Loading…
· Public charity
HATCH INC
Hatch for hunger connects animal protein companies with food banks and pantries to provide quality protein to nutrition insecure neighbors.
$3.0M
Granted FY2024
—
Grants
—
Communities
—
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2024
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
Grant detail is referenced in an attached schedule not included in the e-file. Total reported in the filing: $2,958,100.
$0
Median grant
—
States reached
$1.6M
Total assets
02The need
02
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
03Your field
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
1
Food Bank for the Heartland
To eliminate hunger in the heartland by ensuring consistent access to healthy foods through community partnerships.
—
2
Food for People Inc
Food for people is a designated food bank committed to providing food for those in need.
Food & Nutrition
3
Food Bank of Northwest
To provide food to various charitable organizations and needy individuals in northwest indiana.
Food & Nutrition
4
The Food Bank of Northeast Arkansas
The food bank of northeast arkansas provides hunger relief to people in need by raising awareness, securing resources, and distributing food through a network of non-profit agencies and programs.
Human Services
5
The Food Bank for Central
Hunger relief network sharing millions of pounds of nutritious food with thousands of missourians.
Food & Nutrition
6
Second Harvest Foodbank of North Central
To grow hope in our region by creating pathways to nutritious food.
Food & Nutrition
7
Feeding Indiana's Hungry Inc
By drawing on varied resources within public agencies and the private sector, we hope to provide relief for those in need throughout Indiana.
Human Services
8
Ozarks Food Harvest Inc
Ozarks food harvest warehouses and distributes food products to 352 active member agencies in 28 counties.
Food & Nutrition
9
Mid-South Food Bank
Collection & distribution of food to charitable organizations serving those in need.
Food & Nutrition
10
Arkansas Foodbank
The arkansas foodbank acquires, through local and national partnerships, large quantities of food and other resources to distribute to hungry people in the state of arkansas. the arkansas foodbank supports programs for children as well as…
Food & Nutrition
11
Terre Haute Catholic Charities Foodbank Inc
The mission of the Terre Haute Catholic Charities Foodbank is to feed the hungry in Clay, Greene, Knox, Parke, Sullivan, Vermillion and Vigo counties through a network of emergency food distribution member agencies and engage our community…
Food & Nutrition
12
Christian Food Bank of Hopkins County
Provide food for the needy
Food & Nutrition
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hoosier Hills Food Bank Inc and the most unlike its peers is Community Health Network Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 44 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
Closures · last 5 years
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.
orgs you fund
0.0%0/49
the rest of the field
11%
206,164/1,819,516
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Central Indiana Community Foundation IncIN24.8× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →
Open a dossier: Central Indiana Community Foundation Inc · Duke Energy Foundation · Feeding America · The Kroger Co Zero Hunger Zero · Lilly Endowment Inc · Million Meal Movement Inc · Second Helpings Inc · United Way of Central Indiana Inc · The Indianapolis Foundation Inc · Land O'Lakes Foundation · Indy Hunger Network Inc · Hoosiers Feeding the Hungry Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
04Through Plinth
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro
How do I get to Hatch Inc?
Find your warmest path to Hatch Inc through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.
Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.
More from the funding graph
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars pass through an intermediary
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
Strange bedfellows
the named clusters of US funding
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines