Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →
Plinth

· Public charity

Rebuilding Together Inc

Make essential repairs in partnership with our neighbors to support safe and healthy housing.

$5.8M
Granted FY2024still arriving
75
Grants FY2024still arriving
33
States reached
$637k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.

Housing & Shelter$42MCommunity Improvement$2.2MHuman Services$2.1MRecreation & Sports$188kArts & Culture$64kEnvironment$10k
02FY2024 · 75 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k4 grants · $16k
  • $10k–50k29 grants · $759k
  • $50k–250k39 grants · $4.5M
  • $250k+3 grants · $1.4M
$54,491
Median grant
33
States reached
$12M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GREATER FLORIDA$637,100
NEW ORLEANS$416,019
SOUTHERN NEVADA$301,958
GREATER CHARLOTTE$236,628
SILICON VALLEY$227,800
MINNESOTA$215,982
NORTH CENTRAL FLORIDA$213,597
NORTH TEXAS$209,012
MIAMIDADE$196,834
DCALEXANDRIA$189,333
DAYTON$188,400
RICHMOND$175,700
AUSTIN SAN ANTONIO$171,222
COLORADO$155,976
NASHVILLE$139,210
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $4.0M) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 95% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%REBUILDING TOGETHER VALLEY OF THE SUN: $149k → 11%REBUILDING TOGETHER LONG ISLAND: $47k → 7%REBUILDING TOGETHER AUSTIN: $86k → 10%REBUILDING TOGETHER BRYAN-COLLEGE STATION: $25k → 22%REBUILDING TOGETHER MIAMI-DADE: $213k → 15%REBUILDING TOGETHER SHAWNEE-JOHNSON COUNTY: $26k → 5%REBUILDING TOGETHER ROGUE VALLEY: $158k → 13%REBUILDING TOGETHER NORTHEAST OHIO: $148k → 13%REBUILDING TOGETHER CENTRAL OHIO: $51k → 15%FARGOMOORHEAD AREA: $36k → 12%REBUILDING TOGETHER VALLEY OF THE SUN: $115k → 11%REBUILDING TOGETHER LONG ISLAND: $40k → 7%REBUILDING TOGETHER AUSTIN: $64k → 10%REBUILDING TOGETHER BRYAN-COLLEGE STATION: $13k → 22%MIAMIDADE: $197k → 15%REBUILDING TOGETHER ROGUE VALLEY: $105k → 13%REBUILDING TOGETHER NORTHEAST OHIO: $144k → 13%REBUILDING TOGETHER CENTRAL OHIO: $43k → 15%REBUILDING TOGETHER FARGO-MOORHEAD AREA: $41k → 12%VALLEY OF THE SUN: $92k → 11%REBUILDING TOGETHER LONG ISLAND: $39k → 7%REBUILDING TOGETHER AUSTIN: $48k → 10%REBUILDING TOGETHER MIAMI-DADE: $108k → 15%ROGUE VALLEY: $59k → 13%REBUILDING TOGETHER NORTHEAST OHIO: $108k → 13%REBUILDING TOGETHER FARGO-MOORHEAD AREA: $37k → 12%REBUILDING TOGETHER VALLEY OF THE SUN: $58k → 11%REBUILDING TOGETHER LONG ISLAND: $20k → 7%REBUILDING TOGETHER AUSTIN: $37k → 10%REBUILDING TOGETHER MIAMI-DADE: $87k → 15%REBUILDING TOGETHER NORTHEAST OHIO: $107k → 13%REBUILDING TOGETHER FARGO-MOORHEAD AREA: $34k → 12%REBUILDING TOGETHER VALLEY OF THE SUN: $186k → 11%REBUILDING TOGETHER MIAMI-DADE: $81k → 15%REBUILDING TOGETHER NORTHEAST OHIO: $83k → 13%REBUILDING TOGETHER FARGO-MOORHEAD AREA: $34k → 12%REBUILDING TOGETHER VALLEY OF THE SUN: $115k → 11%REBUILDING TOGETHER MIAMI-DADE: $239k → 15%REBUILDING TOGETHER NORTHEAST OHIO: $82k → 13%REBUILDING TOGETHER FARGO-MOORHEAD AREA: $27k → 12%REBUILDING TOGETHER VALLEY OF THE SUN: $80k → 11%REBUILDING TOGETHER MIAMI-DADE: $147k → 15%REBUILDING TOGETHER NORTHEAST OHIO: $21k → 13%REBUILDING TOGETHER FARGO-MOORHEAD AREA: $17k → 12%REBUILDING TOGETHER VALLEY OF THE SUN: $59k → 11%REBUILDING TOGETHER MIAMI-DADE: $136k → 15%NORTHEAST OHIO: $92k → 13%REBUILDING TOGETHER FARGO-MOORHEAD AREA: $16k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ME
VT
WA
ID
MT
ND
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
CO
NE
MO
WV
VA
MD
AZ
NM
KS
TN
NC
SC
DC
OK
LA
AL
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 100% of Rebuilding Together Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

