTA INC — $311,080 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMASTERS PLAN MINISTRIES INC — $273,325 over 4y, 17% of budgetWALKER COUNTY COALITION FOR THE HOMELESS — $267,105 over 4y, 76% of budgetLITERACY COUNCIL OF CENTRAL ALABAMA — $258,700 over 9y, 5.5% of budgetCAPSTONE HEALTH — $256,884 over 3y, 1.6% of budgetWALKER COUNTY ARTS ALLIANCE INC — $254,072 over 9y, 63% of budgetGREATER BIRMINGHAM HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC — $247,000 over 3y, 1.5% of budgetCITY OF LIGHTS — $232,500 over 4y, 2.5% of budgetWILD ALABAMA INC — $222,945 over 5y, 15% of budgetRAISING ARROWS — $220,677 over 2y, 16% of budgetTHE FOUNDRY MINISTRIES INC — $215,800 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetMISSION 34 INC — $189,400 over 2y, 99% of budgetNICK'S KIDS FOUNDATION INC — $180,000 over 4y, 4.3% of budgetWALKER AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC — $179,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetHOPE FOR WOMEN LLC — $177,626 over 5y, 40% of budgetBundles of Hope Inc — $174,100 over 6y, 2.5% of budgetNORTHWEST AL MENTAL HEALTH CENTER — $171,178 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetADDIES PLACE CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER OF WINSTON COUNTY — $168,280 over 2y, 22% of budgetPRESCHOOL PARTNERS — $165,332 over 4y, 4.6% of budgetWINSTON COUNTY ARTS COUNCIL — $157,999 over 1y, 15% of budgetKIDS PLAY ALABAMA — $157,420 over 4y, 71% of budgetSMILE-A-MILE — $157,000 over 8y, 1.6% of budgetWINSTON COUNTY RESCUE SQUAD INC — $140,000 over 3y, 13% of budgetBLACK WARRIOR COUNCIL — $134,538 over 8y, 2.1% of budgetARLEY WOMENS CLUB INC — $133,209 over 4y, 97% of budgetDOWNTOWN JASPER BUSINESS ASSOCIATION — $131,380 over 2y, 57% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HARTT INC
  • Who funds UNITEUS INC
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF DOWNTOWN JASPER
  • Who funds BIG OAK RANCH INC
  • Who funds Kings Home Inc
  • Who funds BACKYARD BLESSINGS
  • Who funds RUFF RESCUERS UNITED FOR FURBABIES
  • Who funds FELLOWSHIP HOUSE INC
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF CENTRAL ALABAMA INC
  • Who funds JASPER AREA FAMILY SERVICES CENTER INC
  • Who funds CRISIS CENTER INC
  • Who funds SABAN CENTER FOUNDATION
  • Who funds SIGHT SAVERS OF AMERICA INC
  • Who funds MISSION OF HOPE
  • Who funds HEAL Inc
  • Who funds ALABAMA LIONS SIGHT ASSOCIATION INC
  • Who funds THE LINK OF CULLMAN COUNTY INC
  • Who funds WALKER COUNTY COMMUNITY AGENCY INC
  • Who funds CONCERNED CITIZENS FOR OUR YOUTH INC
  • Who funds THE ARC OF WALKER COUNTY
  • Who funds WALKER COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY
  • Who funds YOUTH ADVOCATE PROGRAMS INC
  • Who funds BRIDGE EDUCATIONAL PHILANTHROPY
  • Who funds THE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR GREATER ATLANTA INC
  • Who funds MASTERS PLAN MINISTRIES INC
  • Who funds WALKER COUNTY COALITION FOR THE HOMELESS
  • Who funds LITERACY COUNCIL OF CENTRAL ALABAMA
  • Who funds CAPSTONE HEALTH
  • Who funds WALKER COUNTY ARTS ALLIANCE INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Alabama Power Foundation IncAL112.4× affinity74 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Alabama Power Foundation Inc · The Community Foundation of Greater Birmingham · The Daniel Foundation of Alabama · Protective Life Foundation · Susan Mott Webb Charitable Trust · Hill Crest Foundation Inc · Robert R Meyer Foundation · United Way of Central Alabama Inc · Altecstyslinger Foundation · Community Partnership of Alabama Inc · Mike and Gillian Goodrich Foundation · Cawaco Resource Conservation & Development Council Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Walker Area Community Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    40report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Walker Area Community Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Walker Area Community Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 212 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph