Skip to content

California · Private foundation

Roth-Armstrong-Hayes Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$176k
Granted FY2024(still arriving)
18
Grants FY2024
18
Organizations funded FY2023
0%
First-time grantees FY2023
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2024
$10,000
Largest grant, FY2024
$20,000
Organizations funded a year
18 to 21
FY2017 to FY2023
States reached, FY2024
6
Total assets, FY2024
$2.8M
Applications
Preselected organizations only
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2023, 0% of the organizations Roth-Armstrong-Hayes Foundation funded were first-time grantees, receiving 0% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23
AnimalsHuman ServicesHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2024still arriving18$176k0%
FY202318$176k0%
FY202221$204k0%
FY202121$181k0%
FY202021$176k0%
FY201921$176k19%
FY201820$160k10%
FY201719$140kn/a
99% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Animals$280kHuman Services$253kFood & Nutrition$155kInternational$126kReligion$120kHealth$100kEmployment$100kRecreation & Sports$60kOther$0

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2024, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Catholic Charities San Bernardino & Riverside Counties$160,00080%
Redwood Gospel Missions$120,00080%
Canine Companions for Independence Inc$115,00080%
Redwood Empire Food Bank$110,00080%
Mikeroweworks Foundation$87,50081%
Crittenton Centers$77,50080%
United States Fund for Unicef$75,00080%
SNAP Cats$65,00074%
Peoria Park District Foundation$60,0007n/a
Paws for Purple Hearts$57,50080%
Show all 20 grantees

What it could do for these grantees

Plus 5 recipients with no EIN on record ($196k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget Roth-Armstrong-Hayes Foundation supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCatholic Charities San Bernardino & Riverside Counties: $160,000 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetRedwood Gospel Missions: $120,000 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetCanine Companions for Independence Inc: $115,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetRedwood Empire Food Bank: $110,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetMikeroweworks Foundation: $87,500 over 8y, 0.6% of budgetCrittenton Centers: $77,500 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetUnited States Fund for Unicef: $75,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetSNAP Cats: $65,000 over 7y, 4.1% of budgetPaws for Purple Hearts: $57,500 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetMedecins Sans Frontieres USA Inc: $50,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetMidwest Food Bank Nfp: $45,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetThe First Response Team of America Corp: $40,000 over 8y, 1.4% of budgetCompassion Without Borders: $30,000 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetLewy Body Dementia Association Inc: $30,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetHumane Society of Sonoma County: $30,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetGoodwill Industries of the Redwood Empire: $12,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPetaluma Animal Services Foundation: $10,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetThe Society of St Vincent de Paul District Council of Sonoma County Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 18.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

McNabb FoundationDE15.4× affinity5 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: McNabb Foundation · Sonoma County Community Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Network for Good · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Roth-Armstrong-Hayes Foundation with peer funders

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Roth-Armstrong-Hayes Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Roth-Armstrong-Hayes Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

About Roth-Armstrong-Hayes Foundation

How much does Roth-Armstrong-Hayes Foundation give?
Roth-Armstrong-Hayes Foundation reported 18 grants totaling $175,500 in its FY2024 IRS filing. It funded between 18 and 21 organizations a year over FY2017 to FY2023.
What does Roth-Armstrong-Hayes Foundation fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2024, its largest causes are Animals (18%), Human Services (16%), Food & Nutrition (10%).
Who are Roth-Armstrong-Hayes Foundation's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2024: Catholic Charities San Bernardino & Riverside Counties ($160k), Redwood Gospel Missions ($120k), Canine Companions for Independence Inc ($115k).
Does Roth-Armstrong-Hayes Foundation fund new organizations?
In FY2023, 0% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does Roth-Armstrong-Hayes Foundation accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and does not take unsolicited requests. Check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
Which funders back the same organizations as Roth-Armstrong-Hayes Foundation?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include McNabb Foundation, Sonoma County Community Foundation, American Endowment Foundation.
Where is Roth-Armstrong-Hayes Foundation based?
Roth-Armstrong-Hayes Foundation is based in CA.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 26 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports $205k of grant expense with no grantee named in the published copy. A private foundation itemizes every grant it makes, so a return carrying none has filed its list as an attachment that the public copy does not include. The figures above are therefore from FY2024, the most recent year this funder’s grantee list reached the public record.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Roth-Armstrong-Hayes’ filings →

More from the funding graph