Rebuilding Together Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$47M · 118 repeat orgs$119k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +46% since the first grant, against +28% for the ones you funded once.

118 repeat relationships — 75 still active in FY2024, 43 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

118
16

Total granted

$47M
$119k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+46%
+28%

Still filing today

84%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Housing & ShelterHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementPhilanthropyEducationRecreation & SportsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RT
    REBUILDING TOGETHER GREATER FLORIDA INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $2.7M · revenue +471%
  • RT
    Rebuilding Together of Greater Charlotte
    8× · 2017–2024 · $1.8M · revenue ×30 · 71% of their budget
  • PA
    PRESERVATION ALLIANCE OF NEW ORLEANS IN
    8× · 2017–2024 · $1.7M · revenue +35% · 27% of their budget

Funded once

  • RT
    Rebuilding Together Quad Cities
    one grant, 2017 · $15k
  • LG
    LOUDOUN GIVING HANDS
    one grant, 2018 · $14k
  • CC
    Christmas-In-April Calvert County Incgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $12k · revenue +28%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Rebuilding Together of Washington Dc

Volunteer teams rehabilitate homes for low-income elderly and disabledhomeowners, veterans, and families with children, as well as nonprofitfacilities such as schools, shelters, and community service organizations. all work is performed by…

—
2
Renovating Lives
Education
3
Rebuilding Together Inc

Make essential repairs in partnership with our neighbors to support safe and healthy housing.

Housing & Shelter
4
Born Again Ministries

To provide or connect low -income or ex-offenders affordable houses who wouldn't otherwise have the opportunity to have a bighter future

Health
5
Rebuilding Together Spartanburg Inc

Repair/rehabilitate homes of disadvantaged homeowners in the upstate of sc through rebuilding days as well as special projects with various community groups.

Human Services
6
Builders of Hope

Free home repair for low income (<80% AMI) homeowners.

Public Safety & Disaster
7
Revitalize Community Development Corporation

Revitalizing homes, neighborhoods and lives through preservation, education and community involvement.

—
8
The Restoration Team

The Restoration Team is a Houston based grassroots organization that provides critical home repairs to low-income families at no cost. We bring volunteers and donors together to make life changing improvements to homes. We work with dozens…

Public Safety & Disaster
9
Restoration Ministries of West Texas

Help needy have secure housing via home repairs.

—
10
Table Talk Foundation for Better Living Inc

We make free home repairs for the elderly the disabled and the indigent

—
11
Hopebuilders Home Repair Inc

Serving older adults and individuals liviing with disabilities by providing accessibility and home repair

Housing & Shelter
12
Rusted and Weathered Inc

Provide free home repair to low-income Veterans, Elderly, and Disabled.

Housing & Shelter

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Rebuilding Together - St Louis and the most unlike its peers is Rebuilding Together Shawnee Johnson County Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 30 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%0%<5yr14%3%5–10yr19%14%10–20yr16%73%20–35yr13%10%35–55yr16%0%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%2%5–10yr19%11%10–20yr16%69%20–35yr13%18%35–55yr16%0%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 4% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
4%5/134
the rest of the field
13%
240,391/1,819,431

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

118 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 118 of the 134 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

43
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
55
Early backer (in before they grew)
107/118
Grantees still filing
87/118
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

