California · Nonprofit
REBUILDING TOGETHER SAN FRANCISCO
REBUILDING TOGETHER SAN FRANCISCO (California) receives grants from 33 organizations whose IRS filings report $1,264,020 to it, the largest being Lennox Foundation ($240,000). 16 of them have funded it in more than one year.
- Revenue FY2025
- $1.4M
- Funders on record
- 33
- Grants received
- $1.3M
- Net assets
- $1.1M
What Rebuilding Together San Francisco does
Mission
Repairing homes, revitalizing communities, rebuilding lives.
As stated on its FY2025 Form 990.
Program
Our safe at home (sah) program provides year-round repairs and modifications that increase home health and safety for low-income san franciscans. Skilled volunteers install grab bars, raised toilet seats, and handrails. Through sah we also replace worn carpet, repair rear stairways, perform minor electrical work, and more. We saw an increase in application and helped over 245 residents of san francisco.
$1,190,083 spent$605,481 earned by the program100% of program spending
The program described on its FY2025 Form 990. Program spending in total: $1,190,083.
The organization over time
Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.
Balance sheet
Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2021 to 2022, from $513k to $747k (+45%).
How it's funded, over time
Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.
Government-grant reliance: 2017 44% · 2018 47% · 2019 36% · 2020 38% · 2021 67% · 2022 48% · 2023 47% · 2024 39% · 2025 38%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.
56% of REBUILDING TOGETHER SAN FRANCISCO’s revenue is contributions — more donation-reliant than the typical peer (39% for the typical peer).
Surplus & reserves
Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 1 of the last 9 reported years ran a deficit.
reserve
Leadership and staff
The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.
Chief executive
Mahogany Roland
Executive director
Board chair
Lisa Cholmondeley
Board chair
As listed on its FY2025 Form 990.
Who funds it, year by year
2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 9 funders to 14 funders, grant income rose $98k → $226k.
8 of 33 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 28% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.
From the IRS filings of REBUILDING TOGETHER SAN FRANCISCO’s funders (the co-funder graph). Top 30 of 33 funders by total. Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
How concentrated its funding is
REBUILDING TOGETHER SAN FRANCISCO has a broad base — no single funder exceeds 19% of grant income, and it takes 4 funders to reach half.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 4 funders to its left
64% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund REBUILDING TOGETHER SAN FRANCISCO.
Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 31% · 2018 51% · 2019 45% · 2020 34% · 2021 24% · 2022 25% · 2023 21% — diversifying over time.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
How long its funders stay
44% of REBUILDING TOGETHER SAN FRANCISCO's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 48% give in more than one year at all.
Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.
Where its funders are
REBUILDING TOGETHER SAN FRANCISCO draws 70% of its grant income from funders outside California, across 10 states in all.
In-state vs out-of-state, by year
Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $360k arriving through sponsors registered in 7 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
Against its field
REBUILDING TOGETHER SAN FRANCISCO is better cushioned than half of the 2,196 housing & shelter nonprofits its size.
this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 2,196 housing & shelter nonprofits $1M–$10M, FY2025
Organizations like REBUILDING TOGETHER SAN FRANCISCO
Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
In California
Nationally
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
Where the money goes
87% of spending goes to programs.
Governance
Public support
98%
Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.
Footprint & structure
Files a return copy in 1 state
Screen this organization
A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for REBUILDING TOGETHER SAN FRANCISCO: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.
Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf
Questions and answers
- Who funds REBUILDING TOGETHER SAN FRANCISCO?
- REBUILDING TOGETHER SAN FRANCISCO (California) receives grants from 33 organizations whose IRS filings report $1,264,020 to it, the largest being Lennox Foundation ($240,000). 16 of them have funded it in more than one year.
- How many funders does REBUILDING TOGETHER SAN FRANCISCO have?
- IRS filings report 33 organizations giving $1,264,020 in grants to REBUILDING TOGETHER SAN FRANCISCO, 16 of which have funded it in more than one year.
- Who is the largest funder of REBUILDING TOGETHER SAN FRANCISCO?
- Lennox Foundation is the largest funder on record, with $240,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
- How can an organization like REBUILDING TOGETHER SAN FRANCISCO find more funders?
- Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in California. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.
These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 33 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing