· Private foundation
Ahs Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2021–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k68 grants · $234k
- $10k–50k16 grants · $268k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| WEECYCLE | $50,000 |
| THE DELORES PROJECT | $30,000 |
| BIENVENIDOS FOOD BANK | $30,000 |
| HOPE HAS NO BORDERS | $30,000 |
| ANCHOR CENTER FOR BLIND CHILDREN | $30,000 |
| LAKE ERIE INK | $25,000 |
| EBB FLOW ARTS | $15,000 |
| NAACP LEGAL DEFENSE FUND | $13,000 |
| TRANSGENDER LAW CENTER | $12,500 |
| ORION SOCIETY | $12,000 |
| SIERRA FOOTHILL CONSERVANCY | $10,000 |
| GIANT STEPS THERAPEUTIC EQUESTRAIN | $10,000 |
| PRETERM | $10,000 |
| THE TREVOR PROJECT | $10,000 |
| VILLAGE OF HEALING | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY22–25, $336k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 62% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +7% since the first grant, against +2% for the ones you funded once.
79 repeat relationships — 70 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 14 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 73% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $147k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- WWEECYCLE4× · 2022–2025 · $170k · revenue +21%
- RRECLAIM3× · 2022–2024 · $125k · revenue +15%
- IWINTERFAITH WORKING GROUP3× · 2022–2024 · $100k · revenue +173%
Funded once
- WUWASHBURN UNIVERSITYone grant, 2022 · $25k
- BBBIRTHING BEAUTIFUL COMMUNITIESgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $20k · revenue +194%
- EFEBB & FLOW ARTSone grant, 2022 · $15k · revenue -4%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.
To establish and promote programs to protect the global climate, forests, wildlife and the natural environment, through research, advocacy, and investigation.
See schedule okqed serves the people of northern california with a community-supported alternative to commercial media, providing the knowledge needed to make informed decisions; convening community dialogue; bringing the arts to everyone;…
The aquarium of the pacific's mission is to instill a sense of wonder, respect, and stewardship for the pacific ocean, its inhabitants, and ecosystems.
The Climate Center is a climate and energy policy nonprofit working to rapidly reduce climate pollution at scale, starting in California.
Grist is an independent, non profit media organization dedicated to reporting on climate change.
Arbor research collaborative for health is committed to improving patient care through research that shapes medical policies and practice. in particular, arbor research conducts health outcomes research on chronic disease and end-stage…
Be a catalyst! Ignite our community's passion for nature and science.
Eastern national promotes the public's understanding and support of america's national parks and other public trust partners by providing quality educational experiences, products and services.
The purpose of the water research foundation (wrf) is a definitive research organization to advance the science of all things water to better meet the evolving needs of its subscribers and the water sector. to engage exclusively in…
Marin humane transforms lives through exceptional animal care, humane education, and advocacy. every day, marin humane inspires compassion and positive relationships between people and animals.
Mentis provides bilingual professional mental health services to people throughout the county of every age, stage, and income level.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Soul Fire Farm Institute Inc and the most unlike its peers is Open Arms Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 38 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 6% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
90 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 90 of the 118 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds WEECYCLE ↗
- Who funds RECLAIM ↗
- Who funds INTERFAITH WORKING GROUP ↗
- Who funds GIRLS ON THE RUN OF THE ROCKIES ↗
- Who funds LAKE ERIE INK ↗
- Who funds HOPE HAS NO BORDERS ↗
- Who funds PINE STREET INN INC ↗
- Who funds TREVOR PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds SLIDE RANCH ↗
- Who funds MOUNTAIN PLAY ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds MAUI NUI BOTANICAL GARDENS INC ↗
- Who funds THE DELORES PROJECT ↗
- Who funds DELTA GAMMA ANCHOR CENTER FOR BLIND CHILDREN ↗
- Who funds Northwest Family Assistance Center ↗
- Who funds Maui Pops Orchestra Inc ↗
- Who funds Side By Side ↗
- Who funds EQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE ↗
- Who funds Transgender Law Center ↗
- Who funds FAIRMOUNT MONTESSORI ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds BIRTHING BEAUTIFUL COMMUNITIES ↗
- Who funds Black Mamas Matter Alliance Inc ↗
- Who funds SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds CHOICE NETWORK INC ↗
- Who funds VILLAGE OF HEALING ↗
- Who funds HESPERIAN HEALTH GUIDES ↗
- Who funds RAILS TO TRAILS CONSERVANCY ↗
- Who funds Earshot Jazz Society of Seattle ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF THE AUBERRY LIBRARY ↗
- Who funds THE ORION SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds HOPEWELL ↗
- Who funds EBB & FLOW ARTS ↗
- Who funds Poverello House ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Char and Chuck Fowler Family Foundation · The Cleveland Foundation · The George Gund Foundation · The Louise H & David S Ingalls Fdn · Jewish Federation of Cleveland · Marin Community Foundation · The Hershey Foundation · East Bay Community Foundation · Woodruff Foundation · George Codrington Fdnhirtlena · Emma R Fox Char Trust Mut Fds · The Helen F & Louis Stolier Family Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Ahs Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Mercy Corps — 47% of income from government
- Pine Street Inn Inc — 11% of income from government
- City Year Inc — 11% of income from government
- Citizen Schools Inc — 8% of income from government
- The Orion Society Inc — 2% of income from government
- Regional Arts & Culture Council — 1% of income from government
- Young Musicians & Artists Inc — 0% of income from government
- Oregon Shakespeare Festival Association Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Ahs Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Ahs Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.