Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Van Allen Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$15k
Granted FY2025still arriving
15
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$2k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Housing & Shelter$23kCommunity Improvement$23kHealth$23kReligion$18kFood & Nutrition$17kHuman Services$16kInternational$11kYouth Development$9kOther$0
02FY2025 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$1,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$199k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MARIN PREGNANCY CLINIC$2,000
SMARITANS PURSE$1,200
ROADRUNNER FOOD BANK$1,000
BAY AREA RESCUE MISSION$1,000
REDWOOD GOSPEL MISSION$1,000
NM RAMP PROJECT$1,000
DREAM SPRING$1,000
NM BOYS AND GIRLS RANCHES$1,000
SLEEP IN HEAVENLY PEACE$1,000
TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION$1,000
JOY JUNCTION$1,000
UNM CHILDRENS HOSPITAL$1,000
FAMILY PROMISE OF WAKE COUNTY$800
WITH LOVE FROM JESUS$800
FUQUAY EMERGENCY FOOD PANTRY$400
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 82% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $2k → 11%DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS: $1k → 17%ROADRUNNER FOOD BANK: $2k → 14%FEED THE CHILDREN: $1k → 16%HEIFER INTERNATIONAL: $1k → 17%SAVE THE CHILDREN: $1k → 9%WITH LOVE FROM JESUS: $2k → 8%FUQUAY VARINA EMERGENCY FOOD PANTRY: $2k → 13%SMARITANS PURSE: $3k → 21%TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $1k → 11%DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS: $1k → 17%ROADRUNNER FOOD BANK: $1k → 14%WITH LOVE FROM JESUS: $2k → 8%MILITARY MISSIONS IN ACTION: $1k → 13%SMARITANS PURSE: $1k → 21%TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $1k → 11%ROADRUNNER FOOD BANK: $1k → 14%SLEEP IN HEAVENLY PEACE: $1k → 13%SAMARITANS PURSE: $1k → 21%TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $1k → 11%ROADRUNNER FOOD BANK: $1k → 14%MAMA'S HOUSE OF THRIFT: $1k → 13%TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $1k → 11%ROADRUNNER FOOD BANK: $1k → 14%MILITARY MISSIONS IN ACTION: $1k → 13%MILITARY MISSIONS IN ACTION: $1k → 13%ACCION NEW MEXICO: $4k → 14%MAMA'S HOUSE OF THRIFT: $1k → 13%ACCION NEW MEXICO: $4k → 14%FUQUAY-VARINA EMERGENCY FOOD PANTRY: $1k → 13%ACCION NEW MEXICO: $3k → 14%FAMILY PROMISE OF WAKE COUNTY: $2k → 8%SLEEP IN HEAVENLY PEACE: $1k → 13%ACCION NEW MEXICO: $3k → 14%FAMILY PROMISE OF WAKE COUNTY: $1k → 8%MILITARY MISSIONS IN ACTION: $1k → 13%ACCION NEW MEXICO: $3k → 14%FAMILY PROMISE OF WAKE COUNTY: $1k → 8%ACCION NEW MEXICO: $2k → 14%FAMILY PROMISE OF WAKE COUNTY: $1k → 8%DREAM SPRING: $2k → 14%FAMILY PROMISE OF WAKE COUNTY: $1k → 8%DREAM SPRING: $1k → 14%FAMILY PROMISE OF WAKE COUNTY: $1k → 8%DREAM SPRING: $1k → 14%GREATER ALBUQ HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $1k → 14%GREATER ALBUQ HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $1k → 14%GREATER ALBUQ HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $1k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

NY
CT
CA
CO
NM
AR
NC
OK

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$141k · 24 repeat orgs$7k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +43% since the first grant, against +6% for the ones you funded once.

24 repeat relationships — 14 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

24
7

Total granted

$141k
$6k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+43%
+6%

Still filing today

63%
43%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Housing & ShelterFood & NutritionInternationalHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementReligionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • D
    DREAMSPRING
    9× · 2017–2025 · $23k · revenue +74%
  • MP
    MARIN PREGNANCY CLINIC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $13k · revenue +47%
  • RG
    REDWOOD GOSPEL MISSIONS
    9× · 2017–2025 · $12k · revenue +306%

Funded once

  • FT
    FEED THE CHILDREN INC
    one grant, 2022 · $1k · revenue 0%
  • NM
    NM MUSEM OF NATURAL HISTORY
    one grant, 2017 · $1k
  • SA
    SALVATION ARMY
    one grant, 2020 · $1k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Feeding San Diego

On a mission to connect every person facing hunger with nutritious meals by maximizing food rescue. through direct service and community partnerships, feeding san diego provides more than 26 million meals each year to children, families,…

Food & Nutrition
2
Food Bank of Central & Eastern Nc Inc

Nourish people. build solutions. empower communities. no one goes hungry.

Food & Nutrition
3
Second Harvest of Silicon Valley

To realize our vision of a hunger free community we will provide more food, healthy food and better access to food. we will leverage our own resources and also work with partners in the community.

Food & Nutrition
4
The Food Bank for Larimer County

To provide food to all in need through community partnerships and hunger relief programs. Our vision is a hunger-free Larimer County.

Food & Nutrition
5
Food Forward Inc

Food forward fights hunger and prevents food waste by rescuing fresh surplus produce, connecting this abundance with people experiencing food insecurity, and inspiring others to do the same.

Food & Nutrition
6
San Francisco Food Bank

To end hunger in san francisco and marin counties by soliciting food donations nationally, distributing this food to qualifying public service agencies and neighborhood pantries, advocating for improved government food programs, and…

7
Second Harvest Food Bank Santa Cruz County

Second harvest food bank's mission is to end hunger and malnutrition by educating and involving the community.

