· Private foundation
Raymund Foundation Inc
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k11 grants · $38k
- $10k–50k9 grants · $140k
- $50k–250k3 grants · $256k
- $250k+1 grant · $250k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| GULF COAST JEWISH FAMILY & COMMUNITY SERVICES | $250,000 |
| CASA - COMMUNITY ACTION STOPS ABUSE INC | $105,100 |
| LIFT ACADEMY | $100,400 |
| USF FOUNDATION | $50,000 |
| TELLURIDE FOUNDATION | $30,000 |
| CHABAD JEWISH CENTER OF GREATER ST PETERSBURG | $25,000 |
| COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF TAMPA BAY | $25,000 |
| ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE | $10,000 |
| RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF TAMPA BAY | $10,000 |
| SAN MIGUEL RESOURCE CENTER | $10,000 |
| OJAI ART CENTER | $10,000 |
| ACT (ARTS CONSERVATORY FOR TEENS) | $10,000 |
| ACADEMY PREP CENTER OF ST PETERSBURG | $10,000 |
| THE DALI MUSEUM | $8,000 |
| TELLURIDE JEWISH COMMUNITY | $6,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $19k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 32% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +71% since the first grant, against +37% for the ones you funded once.
43 repeat relationships — 16 still active in FY2024, 27 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $26k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
UNIVERSITY OF OREGON FOUNDATION5× · 2017–2021 · $1.1M · revenue +182%
GULF COAST JEWISH FAMILY AND COMMUNITY SERVICES INC6× · 2019–2024 · $318k · revenue +73%- TBTAMPA BAY WATCH INC4× · 2018–2023 · $302k · revenue +62%
Funded once
- TDTHE DALI MUSEUM (IE THE SALVADOR DALI MUSEUM INC)one grant, 2019 · $150k
- FAFEEDING AMERICA TAMPA BAY INCgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $125k · revenue +37%
- JHJOHNS HOPKINS ALL CHILDRENS HOSP FDone grant, 2017 · $125k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The florida state university foundation enhances the academic mission and vision of florida state university through its organized fundraising activities and funds management. the fsu foundation accomplishes its mission by fostering…
To promote, encourage and enhance research activities at the university of south florida.
To promote visitation to florida by strengthening florida's share of the global travel market with the goal of maximizing the economic impact of travel and tourism to florida.
To encourage, solicit, receive and administer gifts and bequests of property and funds for scientific, educational and charitable purposes, all for the advancement of florida international university and its objectives (see schedule o for…
The tampa bay partnership is a privately funded, ceo-driven regional advocacy organization, committed to creating a unified, competitive and prosperous tampa bay.
Florida institute of technology's mission is to provide high-quality education to a culturally diverse student body in order to prepare students for entering the global workforce, seeking higher-education opportunities, and serving within…
See schedule ocollaboratory is a community foundation with an evolved mission committed to coordinating the solving of southwest florida's major social problems by 2040. since our founding in 1976, we have been supporting local causes and…
Working in partnership with state business leaders to secure florida's future.
Embry-riddle is the world leader in aviation and aerospace higher education. its mission is to teach the science, practice and business of aviation and aerospace, preparing students for productive careers and leadership roles in business,…
The mission of florida grand opera is to enrich people's lives through an awareness and deeper appreciation of opera while supporting the operations of the greater miami opera and the opera guild, inc. by expanding its reach to diverse…
The santa fe institute is a transdisciplinary research community that expands the boundaries of scientific understanding. its aim is to discover, comprehend, and communicate the common fundamental principles in complex physical,…
The fiu research foundation provides means by which discoveries, inventions, processes, and work products of faculty, staff and students of the university may be patented, developed, applied and utilized in order that the results of such…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Foundation of Tampa Bay Inc and the most unlike its peers is American Diabetes Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 40 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 27% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 17% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
56 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 56 of the 98 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF OREGON FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds GULF COAST JEWISH FAMILY AND COMMUNITY SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds TAMPA BAY WATCH INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY ACTION STOPS ABUSE INC ↗
- Who funds University of South Florida Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds SALVADOR DALI MUSEUM INC ↗
- Who funds TELLURIDE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds FEEDING AMERICA TAMPA BAY INC ↗
- Who funds FLORIDA HOLOCAUST MUSEUM INC ↗
- Who funds ACADEMY PREP CENTER OF ST PETERSBURG ↗
- Who funds Jewish Federation of Pinellas and Pasco Counties FL Inc ↗
- Who funds Telluride Mountain Club ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF TAMPA BAY INC ↗
- Who funds OXFORD CONSORTIUM FOR HUMAN RIGHTS INC ↗
- Who funds FLORIDA COUNCIL ON ECONOMIC EDUCATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE FLORIDA ORCHESTRA ↗
- Who funds SAN MIGUEL RESOURCE CENTER (SMRC) ↗
- Who funds CHAMBER ORCHESTRA OF SARASOTA INC ↗
- Who funds COOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC ↗
- Who funds Sarasota Opera Association Inc ↗
- Who funds ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE ↗
- Who funds Artz 4 Life Academy Inc ↗
- Who funds RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF TAMPA BAY INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Pinellas Community Foundation · Top Jewish Foundation Inc · Vinik Family Foundation · Community Foundation of Tampa Bay Inc · Rays Baseball Foundation Inc · Sonia Raymund Foundation Inc · Thomas A & Mary S James Foundation · Publix Super Markets Charities Inc · Gulf Coast Community Foundation Inc · Milkey Family Foundation Inc · Westphal Family Foundation Inc · Francis and Gertrude Levett Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Raymund Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Gulf Coast Jewish Family and Community Services Inc — 15% of income from government
- Community Action Stops Abuse Inc — 13% of income from government
- University of Miami — 5% of income from government
- Big Brothers Big Sisters of Tampa Bay Inc — 3% of income from government
- Feeding America Tampa Bay Inc — 2% of income from government
- Florida Holocaust Museum Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Raymund Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to Raymund Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.