Skip to content

California · Nonprofit

Foothill Conservancy

Foothill Conservancy (California) receives grants from 12 organizations whose IRS filings report $407,566 to it, the largest being AMERICAN RIVERS INC ($122,690). 9 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 53% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.

Revenue FY2025
$111k
Funders on record
12
Grants received
$408k
Net assets
$16k
9/12 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 63%
01What it does

What Foothill Conservancy does

Mission

Protect, restore, sustain natural and human environment.

As stated on its FY2025 Form 990-EZ.

Programs

  1. River and Watershed Protection and Conservation: Educating the publicand particpating in partnerships to protect, restore, and sustain theMokelumne river and watershed.

    $60,030 spent
    81% of program spending
  2. Sustainable Land Use and Communities: Educating the public and participatingin partnerships to protect, restore, and sustain the natural landand historical and cultural community resources in Amador and Calaveras Counties.

    $13,985 spent
    19% of program spending

The 2 programs described on its FY2024 Form 990-EZ. Program spending in total: $74,015.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($184k) Expenses 100 ($161k) Net assets 100 ($58k)2018 Revenue 95 ($174k) Expenses 118 ($190k) Net assets 72 ($42k)2019 Revenue 97 ($179k) Expenses 87 ($140k) Net assets 135 ($79k)2020 Revenue 71 ($130k) Expenses 91 ($146k) Net assets 107 ($63k)2021 Revenue 80 ($147k) Expenses 89 ($144k) Net assets 112 ($65k)2022 Revenue 71 ($131k) Expenses 83 ($134k) Net assets 108 ($63k)2023 Revenue 67 ($124k) Expenses 55 ($88k) Net assets 169 ($99k)2024 Revenue 36 ($66k) Expenses 87 ($140k) Net assets 42 ($25k)2025 Revenue 61 ($111k) Expenses 74 ($120k) Net assets 28 ($16k)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Revenue (61)Expenses (74)Net assets (28)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2023 to 2024, from $103k to $29k (−72%).

$62k
$43k
$81k
$85k
$69k
$66k
$103k
$29k
$23k
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2021 11% · 2022 11% · 2023 3%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

86% of Foothill Conservancy’s revenue is contributions — about as donation-reliant as the typical peer (88% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 4,629 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 5 of the last 9 reported years ran a deficit.

$23k
’17
−$16k
’18
$39k
’19
−$16k
’20
$3k
’21
−$3k
’22
$36k
’23
−$74k
’24
−$8k
’25
2.5
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

Chief executive

Craig Baracco

Executive Director

As listed on its FY2024 Form 990-EZ.

201920202021202220232024
Listed111313121110
Joined·+3+3+3+3+4
No longer listed·13445
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base held at 6 funders, grant income fell $51k → $34k.

5 of 12 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 53% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of Foothill Conservancy’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

Foothill Conservancy leans on a few funders — its largest provides 30% of grant income and the top three 69%; half comes from just 2 funders.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 2 funders to its left

87% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund Foothill Conservancy.

30%
largest funder
69%
top three
~5
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 37% · 2018 40% · 2019 46% · 2020 47% · 2021 51% · 2022 49% · 2023 40% — growing more concentrated.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

67% of Foothill Conservancy's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 75% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y+3y+4y+5y+6y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

53% of Foothill Conservancy's grant income arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors, whose addresses record where the money is held rather than where the donor is. Of the $191k that is directly attributable, 64% of it comes from funders outside California, across 3 states.

IL
CA
DC

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’17
’18
’19
’20
’21
’22
’23
California out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $217k arriving through sponsors registered in 5 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

Foothill Conservancy's revenue fell 39% between 2017 and 2025.

Operating margin−7% · bottom quartile
Revenue growth (annualized)−6% · bottom quartile

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 2,433 environment nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2025

Government funding Foothill Conservancy receives

Grants and contracts to this organization from federal (USASpending) and state checkbooks, reconciled to its EIN. $25k on record.

Federal$25k
grants $25kcontracts $0
Top agencies
  • Department of Agriculture$25k

Federal grants vs contracts are distinguished; state line items keep their reported category. Matched by name + geography (the BMF), so coverage is partial and precision-first.

Organizations like Foothill Conservancy

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In California

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Public support

100%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

CA

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for Foothill Conservancy: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds Foothill Conservancy?
Foothill Conservancy (California) receives grants from 12 organizations whose IRS filings report $407,566 to it, the largest being AMERICAN RIVERS INC ($122,690). 9 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 53% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.
How many funders does Foothill Conservancy have?
IRS filings report 12 organizations giving $407,566 in grants to Foothill Conservancy, 9 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of Foothill Conservancy?
AMERICAN RIVERS INC is the largest funder on record, with $122,690 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like Foothill Conservancy find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in California. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds Foothill Conservancy →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 12 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing