Loading…
Loading…
Louisiana · Nonprofit
SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK GREATER NEW (Louisiana) is funded by 159 grantmakers whose IRS filings report $73,442,153 in grants to it, the largest being The Chicago Community Trust ($25,050,000). 80 of them have funded it in more than one year.
Against its field
SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK GREATER NEW's funding has concentrated — grant income rose while the number of funders held roughly flat.
this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 253 food & nutrition nonprofits $10M–$100M, FY2023
Revenue, expenses and net assets — each indexed to 100 at its first filing year, so you read the trajectory, not the magnitude. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.
The funding model — what share of revenue comes from contributions, programs, investments and other sources — and whether it's shifting.
100% of SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK GREATER NEW’s revenue is contributions — more reliant on donations than three-quarters of its peers (96% for the typical peer).
Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 2 of the last 6 reported years ran a deficit.
Grant income rose $209k → $9.9M on a roughly flat funder count — a concentrated base.
53 of 159 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 48% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.
From the IRS filings of SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK GREATER NEW’s funders (the co-funder graph). Top 30 of 159 funders by total. Association, not causation.
SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK GREATER NEW leans on a few funders — its largest provides 34% of grant income and the top three 73%; half comes from just 2 funders.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 2 funders to its left
Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 67% · 2018 37% · 2019 33% · 2020 46% · 2021 74% · 2022 42% · 2023 49% · 2024 77% · 2025 72% — growing more concentrated.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration.
29% of SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK GREATER NEW's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 50% give in more than one year at all.
Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year.
SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK GREATER NEW draws 69% of its grant income from funders outside Louisiana — its reputation reaches beyond the state, across 33 states in all.
In-state vs out-of-state, by year
Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first. Your 159 funders put you under-funded among the 400 organizations that share them.
From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.
Grants and contracts to this organization from federal (USASpending) and state checkbooks, reconciled to its EIN. $374k on record.
Federal grants vs contracts are distinguished; state line items keep their reported category. Matched by name + geography (the BMF), so coverage is partial and precision-first.
Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
93% of spending goes to programs.
86%
Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.
Operates in 1 state
Part of a family of 1 related entity
Every figure is read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML — this organization’s own return for FY2023 (financials across 2018–2023), and the filings of 159funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. view filing