Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Public charity

Desert Healthcare Foundation

To improve access to health and wellness services for the residents of the desert healthcare district

$1.0M
Granted FY2025still arriving
14
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$234k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.

Human Services$3.5MHealth$3.3MHousing & Shelter$2.3MEducation$1.1MCrime & Legal$609kCommunity Improvement$401kYouth Development$374kEmployment$150kOther$0
02FY2025 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 14 grants below total $660,121 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $1,012,492 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $352,371 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $16k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $289k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $355k
$44,433
Median grant
2
States reached
$6.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DAP HEALTH INC$234,281
HARC$66,240
RIVERSIDE CNTY LATINO COMM$54,553
YOUTH LEADERSHIP INSTITUTE$45,000
VISION Y COMPROMISO$45,000
ASTHMA & ALLERGY FNDTN OF AM$44,972
DESERT RECREATION FOUNDATION$44,433
DSUSD EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION$29,622
DESERT REGIONAL MED CTR AUX$29,000
REGENTS OF UC RIVERSIDE$26,520
CLINICAS DE SALUD DEL PUEBLO$14,224
WORD OF LIFE FELLOWSHIP CTR$10,000
MARTHAS VILLAGE& KITCHEN$9,986
TRANSGENDER HLTH & WELLNESS$6,290
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $2.9M) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%El Sol Neighborhood Edu Ctr: $260k → 14%EL SOL NEIGHBORHOOD EDUC CTR: $202k → 14%REGIONAL ACCESS PROJECT FNDT: $537k → 11%EL SOL NEIGHBORHOOD EDUC CTR: $183k → 14%REGIONAL ACCESS PROJECT FOUNDATION: $300k → 11%EL SOL NEIGHBORHOOD EDUCATIONAL CEN: $40k → 14%Regional Access Project Fnd: $150k → 11%Galilee Center: $153k → 11%GALILEE CENTER: $90k → 11%GALILEE CENTER: $63k → 11%Galilee Center: $59k → 11%GALILEE CENTER: $37k → 11%Angel View Inc: $28k → 11%Angel View Inc: $23k → 11%TODEC LEGAL CENTER PERRIS: $300k → 11%Todec Legal Center Perris: $170k → 11%TODEC LEGAL CENTER PERRIS: $91k → 11%TODEC LEGAL CENTER PERRIS: $49k → 11%Marthas Village & Kitchen: $65k → 11%Coachella Valley Rescue Miss: $51k → 11%MARTHAS VILLAGE& KITCHEN: $45k → 11%MARTHAS VILLAGE KITCHEN: $45k → 11%MARTHAS VILLAGE& KITCHEN: $10k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$10M · 27 repeat orgs$1.5M to everyone else

27 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2025, 17 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

27
7

Total granted

$10M
$1.4M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+44%
+58%

Still filing today

85%
43%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 75% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $166k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesEducationHousing & ShelterEmploymentYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • VY
    VISION Y COMPROMISO
    3× · 2021–2025 · $716k · revenue +98%
  • EL SOL NEIGHBORHOOD EDUCATIONAL CENTER
    4× · 2021–2024 · $685k · revenue +164%
  • Todec Legal Center Perris
    4× · 2021–2024 · $609k · revenue +44%

Funded once

  • MC
    MISCELLANEOUS CHARITIES
    one grant, 2023 · $1.2M
  • AF
    ALLIANCE FOR A HEALTHIER GENERATION INC
    one grant, 2017 · $75k · revenue -49%
  • CV
    COACHELLA VALLEY RESCUE MISSIONgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $51k · revenue +58%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Clinica Msr Oscar a Romero

See schedule oour mission is to provide quality, affordable, community-sensitive health care and other services to the underserved communities of greater los angeles, regardless of their ability to pay, by upholding the legacy and…

Health
2
Central Valley Gender Health & Wellness
Civil Rights
3
Riverside Community Health Foundation

To improve the health and well being of the community by providing health education and outreach programs as well as grants to non-profit organizations, schools, and government agencies.

Health
4
The Children's Clinic 'Serving Children and Their Families'

TCC Family Health mission is to provide innovative, integrated, quality health care that will contribute to a healthy community, focusing on those in need and working with patients and the community as partners in their overall well-being.

—
5
Vista Community Health Center
—
6
California Health Collaborative

Improving health and wellness of individuals with limited access to health-care resources and who most often confront barriers related to culture, language, immigration status, income, gender, geography, and/or education.

Health
7
Community Impact Central Valley

To deliver comprehensive health and human service programs that improve the health and well-being of under-served california residents.

Health
8
California Health M R C
Community Improvement
9
Consejo Counseling & Referral Service

Consejo brings healing, health, and hope to communities through holistic, culturally, and linguistically competent behavioral health services and advocacy.

Health
10
Laguna Beach Community Clinic

The mission of laguna beach community clinic (lbcc) is to provide excellent medical care regardless of the patient's ability to pay.

Health
11
Public Health Foundation Enterprises Inc

To enhance the health, wellness, and resilience of every community we serve - see schedule o for more details

—
12
Canyonlands Community Health Center

The mission of canyonlands healthcare is to promote healthier lives through affordable, accessible, integrated primary care.

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Alianza Coachella Valley and the most unlike its peers is Alliance for a Healthier Generation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 31 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number27%4%<5yr16%11%5–10yr20%21%10–20yr17%29%20–35yr10%14%35–55yr11%21%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value27%1%<5yr16%8%5–10yr20%11%10–20yr17%58%20–35yr10%7%35–55yr11%16%55yr+

The field is 27% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/37
the rest of the field
15%
2,787/18,236

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

30 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 30 of the 38 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
29/30
Grantees still filing
22/30
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Coachella Valley Assoc of Gov — $1,624,000 · OtherCoachella Valley Assoc of GovMISCELLANEOUS CHARITIES — $1,178,165 · OtherMISCELLANEOUS CHARITIESBORREGO COMMUNITY HEALTH FOUNDATION — $710,331 · OtherBORREGO COMMUNITY HEALTH FOUNDATIONCity of Palm Springs — $629,584 · OtherCity of Palm SpringsREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT RIVERSIDE — $476,520 · OtherREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT RIVERSID…ALIANZA COACHELLA VALLEY — $319,832 · OtherALIANZA COACHELLA VALLEYYouth Leadership Institute — $299,719 · OtherYouth Leadership Institute+6 more — $132,194 · OtherREGIONAL ACCESS PROJECT FOUNDATION — $987,450 · Human ServicesREGIONAL ACCESS PROJECT FOUN…EL SOL NEIGHBORHOOD EDUCATIONAL CENTER — $685,102 · Human ServicesEL SOL NEIGHBORHOOD EDUCATIO…Todec Legal Center Perris — $609,428 · Human ServicesTodec Legal Center PerrisGALILEE CENTER INC — $401,970 · Human ServicesGALILEE CENTER INCMARTHA'S VILLAGE AND KITCHEN INC — $164,954 · Human ServicesMARTHA'S VILLAGE AND KITCHEN…+2 more — $101,000 · Human ServicesRiverside County Latino Commission on Alcohol and Drug Abuse Services Inc — $599,503 · HealthRiverside County …DAP Health Inc — $370,258 · HealthDAP Health IncPublic Health Institute — $212,460 · HealthPublic Health Ins…DESERT REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER AUXILIARY — $201,000 · HealthDESERT REGIONAL M…CLINICAS DE SALUD DEL PUEBLO INC — $149,224 · HealthCLINICAS DE SALUD…TRANSGENDER HEALTH AND WELLNESS CENTER — $123,082 · HealthTRANSGENDER HEALT…HARC INC — $66,240 · Health+3 more — $112,972 · Health+3 moreVISION Y COMPROMISO — $715,625 · EducationVISION Y C…DESERT SANDS UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION — $296,194 · EducationDESERT SAN…ONEFUTURE COACHELLA VALLEY — $110,000 · EducationONEFUTURE …PUEBLO UNIDO CDC — $195,000 · Housing & ShelterRIVERSIDE COMMUNITY HOUSING CORP — $15,844 · Housing & ShelterOrganizacion en California de Lideres Campesinas Inc — $150,000 · EmploymentALLIANCE FOR A HEALTHIER GENERATION INC — $74,757 · Youth DevelopmentDESERT RECREATION FOUNDATION — $44,433 · Community Improvement
Other$5,370,345Human Services$2,949,904Health$1,834,739Education$1,121,819Housing & Shelter$210,844Employment$150,000Youth Development$74,757Community Improvement$44,433

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetREGIONAL ACCESS PROJECT FOUNDATION — $987,450 over 3y, 20% of budgetVISION Y COMPROMISO — $715,625 over 3y, 3.1% of budgetBORREGO COMMUNITY HEALTH FOUNDATION — $710,331 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetEL SOL NEIGHBORHOOD EDUCATIONAL CENTER — $685,102 over 4y, 4.3% of budgetTodec Legal Center Perris — $609,428 over 4y, 3.3% of budgetRiverside County Latino Commission on Alcohol and Drug Abuse Services Inc — $599,503 over 3y, 2.6% of budgetGALILEE CENTER INC — $401,970 over 5y, 2.1% of budgetDAP Health Inc — $370,258 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetALIANZA COACHELLA VALLEY — $319,832 over 4y, 3.6% of budgetYouth Leadership Institute — $299,719 over 5y, 2.3% of budgetPublic Health Institute — $212,460 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetDESERT REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER AUXILIARY — $201,000 over 9y, 20% of budgetPUEBLO UNIDO CDC — $195,000 over 2y, 11% of budgetMARTHA'S VILLAGE AND KITCHEN INC — $164,954 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetOrganizacion en California de Lideres Campesinas Inc — $150,000 over 2y, 3.5% of budgetCLINICAS DE SALUD DEL PUEBLO INC — $149,224 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTRANSGENDER HEALTH AND WELLNESS CENTER — $123,082 over 3y, 1.9% of budgetONEFUTURE COACHELLA VALLEY — $110,000 over 2y, 3.0% of budgetALLIANCE FOR A HEALTHIER GENERATION INC — $74,757 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetHARC INC — $66,240 over 1y, 5.5% of budgetCOACHELLA VALLEY RESCUE MISSION — $51,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetAngel View Inc — $50,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCoachella Valley Volunteers in Medicine — $50,000 over 2y, 3.0% of budgetJOHN F KENNEDY MEMORIAL FOUNDATION — $45,000 over 2y, 2.3% of budgetDESERT RECREATION FOUNDATION — $44,433 over 1y, 12% of budgetEisenhower Medical Center — $18,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetABC RECOVERY CENTER — $14,194 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Regional Access Proje…Inland Empire Communi…Bighorn Golf Club Cha…Kaiser Foundation Hos…The California Endowm…Weingart FoundationAnderson Childrens Fo…Impact Through Golf F…The Grace Helen Spear…The James Irvine Foun…Houston Family Founda…The Champions Volunte…
Regional Access Project FoundationCA42.9× affinity18 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Regional Access Project Foundation · Inland Empire Community Foundation · Bighorn Golf Club Charities Inc · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · The California Endowment · Weingart Foundation · Anderson Childrens Foundation · Impact Through Golf Foundation · The Grace Helen Spearman Foundation · The James Irvine Foundation · Houston Family Foundation · The Champions Volunteer Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Desert Healthcare Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    17report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Desert Healthcare Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Desert Healthcare Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 38 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home
    State money flows
    the interactive map of money crossing state lines