Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

Lowell Berry Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.8M
Granted FY2025still arriving
142
Grants FY2025still arriving
14
States reached
$188k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
0199% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.

Religion$4.5MYouth Development$2.9MEducation$2.5MHousing & Shelter$960kCommunity Improvement$812kHuman Services$670kArts & Culture$477kRecreation & Sports$414kOther$0
02FY2025 · 142 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k109 grants · $471k
  • $10k–50k25 grants · $540k
  • $50k–250k8 grants · $822k
$5,000
Median grant
14
States reached
$38M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
The Bay Area Urban Network$188,000
Fuller Theological Seminary$168,000
School of Urban Missions$129,000
City Team Ministries$81,500
WellSpring$80,000
The Leadership Connection$63,000
Hawaiian Islands Ministries$60,000
Young Life - Diablo Valley$52,000
Intervarsity Christian Fellowship$48,000
Harbor House Ministries Inc$47,000
Joni & Friends - SF Bay Area$47,000
Faith Network of the East Bay Inc$42,000
Diocese of Oakland$42,000
Todays Youth Matter$41,000
Bay Area REscue Mission$35,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $2.4M) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 79% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%My New Red Shoes: $8k → 7%Scopa Has a Dream Inc: $12k → 9%My New Red Shoes: $7k → 7%Grateful Gatherings: $8k → 12%Grateful Gatherings: $8k → 12%Grateful Gatherings: $8k → 12%Grateful Gatherings: $7k → 12%Open Possibilities: $8k → 8%Covenant House CA: $6k → 10%Covenant House CA: $6k → 10%Loved-A-Child Missions: $8k → 9%Trinity Center Walnut Creek: $15k → 9%Trinity Center Walnut Creek: $8k → 9%Trinity Center Walnut Creek: $7k → 9%Trinity Center Walnut Creek: $7k → 9%Monument Crisis Ctr: $21k → 9%Monument Crisis Ctr: $11k → 9%Monument Crisis Ctr: $10k → 9%Safe Refuge for Children and Families: $7k → 9%White Pony Express: $14k → 9%White Pony Express: $10k → 9%White Pony Express: $7k → 9%Teen Esteem: $16k → 9%Teen Esteem: $15k → 9%Teen Esteem: $15k → 9%Teen Esteem: $15k → 9%Teen Esteem: $15k → 9%Teen Esteem: $15k → 9%Teen Esteem: $15k → 9%Teen Esteem: $13k → 9%Teen Esteem: $11k → 9%Berkeley Food & Housing Project: $9k → 10%Camps in Common: $11k → 10%The Bay Area Urban Network: $188k → 10%Camps in Common: $10k → 10%The Bay Area Urban Network: $188k → 10%Camps in Common: $9k → 10%The Bay Area Urban Network: $184k → 10%Camps in Common: $8k → 10%The Bay Area Urban Network: $178k → 10%Loved Twice: $7k → 10%The Bay Area Urban Network: $175k → 10%Loved Twice: $7k → 10%The Bay Area Urban Network: $174k → 10%Loved Twice: $7k → 10%The Bay Area Urban Network: $167k → 10%The Bay Area Urban Network: $151k → 10%The Bay Area Urban Network: $147k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

VT
ID
MT
IL
MI
NY
MA
NV
OH
PA
CT
CA
CO
MO
VA
MD
AZ
AR
TN
NC
DC
HI
OK
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$14M · 233 repeat orgs$609k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +39% since the first grant, against +19% for the ones you funded once.

233 repeat relationships — 119 still active in FY2025, 114 since wound down; 21 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

233
99

Total granted

$14M
$527k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+39%
+19%

Still filing today

66%
52%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $82k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationHealthReligionYouth DevelopmentRecreation & SportsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TB
    THE BAY AREA URBAN NETWORK INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $1.6M · revenue +55% · 38% of their budget
  • CM
    CITYTEAM MINISTRIES
    9× · 2017–2025 · $668k · revenue +50%
  • W
    WELLSPRING
    9× · 2017–2025 · $527k · revenue +214%

Funded once

  • YL
    Young Life of Berkeley
    one grant, 2017 · $73k
  • BC
    Bayside Church of Placerville
    one grant, 2021 · $50k
  • CF
    CHICO FOURSQUARE CHURCH
    one grant, 2018 · $50k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
East Bay Agency for Children

For more than 70 years, East Bay Agency for Children continues to improve the well-being of children, youth and families by reducing the impact of trauma and social inequalities.

Health
2
San Francisco Casa

San Francisco CASA transforms the lives of children and youth traumatized and displaced in the foster care and related systems by providing one consistent, caring volunteer advocate, trained to address each childs needs in the court and…

Civil Rights
3
Enterprise for Youth

Enterprise for youth empowers under-resourced san francisco youths to reach their potential through transformative paid internship experiences supported by a community of employers, caring adults, and peers.

Youth Development
4
California School-Age Consortium Inc

The California School-Age Consortium (CalSAC) builds professional networks that provide training, leadership development and advocacy to ensure that all young people have access to high quality out-of-school time programs and to create a…

—
5
Jobs with Justice San Francisco

A long-term, strategic alliance of labor, community, faith-based, and student organizations working together to build greater economic power for workers and community members through employee rights at work and access to good jobs,…

Employment
6
Oakland Kids First

The mission of Oakland Kids First is to increase youth voice, leadership and power to create engaging and equitable public schools where all students learn and lead.

Youth Development
7
Big Brothers Big Sisters of the Bay Area

To create and support one-to-one mentoring relationships that ignite the power and promise of youth.

—
8
Children's Council of San Francisco

By advocating for quality early care and education, empowering families with information and financial support, and building the capabilities of educators, Children's Council of San Francisco ensures that every child in San Francisco has…

Human Services
9
Side By Side

To support children, youth, and their families in healing from past trauma, developing social, emotional, and functional life skills to cope and build resilience, and accessing necessary resources now and in the future. The Agency does so…

Health
10
Unitedly

Unitedly is a nonprofit organization based in San Mateo County, California. Unitedly was established to ensure Asian families and communities have access to equitable opportunities and resources to thrive in the San Francisco Bay Area.

Human Services
11
Friends of the Children - San Francisco Bay Area

Impacting generational change by empowering youth who are facing the greatest obstacles through relationships with professional mentors - 12+ years, no matter what.

Education
12
Go Public Schools

GO Public Schools builds and supports a multi-city network of local coalitions, whose members parents, educators, and community allies work together to expand access to quality education in Californias most historically underserved…

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Teen Challenge of East Bay Inc and the most unlike its peers is Vine Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyAnimal Rescue and AdoptionAffordable Housing Developm…Youth Soccer LeaguesInternational Child Educati…Healthcare Industry Associa…Public Sector Labor UnionsYouth Arts Education Progra…Regional Business ChambersSchool Parent-Teacher Organ…Family Philanthropic Founda…Christian Evangelical Churc…California Land & Wildlife …Charter and Alternative Sch…Food & Shelter Services
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 30 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number24%3%<5yr15%6%5–10yr19%18%10–20yr17%34%20–35yr12%21%35–55yr12%18%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value24%1%<5yr15%2%5–10yr19%11%10–20yr17%62%20–35yr12%11%35–55yr12%14%55yr+

The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
2%5/262
the rest of the field
14%
13,846/99,861

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

237 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 237 of the 360 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
69
Early backer (in before they grew)
223/237
Grantees still filing
163/237
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

SCHOOL OF URBAN MISSIONS — $990,920 · OtherSCHOOL OF URBAN MISSIONSThe Leadership Connection — $402,000 · OtherThe Leadership ConnectionYoung Life - Diablo Valley — $402,000 · OtherYoung Life - Diablo ValleyIntervarsity Christian Fellowship — $371,000 · OtherIntervarsity Christian FellowshipJoni & Friends - SF Bay Area — $342,000 · OtherJoni & Friends - SF Bay AreaHabitat For Humanity — $243,270 · Other+110 more — $3,452,172 · Other+110 moreTHE BAY AREA URBAN NETWORK INC — $1,552,000 · Human ServicesTHE BAY AREA URBAN NE…BAY AREA RESCUE MISSION — $288,100 · Human ServicesBAY AREA RESCUE MISSI…Teen Esteem — $129,500 · Human Services+26 more — $708,020 · Human Services+26 moreCITYTEAM MINISTRIES — $668,100 · ReligionCITYTEAM MINISTRIE…WELLSPRING — $526,500 · ReligionWELLSPRINGHAWAIIAN ISLANDS MINISTRIES INC — $478,000 · ReligionHAWAIIAN ISLANDS M…CHILDREN RISING INC — $354,270 · ReligionCHILDREN RISING IN…Q PLACE — $82,500 · Religion+6 more — $159,200 · Religion+6 moreFULLER THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY — $1,412,000 · EducationFULLER THEOLOGICA…THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY — $116,666 · EducationTHE RENEWAL PROJECT INC DBA THE LEADERSHIP CONNECTION — $110,000 · EducationOAKLAND DIGITAL ARTS AND LITERACY CENTER INC — $76,667 · Education+18 more — $485,000 · Education+18 moreHarbor House Ministries Inc — $329,600 · Community ImprovementABLE WORKS — $31,000 · Community ImprovementASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF DIABLO VALLEY — $26,000 · Community ImprovementFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES — $52,000 · Youth DevelopmentTRIPS FOR KIDS MARIN — $35,000 · Youth DevelopmentCAMP PHOENIX — $34,000 · Youth DevelopmentALAMEDA BOYS & GIRLS CLUB INC — $33,000 · Youth DevelopmentSIERRA SERVICE PROJECT — $22,958 · Youth DevelopmentUpward Roots Inc — $21,000 · Youth DevelopmentCYCLES OF CHANGE — $15,000 · Youth DevelopmentMindful Littles — $8,500 · Youth DevelopmentHOMEBOY INDUSTRIES — $8,500 · Youth Development+2 more — $15,000 · Youth DevelopmentMERCY HOUSING CALIFORNIA — $52,000 · Housing & ShelterSHELTER INC — $43,000 · Housing & ShelterContra Costa Interfaith Transitional Housing Inc — $38,000 · Housing & ShelterOakland Elizabeth House — $30,000 · Housing & ShelterREDWOOD GOSPEL MISSIONS — $25,000 · Housing & ShelterOPERATION DIGNITY INC — $24,000 · Housing & ShelterCHANGE TO COME — $14,000 · Housing & ShelterRUBY'S PLACE INC — $8,000 · Housing & Shelter
Other$6,203,362Human Services$2,677,620Religion$2,268,570Education$2,200,333Community Improvement$386,600Youth Development$244,958Housing & Shelter$234,000

Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE BAY AREA URBAN NETWORK INC — $1,552,000 over 9y, 38% of budgetFULLER THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY — $1,412,000 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetSCHOOL OF URBAN MISSIONS — $990,920 over 9y, 4.3% of budgetCITYTEAM MINISTRIES — $668,100 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetWELLSPRING — $526,500 over 9y, 9.0% of budgetHAWAIIAN ISLANDS MINISTRIES INC — $478,000 over 9y, 5.8% of budgetCHILDREN RISING INC — $354,270 over 9y, 4.7% of budgetHarbor House Ministries Inc — $329,600 over 9y, 7.9% of budgetBAY AREA RESCUE MISSION — $288,100 over 9y, 0.8% of budgetTODAYS YOUTH MATTER — $153,500 over 8y, 7.1% of budgetTeen Esteem — $129,500 over 9y, 4.2% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY — $116,666 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetTHE RENEWAL PROJECT INC DBA THE LEADERSHIP CONNECTION — $110,000 over 2y, 33% of budgetQ PLACE — $82,500 over 9y, 3.7% of budgetLoaves and Fishes of Contra Costa — $78,500 over 9y, 0.7% of budgetOAKLAND DIGITAL ARTS AND LITERACY CENTER INC — $76,667 over 9y, 10.0% of budgetARIEL OUTREACH MISSION — $63,000 over 9y, 12% of budgetARM OF CARE INC — $61,500 over 9y, 7.5% of budgetMONUMENT CRISIS CENTER — $60,200 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetCamps in Common — $58,000 over 9y, 1.1% of budgetPROJECT PEACE EAST BAY — $55,500 over 7y, 11% of budgetUniversity of the Pacific — $55,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BREAD PROJECT — $55,000 over 8y, 1.5% of budgetSOAR For Youth — $55,000 over 9y, 1.1% of budgetTEEN CHALLENGE OF EAST BAY INC — $55,000 over 6y, 1.5% of budgetJOHN F KENNEDY UNIVERSITY — $54,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetALAMEDA COUNTY COMMUNITY FOOD BANK — $53,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMERCY HOUSING CALIFORNIA — $52,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES — $52,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSTRATUM — $51,000 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetTRINITY CENTER WALNUT CREEK — $50,320 over 7y, 1.2% of budgetFOOD BANK OF CONTRA COSTA AND SOLANO — $49,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetOKIZU FOUNDATION — $48,500 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetSAINT MARY'S COLLEGE OF CALIFORNIA — $48,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetGRATEFUL GATHERINGS — $47,000 over 8y, 1.3% of budgetREADING PARTNERS — $45,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetWHITE PONY EXPRESS — $44,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetWATERSIDE WORKSHOPS — $43,500 over 9y, 0.6% of budgetSHELTER INC — $43,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetTHE OAKLAND PUBLIC EDUCATION FUND — $42,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF OAKLAND — $41,180 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetInsight Housing FKA Berkeley Food and Housing Project — $41,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetPILLARS OF HOPE INCORPORATED — $41,000 over 9y, 48% of budgetFamily Support Services — $40,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetST MARY'S CENTER — $39,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetPROJECT AVARY INC ALTERNATIVE VENTURES FOR AT RISK YOUTH — $38,500 over 9y, 0.5% of budgetCommunity Resources for Science — $38,500 over 9y, 0.9% of budgetContra Costa Interfaith Transitional Housing Inc — $38,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE BAY AREA URBAN NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds FULLER THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY ↗
  • Who funds SCHOOL OF URBAN MISSIONS ↗
  • Who funds CITYTEAM MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds WELLSPRING ↗
  • Who funds HAWAIIAN ISLANDS MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN RISING INC ↗
  • Who funds Harbor House Ministries Inc ↗
  • Who funds BAY AREA RESCUE MISSION ↗
  • Who funds TODAYS YOUTH MATTER ↗
  • Who funds Teen Esteem ↗
  • Who funds THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds THE RENEWAL PROJECT INC DBA THE LEADERSHIP CONNECTION ↗
  • Who funds Q PLACE ↗
  • Who funds Loaves and Fishes of Contra Costa ↗
  • Who funds OAKLAND DIGITAL ARTS AND LITERACY CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds ARIEL OUTREACH MISSION ↗
  • Who funds ARM OF CARE INC ↗
  • Who funds MONUMENT CRISIS CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Camps in Common ↗
  • Who funds PROJECT PEACE EAST BAY ↗
  • Who funds University of the Pacific ↗
  • Who funds THE BREAD PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds SOAR For Youth ↗
  • Who funds TEEN CHALLENGE OF EAST BAY INC ↗
  • Who funds JOHN F KENNEDY UNIVERSITY ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

East Bay Community Fo…Bernard E & Alba Witk…Dean and Margaret Les…West Davis & Bergard …The Barrios TrustThe San Francisco Fou…Quest FoundationSan Jose Mercury News…Kaiser Foundation Hos…Sunlight GivingFremont Bank Foundati…United Way of the Bay…
East Bay Community FoundationCA82.8× affinity71 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: East Bay Community Foundation · Bernard E & Alba Witkin Charitable Foundation · Dean and Margaret Lesher Foundation · West Davis & Bergard Foundation · The Barrios Trust · The San Francisco Foundation · Quest Foundation · San Jose Mercury News Wish Book Fund Inc · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · Sunlight Giving · Fremont Bank Foundation · United Way of the Bay Area

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Lowell Berry Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
76report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Lowell Berry Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Lowell Berry Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 360 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines