· Private foundation
Touchpoint Foundation - Host
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k39 grants · $157k
- $10k–50k8 grants · $105k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| BRING CHANGE 2 MIND | $30,000 |
| SENIOR COASTSIDERS INC | $15,000 |
| BISHOP - SF STUDY CTR | $10,000 |
| MEALS ON WHEELS OF SAN FRANCISCO INC | $10,000 |
| ON LOK 30TH STREET SENIOR CENTER | $10,000 |
| BROWN UNIVERSITY OF PROVIDENCE | $10,000 |
| EASTSIDE COLLEGE PREPARATORY SCHOOL | $10,000 |
| THE ARC SAN FRANCISCO | $10,000 |
| COASTSIDE ADULT DAY HEALTH CENTER | $7,500 |
| HOSPICE OF SANTA CRUZ COUNTY | $6,500 |
| CURRY SENIOR CENTER | $6,000 |
| LIGHTHOUSE FOR THE BLIND & VISUALLY IMPAIRED | $5,000 |
| SONOMA VALLEY EDUCATION FOUNDATION | $5,000 |
| SUNNYVALE COMMUNITY SERVICES | $5,000 |
| BIG WAVE PROJECT | $5,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–25, $437k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 19% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +39% since the first grant, against +4% for the ones you funded once.
44 repeat relationships — 28 still active in FY2025, 16 since wound down; 16 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 73% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $68k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- SCSENIOR COASTSIDERS INC7× · 2019–2025 · $193k · revenue +45%
- MOMEALS ON WHEELS OF SAN FRANCISCO INC7× · 2019–2025 · $52k · revenue +41%
- MOMEALS ON WHEELS DIABLO REGION5× · 2019–2024 · $29k · revenue +143%
Funded once
- HSHumboldt Senior Resource Centergraduatedone grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue +51%
- COCITY OF FREMONTone grant, 2022 · $9k
- SLSEQUOIA LIVING INCone grant, 2024 · $5k · revenue 0%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To enhance the quality of life for our aging community by providing services that promote wellbeing and maintain independence.
Senior & Disability Action educates and mobilizes seniors and people with disabilities to secure individual rights and social justice. We work together to create a city and world in which seniors and people with disabilities can live well…
Senior Access's mission is to help Marin's older and disabled adults remain independent and part of the community for as long as possible.
Project Open Hand's mission is to improve health outcomes and quality of life by providing nutritious meals to the sick and vulnerable, caring for and educating our community.
San Francisco Village is an innovative membership organization that enables residents to age in their own homes. The Village is dedicated to building community connections for San Francisco residents aged 60 and older, assisted by a robust…
MISSION STATEMENT: MISSION: CARING FOR OUR PATIENTS FIRST AND OUR PEOPLE ALWAYS. VISION: TO BE THE MOST COMPREHENSIVE, INTEGRATED AND CONNECTED HEALTH SYSTEM FOR GETTING AND STAYING WELL. VALUES: EXCELLENCE - We deliver high-quality,…
No senior should go hungry. nutritious meals, which are delivered by caring volunteers, improve the health and well-being of people who are homebound, elderly, or disabled and help them remain in their homes and maintain their independence.
To empower seniors, disabled adults, veterans, and other under served populations to remain independent by nourishing their bodies, minds, and spirits, and drive out hunger and isolation in our region.
Self-help for the elderly strives to promote the independence, well-being, and dignity for older adults through culturally aligned services and programs in the san francisco bay area.
We foster the independence and dignity of older adults by reducing food insecurity and isolation, with daily nutritious meals, friendly visits, and connection to support services.
Enable frail seniors to maintain their independence at home by providing them with high quality, nutritious meals that are cost effective, prepared in West Contra Costa County, delivered by caring drivers and administered by local…
Senior advocacy services promotes the health, dignity, rights and quality of life of seniors and disabled in the north bay.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Meals On Wheels of San Francisco Inc and the most unlike its peers is Anewvista Community Services. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 32 years old; the field is 13. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
82 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 82 of the 103 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds SENIOR COASTSIDERS INC ↗
- Who funds MEALS ON WHEELS OF SAN FRANCISCO INC ↗
- Who funds BRING CHANGE 2 MIND ↗
- Who funds THE ARC SAN FRANCISCO ↗
- Who funds MEALS ON WHEELS DIABLO REGION ↗
- Who funds Table of Plenty HMB ↗
- Who funds HOSPICE OF SANTA CRUZ COUNTY ↗
- Who funds COASTSIDE ADULT DAY HEALTH CENTER ↗
- Who funds HEART OF THE VALLEY SERVICES FOR SENIORS INC ↗
- Who funds SONRISAS DENTAL HEALTH INC ↗
- Who funds THE HEALTH TRUST ↗
- Who funds COASTSIDE HOPE ↗
- Who funds EASTSIDE COLLEGE PREPARATORY SCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds VIA REHABILITATION SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds PENINSULA FAMILY SERVICE ↗
- Who funds TEEN KITCHEN PROJECT ↗
- Who funds LOS ALTOS MOUNTAIN VIEW COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ON LOK DAY SERVICES ↗
- Who funds SAN FRANCISCO FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds MAVERICKS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds NAMI SANTA CLARA COUNTY ↗
- Who funds PENINSULA VOLUNTEERS INC ↗
- Who funds Vivalon ↗
- Who funds BIG WAVE GROUP ↗
- Who funds BROWN UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds CURRY SENIOR CENTER ↗
- Who funds SUNNYVALE COMMUNITY SERVICES ↗
- Who funds REBUILDING TOGETHER SAN FRANCISCO ↗
- Who funds Legal Assistance to the Elderly ↗
- Who funds AGEUP INC ↗
- Who funds Community Living Campaign ↗
- Who funds Humboldt Senior Resource Center ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · Gordon E and Betty I Moore Foundation · McNabb Foundation · Atkinson Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · The San Francisco Foundation · Bothin Foundation · The Joseph and Vera Long Foundation · East Bay Community Foundation · Marin Community Foundation · Sutter Bay Hospitals · Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & Sonoma
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Touchpoint Foundation - Host funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.