· Private foundation
The Moulton Family Charitable Trust
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k28 grants · $119k
- $10k–50k9 grants · $120k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CATHEDRAL CHURCH OF THE ADVENT | $35,000 |
| TURNING POINT USA | $15,000 |
| ST LUKE'S EPISCOPAL CHURCH | $10,000 |
| BIG OAK RANCH | $10,000 |
| TELLURIDE MOUNTAIN SCHOOL | $10,000 |
| VESTAVIA HILLS CITY SCHOOL FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| FRIENDS OF CAMP MYSTIC | $10,000 |
| SAMARITANS PURSE | $10,000 |
| CHRIST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH | $10,000 |
| CRIPPLED CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION | $7,500 |
| ST PAUL'S EPISCOPAL CHURCH | $7,500 |
| SALVATION ARMY | $5,000 |
| UAB SCHOOL OF NURSING | $5,000 |
| JEFFERSON COUNTY DEPT OF HUMAN RESOURCES | $5,000 |
| THE FOUNDRY | $5,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–22, $31k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 97% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
45 repeat relationships — 31 still active in FY2025, 14 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 83% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $41k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TMTELLURIDE MOUNTAIN SCHOOL INC6× · 2020–2025 · $47k · revenue +19%
- QCQuarterbacking Children's Health Foundation8× · 2017–2025 · $43k · revenue +170%
- BOBIG OAK RANCH INC7× · 2017–2025 · $37k · revenue +105%
Funded once
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2024 · $10k
- MUMAUI UNITED WAYgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue +188%
- FAFEEDING AMERICAone grant, 2020 · $5k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To be the love of christ to uganda's orphaned and vulnerable children, equipping them to become authentic godly leaders that transform generations
Children to love is focused on meeting the needs of the suffering children of the world, providing help and assistance to empower 'the least of these'(matthew 25:40). through education, spiritual teaching, economic support, physical…
The tim tebow foundation exists to bring faith, hope and love to those needing a brighter day in their darkest hour of need.
Christianity Today is a global community inspired by evangelical conviction to advance the stories and ideas of the kingdom of God. Our mission is to elevate the storytellers and sages of the global church.
The mission of christian services for children in alabama is to show the love of christ by providing counseling and other related services to children and their families.
Curesearch's mission is to fund & support targeted & innovative cancer research with measurable results, & to be the authoritative source of information & resources for all those affected by children's cancer. see schedule o for…
To work in partnership with families and organizations to ensure that all alabama children (birth to five) get everything they need to develop to their fullest potential.
The mission of Alabama Children's Hospital Foundation (The Foundation) is to support the activities and mission of the Hospital (CHA).
Our mission is to speak for the well-being of Alabama's children through research, public awareness, and advocacy.
Children at heart ministries is a family of christian ministries that exists to honor god and build a better world by serving children and strengthening families.
Reaching out to children in east africa living in destitute circumstances, both physically and with the gospel of jesus christ, to enable them to grow and develop in a secure environment.
Feeding the spiritual and physical hunger, especially in at-risk children.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Turning Point Usa Inc and the most unlike its peers is Rucker Collier Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 27 years old; the field is 15. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 23% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
36 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 36 of the 67 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds TELLURIDE MOUNTAIN SCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds Quarterbacking Children's Health Foundation ↗
- Who funds BIG OAK RANCH INC ↗
- Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE CENTER FOR EXECUTIVE LEADERSHIP INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF CENTRAL ALABAMA INC ↗
- Who funds BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION OF ALA ↗
- Who funds Rucker Collier Foundation ↗
- Who funds TUM TUM TREE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds The Children's Hospital of Alabama ↗
- Who funds SIBYL TEMPLE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds DOWNTOWN JIMMIE HALE MISSION ↗
- Who funds TELLURIDE ADAPTIVE SPORTS PROGRAM ↗
- Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
- Who funds TURNING POINT USA INC ↗
- Who funds TURNING POINT FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds HONEYWORD FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds CORNERSTONE SCHOOLS OF ALABAMA INC ↗
- Who funds The Monday Morning Quarterback Club ↗
- Who funds CARRYWELL ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF ALBANY INC ↗
- Who funds FEED THE CHILDREN INC ↗
- Who funds VESTAVIA HILLS LIBRARY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds MARION MEDICAL MISSION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Community Foundation of Greater Birmingham · Hill Crest Foundation Inc · Burton Family Foundation · Debardeleben Foundation Inc · Alabama Power Foundation Inc · The Robert and Lois Luckie Charitable Foundation · The James Milton and Sallie R Johnson Foundation · Campbell Estelle S Char Foundation · Dunn-French Foundation · Robert R Meyer Foundation · The Maynard Nexsen Foundation · Susan Mott Webb Charitable Trust
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Moulton Family Charitable Trust funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Best Buddies International Inc — 4% of income from government
- Feed the Children Inc — 1% of income from government
- Big Dog Ranch Rescue Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.