Food & Nutrition
8
The Springs Rescue Mission

To serve the poor and needy in colorado springs with the result being that lives are changed and restored to productivity as well as spiritually and socially regenerated. (continued on schedule o)it is the intent to maintain and operate…

Human Services
9
Southeast Missouri Food Bank Inc

The mission of the southeast missouri food bank is to promote food recovery; acquire and distribute food and household products; and provide community leadership and education on issues of hunger and poverty in an effort to alleviate…

Food & Nutrition
10
Sunday Breakfast Rescue Mission

A living legacy of john wanamaker, philly house's mission is to open their doors every day with a welcoming spirit of christian compassion, walking alongside the homeless, hungry, and hurting of philadelphia so that they may experience the…

Human Services
11
Share My Meals Inc

Originating in mercer county in 2020 with the mission of tackling both food insecurity and food waste, share my meals has since expanded across the state of new jersey. more than 994,000 new jersey residents are food-secure while over 1.9…

Human Services
12
Feed America First of Tennessee

Feed america first is a murfreesboro, tn based food ministry focused upon hunger relief in small towns and rural communities in middle tn and parts of al, ky and ms. since 2000 faf has distributed enough food for over 150,000,000 meals to…

Food & Nutrition

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Bay Area Rescue Mission and the most unlike its peers is Marin Pregnancy Clinic. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 32 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/19
Grantees still filing
14/19
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

MARIN PREGNANCY CLINIC — $13,000 · OtherMARIN PREGNANCY CLINICNM BOYS AND GIRLS RANCHES — $9,000 · OtherNM BOYS AND GIRLS RANCHESUNM CHILDRENS HOSPITAL — $7,000 · OtherUNM CHILDRENS HOSPITALJOY JUNCTION INC — $6,500 · OtherJOY JUNCTION INCWITH LOVE FROM JESUS — $5,700 · OtherWITH LOVE FROM JESUSGREATER ALBUQ HABITAT FOR HUMANITY — $5,000 · OtherGREATER ALBUQ HABITAT FOR HUMANITYMAMAS HOUSE OF THRIFT — $2,800 · OtherMILITARY MISSIONS IN ACTION INC — $5,300 · OtherMILITARY MISSIONS IN ACTION INC+13 more — $15,675 · Other+13 moreDREAMSPRING — $23,000 · Community ImprovementDREAMSPRINGREDWOOD GOSPEL MISSIONS — $11,500 · Housing & ShelterREDWOOD GOSPEL MI…FAMILY PROMISE OF WAKE COUNTY INC — $8,900 · Housing & ShelterFAMILY PROMISE OF…SLEEP IN HEAVENLY PEACE INC — $2,100 · Housing & ShelterSLEEP IN HEAVENLY…BAY AREA RESCUE MISSION — $8,500 · Human ServicesSTEELBRIDGE MINISTRIES FKA ALBUQUERQUE RESCUE MISSION — $3,000 · Human ServicesROADRUNNER FOOD BANK INC — $6,000 · Food & NutritionFUQUAY VARINA EMERGENCY FOOD PANTRY — $3,800 · Food & NutritionEast Mountain Food Pantry Inc dba EMFP — $500 · Food & NutritionSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION — $6,000 · EducationSAMARITAN'S PURSE — $5,400 · Religion
Other$69,975Community Improvement$23,000Housing & Shelter$22,500Human Services$11,500Food & Nutrition$10,300Education$6,000Religion$5,400

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetDREAMSPRING — $23,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetMARIN PREGNANCY CLINIC — $13,000 over 9y, 1.2% of budgetREDWOOD GOSPEL MISSIONS — $11,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetFAMILY PROMISE OF WAKE COUNTY INC — $8,900 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetBAY AREA RESCUE MISSION — $8,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION — $6,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetROADRUNNER FOOD BANK INC — $6,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE — $5,400 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMILITARY MISSIONS IN ACTION INC — $5,300 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetFUQUAY VARINA EMERGENCY FOOD PANTRY — $3,800 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetSTEELBRIDGE MINISTRIES FKA ALBUQUERQUE RESCUE MISSION — $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMAMAS HOUSE OF THRIFT — $2,800 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetSLEEP IN HEAVENLY PEACE INC — $2,100 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetABLE to Work USA Inc — $1,700 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetFEED THE CHILDREN INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSave The Children Federation Inc — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEast Mountain Food Pantry Inc dba EMFP — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds DREAMSPRING
  • Who funds MARIN PREGNANCY CLINIC
  • Who funds REDWOOD GOSPEL MISSIONS
  • Who funds FAMILY PROMISE OF WAKE COUNTY INC
  • Who funds BAY AREA RESCUE MISSION
  • Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION
  • Who funds ROADRUNNER FOOD BANK INC
  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE
  • Who funds MILITARY MISSIONS IN ACTION INC
  • Who funds FUQUAY VARINA EMERGENCY FOOD PANTRY
  • Who funds STEELBRIDGE MINISTRIES FKA ALBUQUERQUE RESCUE MISSION
  • Who funds MAMAS HOUSE OF THRIFT
  • Who funds SLEEP IN HEAVENLY PEACE INC
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
  • Who funds ABLE to Work USA Inc
  • Who funds ALS UNITED NORTH CAROLINA
  • Who funds FEED THE CHILDREN INC
  • Who funds Save The Children Federation Inc
  • Who funds East Mountain Food Pantry Inc dba EMFP

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Albuquerque Community FoundationNM13.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Albuquerque Community Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Duke Energy Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Van Allen Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 30%
  • Save the Children Federation Inc30% of income from government
  • Feed the Children Inc1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 32 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph