Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Public charity

San Francisco Community Agencies Responding to Disaster

The organization's mission is to build a disaster-resistant community by ensuring non-profit, faith and community-based organizations serving the greater san francisco bay area's vulnerable populations are prepared for a disaster.

$303k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$86k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 62% of SAN FRANCISCO COMMUNITY AGENCIES RESPONDING TO DISASTER’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 7 grants below total $262,274 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $302,889 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $40,615 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $15k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $45k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $202k
$27,850
Median grant
1
States reached
$341k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
EDEN I&R INC$85,902
MULTICULTURAL CENTER OF MARIN$61,048
COMMUNITY YOUTH CENTERS OF SF (CYC)$55,023
COLLABORATING AGENCIES DISASTER RELIEF EFFORT (CADRE)$27,850
DEM GROUP LLC$17,000
CRIL COMMUNITY RESOURCES FOR INDEPENDENT LIVING$9,900
BETHANY UNITED METHODIST CHURCH (UMC)$5,551
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $245k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%GOLDEN GATE SENIOR SERVICES: $56k → 10%RICHMOND SENIOR CENTER (GGSS): $7k → 10%MULTICULTURAL CENTER OF MARIN: $61k → 8%CRIL COMMUNITY RESOURCES FOR INDEPENDENT LIVING: $10k → 10%SUPPORT FOR FAMILIES OF CHILDREN WITH DISABILITES: $70k → 10%JEWISH FAMILY & CHILDREN SERVICES (JFCS): $27k → 10%JEWISH FAMILY & CHILDREN SERVICES (JFCS): $4k → 10%SELF HELP FOR THE ELDERLY: $10k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

79%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.6M · 12 repeat orgs$422k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +47% since the first grant, against +15% for the ones you funded once.

12 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
13

Total granted

$1.6M
$328k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+47%
+15%

Still filing today

92%
77%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 64% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $93k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHousing & ShelterHealthPublic Safety & DisasterPublic BenefitReligionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CY
    COMMUNITY YOUTH CENTER OF SAN FRANCISCO
    6× · 2020–2025 · $376k · revenue +72%
  • EI
    Eden I & R Inc
    6× · 2020–2025 · $231k · revenue +46%
  • CA
    Collaborating Agencies Disaster Relief Effort
    6× · 2020–2025 · $172k · revenue +93%

Funded once

  • HA
    HEARING AND SPEECH CENTER OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA
    one grant, 2021 · $79k · revenue -28%
  • BH
    Bayview Hunters Point Multipurpose Senior Services Incgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $77k · revenue +67%
  • SF
    Support for Families of Children with Disabilities
    one grant, 2021 · $70k · revenue +15%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Housing Rights Committee of San Francisco Inc

The Housing Rights Committee of San Francisco is dedicated to combating the displacement crisis gripping our city by building the power of working-class tenants of color to take on the real estate industry and win housing justice for all.…

Education
2
Curry Senior Center

To provide services to seniors that promote independent living while maintaining their dignity and self-esteem.

Human Services
3
Bay Area Community Services Housing Corp

Improve the quality of life for individuals in Alameda County, Contra Costa County, Solano County, Monterey County, Sacramento County and the surrounding area in the State of California.

Housing & Shelter
4
San Francisco Ladies Protection and Relief Society
Health
5
San Francisco Senior and Disability Action Dba Senior & Disability Action

Senior & Disability Action educates and mobilizes seniors and people with disabilities to secure individual rights and social justice. We work together to create a city and world in which seniors and people with disabilities can live well…

Unclassified
6
Family Bridges Inc

We empower individuals, families, and seniors to achieve wellness, stability, and independence through culturally-competent care.

—
7
Homeownership San Francisco dba Home Sf

The Organization is a citywide collaborative of housing counseling agencies that helps diverse and underserved households achieve and sustain homeownership in San Francisco.

—
8
Silicon Valley Independent Living Center

SVILC builds disability identity, culture, pride, creating opportunities for personal and community transformation, and partnering with others to ensure that civil and human rights are protected.

Human Services
9
San Francisco Village

San Francisco Village is an innovative membership organization that enables residents to age in their own homes. The Village is dedicated to building community connections for San Francisco residents aged 60 and older, assisted by a robust…

Human Services
10
Bayanihan Equity Center

The Bayanihan Equity Center provides culturally responsive services to address the needs and advance the rights of marginalized communities in pursuit of equity and justice.

Public Benefit
11
Sutter Bay Hospitals

MISSION STATEMENT: MISSION: CARING FOR OUR PATIENTS FIRST AND OUR PEOPLE ALWAYS. VISION: TO BE THE MOST COMPREHENSIVE, INTEGRATED AND CONNECTED HEALTH SYSTEM FOR GETTING AND STAYING WELL. VALUES: EXCELLENCE - We deliver high-quality,…

Health
12
Bernal Heights Neighborhood Center

BHNC focuses on the needs of people with low and moderate incomes. We work to accomplish our mission by: (1) developing affordable housing throughout San Francisco; (2) providing linguistically and culturally responsive services to our…

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Family and Children's Services and the most unlike its peers is United Policyholders. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 47 years old; the field is 15. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number23%0%<5yr15%4%5–10yr19%13%10–20yr18%25%20–35yr13%42%35–55yr12%17%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value23%0%<5yr15%10%5–10yr19%5%10–20yr18%23%20–35yr13%58%35–55yr12%4%55yr+

The field is 23% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 7% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
7%
2/30
the rest of the field
12%
2,057/16,652

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

26 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 26 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
24/26
Grantees still filing
18/26
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

COMMUNITY YOUTH CENTER OF SAN FRANCISCO — $375,991 · OtherCOMMUNITY YOUTH CENTER OF SAN FRANCISCOEden I & R Inc — $231,412 · OtherEden I & R IncTHE UNITED COUNCIL OF HUMAN SERVICE — $202,207 · OtherTHE UNITED COUNCIL OF HUMAN SERVICECenter for Volunteer & Nonprofit Leadership — $110,610 · OtherCenter for Volunteer & Nonprofit LeadershipHEARING AND SPEECH CENTER OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA — $79,234 · OtherHEARING AND SPEECH CENTER OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIABayview Hunters Point Multipurpose Senior Services Inc — $77,063 · OtherBayview Hunters Point Multipurpose Senior Services IncGood Samaritan Family Resource Center of San Francisco — $47,500 · Other+8 more — $129,310 · Other+8 moreSupport for Families of Children with Disabilities — $69,540 · Human ServicesSupport for F…GOLDEN GATE SENIOR SERVICES — $63,750 · Human ServicesGOLDEN GATE S…The Multicultural Center of Marin — $61,048 · Human ServicesThe Multicult…JEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICES — $30,845 · Human ServicesJEWISH FAMILY…SELF-HELP FOR THE ELDERLY — $10,000 · Human ServicesCommunity Resources for Independent Living Inc — $9,900 · Human ServicesCollaborating Agencies Disaster Relief Effort — $171,982 · Public Safety & DisasterCollabora…Livable City — $150,887 · Public BenefitNICOS CHINESE HEALTH COALITION — $132,562 · HealthNORTH EAST MEDICAL SERVICES — $10,000 · HealthREBUILDING TOGETHER SAN FRANCISCO — $25,000 · Housing & ShelterCHINATOWN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CENTER — $10,000 · Housing & ShelterBAYVIEW SENIOR HOUSING INC — $1,379 · Housing & ShelterCommunity Living Campaign — $10,000 · Civil RightsGLIDE FOUNDATION — $10,000 · Religion
Other$1,253,327Human Services$245,083Public Safety & Disaster$171,982Public Benefit$150,887Health$142,562Housing & Shelter$36,379Civil Rights$10,000Religion$10,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCOMMUNITY YOUTH CENTER OF SAN FRANCISCO — $375,991 over 6y, 1.0% of budgetEden I & R Inc — $231,412 over 6y, 2.3% of budgetTHE UNITED COUNCIL OF HUMAN SERVICE — $202,207 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetCollaborating Agencies Disaster Relief Effort — $171,982 over 6y, 23% of budgetLivable City — $150,887 over 3y, 2.9% of budgetNICOS CHINESE HEALTH COALITION — $132,562 over 2y, 11% of budgetCenter for Volunteer & Nonprofit Leadership — $110,610 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetHEARING AND SPEECH CENTER OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA — $79,234 over 1y, 3.2% of budgetBayview Hunters Point Multipurpose Senior Services Inc — $77,063 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetSupport for Families of Children with Disabilities — $69,540 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetGOLDEN GATE SENIOR SERVICES — $63,750 over 2y, 4.1% of budgetThe Multicultural Center of Marin — $61,048 over 1y, 4.2% of budgetGood Samaritan Family Resource Center of San Francisco — $47,500 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICES — $30,845 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMISSION GRADUATES — $30,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetUnited Policyholders — $29,443 over 2y, 2.3% of budgetREBUILDING TOGETHER SAN FRANCISCO — $25,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetCONARD HOUSE INC — $21,316 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCommunity Living Campaign — $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetNORTH EAST MEDICAL SERVICES — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS OF SAN FRANCISCO INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHINATOWN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CENTER — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSELF-HELP FOR THE ELDERLY — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCommunity Resources for Independent Living Inc — $9,900 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetBAYVIEW SENIOR HOUSING INC — $1,379 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The San Francisco Fou…Silicon Valley Commun…Kaiser Foundation Hos…McNabb FoundationUnited Way of the Bay…Marin Community Found…Young Men's Christian…Metta FundExtrafoodTipping Point Communi…Bothin FoundationCrankstart Foundation
The San Francisco FoundationCA32.9× affinity16 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The San Francisco Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · McNabb Foundation · United Way of the Bay Area · Marin Community Foundation · Young Men's Christian Association of San Francisco · Metta Fund · Extrafood · Tipping Point Community · Bothin Foundation · Crankstart Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization San Francisco Community Agencies Responding to Disaster funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%your share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    18report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 30 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home
    State money flows
    the interactive map of money crossing state lines