Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The George F Jewett Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$463k
Granted FY2024still arriving
15
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20192024.

Environment$690kPhilanthropy$518kHuman Services$415kArts & Culture$400kEducation$279kAnimals$150kHealth$150kFood & Nutrition$150kOther$0
02FY2024 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k14 grants · $363k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $100k
$25,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$20M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CALIFORNIA COLLEGE OF THE ARTS$100,000
THE SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION$42,500
INLAND NORTHWEST LAND CONSERVANCY$40,000
INNOVIA (FORMERLY INLAND NORTHWEST COMMUNITY FOUNDATION)$30,000
WESTERN RIVERS CONSERVANCY$25,000
PACIFIC FOREST TRUST INC$25,000
VOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA OF EASTERN WASHINGTON AND NORTHERN IDAHO$25,000
SECOND HARVEST INLAND NORTHWEST$25,000
MARINE MAMMAL CENTER$25,000
SNAP (SPOKANE NEIGHBORHOOD ACTION PROGRAM)$25,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF GREATER WASHINGTON AND NORTH IDAHO$25,000
CONSERVATION NORTHWEST$25,000
VANESSA BEHAN CRISIS NURSERY$20,000
YWCA OF SPOKANE$20,000
SPOKANE SYMPHONY SOCIETY$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–24, $180k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%EPISCOPAL COMMUNITY SERVICES: $10k → 10%EPISCOPAL COMMUNITY SERVICES: $10k → 10%EPISCOPAL COMMUNITY SERVICES: $10k → 10%EPISCOPAL COMMUNITY SERVICES: $10k → 10%EPISCOPAL COMMUNITY SERVICES: $10k → 10%YWCA OF SPOKANE: $20k → 12%YWCA OF SPOKANE: $20k → 12%YWCA OF SPOKANE: $20k → 12%YWCA OF SPOKANE: $20k → 12%YWCA OF SPOKANE: $20k → 12%YWCA OF SPOKANE: $20k → 12%AT THE CROSSROADS: $5k → 10%AT THE CROSSROADS: $5k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 7% of The George F Jewett Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

The George F Jewett Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 9.8% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.3M · 17 repeat orgs$81k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +35% since the first grant, against -17% for the ones you funded once.

17 repeat relationships — 13 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
3

Total granted

$2.3M
$81k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+35%
-17%

Still filing today

88%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureEnvironmentHuman ServicesEducationAnimalsFood & NutritionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SF
    SAN FRANCISCO BALLET ASSOCIATION
    5× · 2019–2023 · $250k · revenue +33%
  • IN
    INLAND NORTHWEST LAND TRUST
    6× · 2019–2024 · $240k · revenue +290%
  • CC
    CALIFORNIA COLLEGE OF THE ARTS
    6× · 2019–2024 · $238k · revenue +24%

Funded once

  • SF
    SAN FRANCISCO MUSEUM OF MODERN ART
    one grant, 2019 · $40k · revenue -17%
  • EC
    EASTSIDE COLLEGE PREPARATORY SCHOOL INCgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $31k · revenue +114%
  • OP
    ONE PURPOSE SCHOOL INC
    one grant, 2019 · $10k · revenue -99%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Fsc I&P

Fsc i&p promotes environmentally appropriate, socially beneficial, and economically viable management of the world's forests. this mission aligns with the forest stewardship council (fsc), its network of offices, and other organizations.…

Philanthropy
2
Eastern National

Eastern national promotes the public's understanding and support of america's national parks and other public trust partners by providing quality educational experiences, products and services.

Recreation & Sports
3
Aquarium of the Pacific Corporation

The aquarium of the pacific's mission is to instill a sense of wonder, respect, and stewardship for the pacific ocean, its inhabitants, and ecosystems.

Animals
4
Sacramento Zoological Society

The sacramento zoo inspires appreciation, respect and a connection with wildlife and nature through education, recreation and conservation.

Animals
5
Great Peninsula Conservancy

Preserve in perpetuity the natural habitats, rural landscapes, and open spaces of the great peninsula of washington's puget sound.

Environment
6
University Cooperative School

We take a joyful, community-oriented approach to raising engaged citizens, deep learners, and brave adventurers with the skills, creativity, and heart needed to better the world.

7
Siff

Siff is a seattle-based 501(c)(3) arts nonprofit dedicated to the creation of vibrant experiences and spaces that champion film discovery and arts education.

Youth Development
8
Association of Washington Cities

The association of washington cities builds connections between our state's diverse cities and towns, while providing our members with the support needed to thrive through delivery of data-driven education, nationally recognized pooling…

9
Los Angeles Conservancy

The los angeles conservancy is a nonprofit membership organization that works through education and advocacy to recognize, preserve, and revitalize the historic architectural and cultural resources of los angeles county.

Arts & Culture
10
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

11
The Seattle Academy of Arts & Sciences

Seattle academy is a dynamic community that challenges students to question, imagine, and create in order to contribute to a changing world.

Education
12
Washington Society of Certified Public a

We are a community of cpas and financial professionals cultivating authentic relationships, unique learning experiences, and purposeful advocacy for our future.

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The San Francisco Foundation and the most unlike its peers is San Francisco Museum of Modern Art. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/20
Grantees still filing
15/20
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

INLAND NORTHWEST LAND TRUST — $240,000 · EnvironmentINLAND NORTHWEST LAN…WESTERN RIVERS CONSERVANCY — $150,000 · EnvironmentWESTERN RIVERS CONSE…CONSERVATION NW — $150,000 · EnvironmentCONSERVATION NWTHE SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION — $328,100 · PhilanthropyTHE SAN FRANCISCO F…Innovia Foundation — $190,000 · PhilanthropyInnovia FoundationThe Pacific Forest Trust Incorporated — $150,000 · OtherThe Pacific Forest Trust Incorpor…VOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA OF EASTERN WASHINGTON AND NORTHERN IDAHO — $150,000 · OtherVOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA OF EASTERN …SNAP (SPOKANE NEIGHBORHOOD ACTION PROGRAM) — $150,000 · OtherSNAP (SPOKANE NEIGHBORHOOD ACTION…SECOND HARVEST INLAND NORTHWEST — $150,000 · OtherSECOND HARVEST INLAND NORTHWESTPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF GREATER WASHINGTON AND NORTH IDAHO — $150,000 · OtherPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF GREATER WAS…VANESSA BEHAN — $120,000 · OtherVANESSA BEHAN+1 more — $10,000 · OtherSAN FRANCISCO BALLET ASSOCIATION — $250,000 · Arts & CultureSAN FRANCISCO B…Spokane Symphony Society — $60,000 · Arts & CultureSpokane Symphon…CORPORATION OF THE FINE ARTS MUSEUMS — $50,000 · Arts & CultureCORPORATION OF …SAN FRANCISCO MUSEUM OF MODERN ART — $40,000 · Arts & CultureSAN FRANCISCO M…CALIFORNIA COLLEGE OF THE ARTS — $237,500 · EducationCALIFORNIA…EASTSIDE COLLEGE PREPARATORY SCHOOL INC — $31,000 · EducationEASTSIDE C…YOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION — $120,000 · Human ServicesEpiscopal Community Services — $50,000 · Human ServicesAT THE CROSSROADS — $10,000 · Human ServicesTHE MARINE MAMMAL CENTER — $150,000 · Animals
Environment$540,000Philanthropy$518,100Other$880,000Arts & Culture$400,000Education$268,500Human Services$180,000Animals$150,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION — $328,100 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO BALLET ASSOCIATION — $250,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetINLAND NORTHWEST LAND TRUST — $240,000 over 6y, 4.1% of budgetCALIFORNIA COLLEGE OF THE ARTS — $237,500 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetInnovia Foundation — $190,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetWESTERN RIVERS CONSERVANCY — $150,000 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetCONSERVATION NW — $150,000 over 6y, 1.1% of budgetTHE MARINE MAMMAL CENTER — $150,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetThe Pacific Forest Trust Incorporated — $150,000 over 6y, 0.9% of budgetSECOND HARVEST INLAND NORTHWEST — $150,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF GREATER WASHINGTON AND NORTH IDAHO — $150,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetYOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION — $120,000 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetVANESSA BEHAN — $120,000 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetSpokane Symphony Society — $60,000 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetEpiscopal Community Services — $50,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCORPORATION OF THE FINE ARTS MUSEUMS — $50,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO MUSEUM OF MODERN ART — $40,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEASTSIDE COLLEGE PREPARATORY SCHOOL INC — $31,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetONE PURPOSE SCHOOL INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetAT THE CROSSROADS — $10,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION
  • Who funds SAN FRANCISCO BALLET ASSOCIATION
  • Who funds INLAND NORTHWEST LAND TRUST
  • Who funds CALIFORNIA COLLEGE OF THE ARTS
  • Who funds Innovia Foundation
  • Who funds WESTERN RIVERS CONSERVANCY
  • Who funds CONSERVATION NW
  • Who funds THE MARINE MAMMAL CENTER
  • Who funds The Pacific Forest Trust Incorporated
  • Who funds SECOND HARVEST INLAND NORTHWEST
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF GREATER WASHINGTON AND NORTH IDAHO
  • Who funds YOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION
  • Who funds VANESSA BEHAN
  • Who funds Spokane Symphony Society
  • Who funds Episcopal Community Services
  • Who funds CORPORATION OF THE FINE ARTS MUSEUMS
  • Who funds SAN FRANCISCO MUSEUM OF MODERN ART
  • Who funds EASTSIDE COLLEGE PREPARATORY SCHOOL INC
  • Who funds ONE PURPOSE SCHOOL INC
  • Who funds AT THE CROSSROADS

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Seattle FoundationWA16.7× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Seattle Foundation · Johnston-Fix Foundation · The Avista Foundation · Innovia Foundation · The Is & Emily Fetterman Foundation · Spokane Teachers Credit Union · Women Helping Women Fund · Bnsf Railway Foundation · First Interstate BancSystem Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The US Charitable Gift Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The George F Jewett Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 0%
  • Western Rivers Conservancy0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The George F Jewett Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The George F Jewett Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph