· Public charity
Eisenhower Medical Center
Eisenhower Medical Center, a not for-profit organization, exists to serve the changing healthcare needs by providing excellence in patient care with supportive education and research.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2018–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 40 grants below total $1,646,901 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $1,775,030 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $128,129 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k6 grants · $47k
- $10k–50k25 grants · $424k
- $50k–250k7 grants · $486k
- $250k+2 grants · $690k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| IEHP Foundation | $400,000 |
| College of the Desert Foundation | $289,600 |
| LGBTQ Community Center of the Desert | $115,000 |
| Palm Springs International Film Society | $75,000 |
| DAP Health | $71,000 |
| Desert Champions LLC | $70,000 |
| AIDS ASSISTANCE PROGRAM | $55,181 |
| Coachella Valley Volunteers in Medicine | $50,000 |
| Total Sports Consulting LLC | $50,000 |
| Bighorn Golf Club Charities | $39,000 |
| Rancho Mirage Writers Festival | $35,000 |
| Coachella Valley Repertory | $30,000 |
| Palm Springs Chamber of Commerce | $27,500 |
| Martha's Village and Kitchen Inc | $25,000 |
| MCCALLUM THEATRE | $20,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–25, $160k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +18% since the first grant, against +17% for the ones you funded once.
39 repeat relationships — 33 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 70% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $488k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CVCoachella Valley Volunteers in Medicine7× · 2018–2025 · $416k · revenue +86%
- TLTHE LGBTQ COMMUNITY CENTER OF THE D5× · 2019–2025 · $415k · revenue +146%
- DHDAP Health Inc8× · 2018–2025 · $399k · revenue +543%
Funded once
- TFTHE FOUNDATION OF PALM SPRINGS UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICTone grant, 2023 · $50k · revenue -50%
- IWImg Worldwide LLCone grant, 2022 · $25k
- LILOW INCOME INVESTMENT FUNDgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $15k · revenue +102%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Palm springs art museum creates transformative experiences that expand our understanding of ourselves and the world. palm springs art museum has a wide-reaching and growing permanent collection of over 12,000 objects rooted in modern and…
The coachella valley chapter of the community associations institute ("cai - cv") serves the educational, business and networking needs of community associations in the coachella valley region of southern california.
The primary mission of the organization is to promote business within the menifee valley area.
The mission of the coachella valley journalism foundation is to promote and support excellent, sustainable community journalism in the coachella valley.
The Chamber is the voice for businesses in Escondido providing leadership and guidance for the local small business community.
The Mission of the Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce is to partner with the business community by Connecting People, Solving Business Challenges, and Supporting Business-Friendly Initiatives.
To educate and promote public awareness of the importance of preserving the historical resources and architecture of the city of palm springs and the coachella valley area.
To improve the health care system where all Californians can access appropriate, affordable, quality health care through education and collaboration with all branches of government and key stakeholders to re-design a system of care
We foster reverence for life, relief of suffering, and compassion in loss for the terminally ill residents and their families in the communities we serve.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Palm Springs Chamber of Commerce and the most unlike its peers is Med Access International. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 31 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 26% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 11% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 16% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
54 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 54 of the 60 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Coachella Valley Volunteers in Medicine ↗
- Who funds THE LGBTQ COMMUNITY CENTER OF THE D ↗
- Who funds IEHP Foundation ↗
- Who funds DAP Health Inc ↗
- Who funds College of the Desert Foundation ↗
- Who funds AIDS Assistance Program ↗
- Who funds HARC INC ↗
- Who funds BIGHORN GOLF CLUB CHARITIES INC ↗
- Who funds PALM SPRINGS INTERNATIONAL FILM SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds MIZELL CENTER ↗
- Who funds MED ACCESS INTERNATIONAL ↗
- Who funds DESERT CANCER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
- Who funds RANCHO MIRAGE WRITERS FESTIVAL ↗
- Who funds LIFESTREAM INC ↗
- Who funds Palm Springs Chamber of Commerce ↗
- Who funds GREATER PALM SPRINGS PRIDE INC ↗
- Who funds THE FOUNDATION OF PALM SPRINGS UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT ↗
- Who funds MARTHA'S VILLAGE AND KITCHEN INC ↗
- Who funds THE L-FUND ↗
- Who funds Animal Samaritans ↗
- Who funds HAZELDEN BETTY FORD FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds Friends of the Cultural Center Inc ↗
- Who funds COACHELLA VALLEY SYMPHONY ↗
- Who funds EQUALITY CALIFORNIA ↗
- Who funds COACHELLA VALLEY REPERTORY ↗
- Who funds SONGSHINE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE ARC OF THE UNITED STATES ↗
- Who funds SHAYS WARRIORS ↗
- Who funds DESERT ARC ↗
- Who funds ASSOCIATION OF CALIFORNIA NURSE LEADERS ↗
- Who funds Rancho Mirage Chamber of Commerce ↗
- Who funds PALM SPRINGS MODERN COMMITTEE ↗
- Who funds CARAVANSERAI PROJECT ↗
- Who funds Palm Springs International Piano Competition ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Inland Empire Community Foundation · The Grace Helen Spearman Foundation · HN and Frances C Berger Foundation · Bighorn Golf Club Charities Inc · Regional Access Project Foundation · The Auen Foundation · The Coeta and Donald Barker Foundation · Houston Family Foundation · Desert Community Foundation · Impact Through Golf Foundation · Anderson Childrens Foundation · The Galen Family Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Eisenhower Medical Center funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Lifestream Inc — 92% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.