· Private foundation
Rim Institute
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k22 grants · $75k
- $10k–50k6 grants · $72k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| NEW PATHWAYS FOR YOUTH | $20,000 |
| TRINIDAD YOUTH CLUB | $12,000 |
| PANADERO SKI CORP | $10,000 |
| CARE AND SHARE FOOD BANK | $10,000 |
| FISHERS PEAK SOUP KITCHEN | $10,000 |
| ROCKY MOUNTAIN PBS | $10,000 |
| ARIZONA ANIMAL WELFARE LEAGUE | $7,500 |
| ROCKY MOUNTAIN INSTITUTE | $5,000 |
| PHOENIX COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL | $5,000 |
| TRINIDAD TRAILS ALLIANCE | $5,000 |
| TELLURIDE MOUNTAIN CLUB | $5,000 |
| MAIN STREET LIVE | $5,000 |
| ST MARY'S FOOD BANK | $5,000 |
| PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF AZ | $5,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $5,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $19k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
26 repeat relationships — 21 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $30k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- PSPANADERO SKI CORPORATION5× · 2019–2025 · $31k · revenue +500%
- PPPLANNED PARENTHOOD ARIZONA INC5× · 2017–2025 · $16k · revenue +9%
- PCPHOENIX COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL2× · 2024–2025 · $10k · revenue +17%
Funded once
FRIENDS OF THE WORLD FOOD PROGRAM INCgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue +361%- TNTHE NETHERLAND-AMERICA FOUNDATION INCone grant, 2018 · $10k · revenue -5%
- IRISLAMIC RELIEF USAone grant, 2017 · $9k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To lead, serve and collaborate to mobilize enduring philanthropy for a better arizona.
United Food Bank unites communities to alleviate hunger.
To protect and enhance the natural resources of puerto rico.
See schedule ouniversity corporation for atmospheric research (ucar), on behalf of, and in cooperation with its member university members, is engaged in the management of long-term atmospheric and related research and educational…
The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.
The santa fe community foundation inspires philanthropic generosity, strengthens nonprofits, and fosters positive change to build a more vibrant, healthy, and resilient region. the foundation's vision is a thriving northern new mexico,…
To perform the functions of, or to carry out the purposes of the arizona community foundation, an az nonprofit corporation, so long as the arizona community foundation, inc. remains a qualified organization.
To make sexual and reproductive healthcare accessible to everyone
Wri is committed to creating change that improves people's lives and ensures the natural world can thrive. (see schedule o)wri's bold vision requires a formula for success we call "count it. change it. scale it.":- count it: our work is…
To connect, support and inform efforts to improve the health of individuals and communities in arizona.
Ahip is the national trade association representing the health insurance industry. ahip's members provide health care coverage, services and solutions to more than 200 million americans. we are committed to market-based solutions and…
Be a catalyst! Ignite our community's passion for nature and science.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Colorado Gives Foundation and the most unlike its peers is The Ruthmere Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 27 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 12% of your grantees by number, and just 18% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
33 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 33 of the 48 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds New Pathways For Youth ↗
- Who funds PANADERO SKI CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds YOUTH CLUB OF TRINIDAD INC ↗
- Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD ARIZONA INC ↗
- Who funds Telluride Mountain Club ↗
- Who funds THE ARIZONA ANIMAL WELFARE LEAGUE ↗
- Who funds MAIN STREET LIVE LTD ↗
- Who funds Care and Share Inc ↗
- Who funds ROCKY MOUNTAIN PUBLIC MEDIA INC ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF THE WORLD FOOD PROGRAM INC ↗
- Who funds PHOENIX COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds THE NETHERLAND-AMERICA FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds NOAH'S ARK ANIMAL WELFARE ASSOC ↗
- Who funds ST MARY'S FOOD BANK ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds Rocky Mountain Institute ↗
- Who funds VALLEY OF THE SUN UNITED WAY ↗
- Who funds THE AMERICAN HUMANIST ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds DIOCESAN COUNCIL FOR THE SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL DIOCESE PHOENIX ↗
- Who funds TRINIDAD COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds TRUSTEES OF PHILLIPS ACADEMY ↗
- Who funds CIRCLE THE CITY ↗
- Who funds MUSICAL INSTRUMENT MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds NOTMYKID ↗
- Who funds Arizonans for Children Inc ↗
- Who funds SECULAR COMMUNITIES FOR ARIZONA INC ↗
- Who funds Solid Rock Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Arizona Community Foundation · BAR NI Community Service Fund · American Express Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Charities Aid Foundation America · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Endowment Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Rim Institute funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.