REBUILDING TOGETHER SAN ANTONIO INC — $4,187,500 · Housing & ShelterREBUILDING TOGETHER SAN ANTONIO INCRebuilding Together Houston — $3,029,242 · Housing & ShelterRebuilding Together HoustonREBUILDING TOGETHER GREATER FLORIDA INC — $2,658,794 · Housing & ShelterREBUILDING TOGETHER GREATER FLORIDA INCRebuilding Together of Greater Charlotte — $1,764,012 · Housing & ShelterRebuilding Together of Greater CharlotteRebuilding Together - Twin Cities — $1,213,640 · Housing & ShelterREBUILDING TOGETHER SOUTHERN NEVADA — $1,155,360 · Housing & ShelterPRESERVING HOME INC — $1,056,920 · Housing & ShelterREBUILDING TOGETHER BALTIMORE INC — $1,014,617 · Housing & Shelter+50 more — $11,507,425 · Housing & Shelter+50 moreRebuilding Together DC Alexandria — $1,224,047 · OtherRebuilding Together…REBUILDING TOGETHER ATLANTA INC — $927,200 · OtherREBUILDING TOGETHER…REBUILDING TOGETHER PHILADELPHIA — $625,575 · OtherREBUILDING TOGETHER…REBUILDING TOGETHER NASHVILLE INC — $538,684 · OtherREBUILDING TOGETHER…REBUILDING TOGETHER SEATTLE — $532,249 · OtherREBUILDING TOGETHER…REBUILDING TOGETHER OF CENTRAL FLORIDA INC — $453,350 · OtherREBUILDING TOGETHER…REBUILDING TOGETHER OF RICHMOND — $440,442 · OtherREBUILDING TOGETHER…REBUILDING TOGETHER LONG BEACH — $438,090 · OtherREBUILDING TOGETHER…REBUILDING TOGETHER ACADIANA INC — $327,569 · OtherREBUILDING TOGETHER HUDSON VALLEY INC — $296,369 · Other+34 more — $2,332,969 · Other+34 morePRESERVATION ALLIANCE OF NEW ORLEANS IN — $1,654,972 · Community ImprovementPRESERVATIO…REBUILDING TOGETHER METRO DENVER INC — $1,250,886 · Community ImprovementREBUILDING …REBUILDING TOGETHER - ST LOUIS — $700,450 · Community ImprovementREBUILDING …REBUILDING TOGETHER BOSTON INC — $368,448 · Community ImprovementREBUILDING …REBUILDING TOGETHER-EL PASO INC — $308,455 · Community ImprovementREBUILDING …REBUILDING TOGETHER AURORA — $217,400 · Community Improvement+5 more — $194,900 · Community ImprovementREBUILDING TOGETHER MIAMI-DADE INC — $1,206,834 · Human ServicesREBUILDING…REBUILDING TOGETHER VALLEY OF THE SUN INC — $853,892 · Human ServicesREBUILDING…REBUILDING TOGETHER NORTHEAST OHIO INC — $784,487 · Human ServicesREBUILDING…REBUILDING TOGETHER AUSTIN SAN ANTONIO — $577,501 · Human ServicesREBUILDING…REBUILDING TOGETHER ROGUE VALLEY — $329,214 · Human ServicesREBUILDING…REBUILDING TOGETHER FARGO-MOORHEAD AREA INC — $242,312 · Human ServicesREBUILDING…REBUILDING TOGETHER LONG ISLAND INC — $154,000 · Human Services+7 more — $271,659 · Human Services+7 moreREBUILDING TOGETHER- ANNE ARUNDEL — $406,520 · PhilanthropyREBUILDING TOGETHER GREATER DES MOI — $158,350 · PhilanthropyREBUILDING TOGETHER-MOUNTAIN COMMUNITIES — $73,183 · PhilanthropyREBUILDING TOGETHER SILICON VALLEY — $590,096 · EducationREBUILDING TOGETHER PACIFIC NW — $28,400 · EducationREBUILDING TOGETHER DAYTON INC — $520,866 · Recreation & SportsREBUILDING TOGETHER BATON ROUGE INC — $174,195 · Public Safety & Disaster
Housing & Shelter$27,587,510Other$8,136,544Community Improvement$4,695,511Human Services$4,419,899Philanthropy$638,053Education$618,496Recreation & Sports$520,866Public Safety & Disaster$174,195

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetREBUILDING TOGETHER SAN ANTONIO INC — $4,187,500 over 5y, 69% of budgetRebuilding Together Houston — $3,029,242 over 8y, 39% of budgetREBUILDING TOGETHER GREATER FLORIDA INC — $2,658,794 over 8y, 18% of budgetRebuilding Together of Greater Charlotte — $1,764,012 over 8y, 71% of budgetPRESERVATION ALLIANCE OF NEW ORLEANS IN — $1,654,972 over 8y, 27% of budgetREBUILDING TOGETHER METRO DENVER INC — $1,250,886 over 8y, 65% of budgetRebuilding Together DC Alexandria — $1,224,047 over 8y, 42% of budgetRebuilding Together - Twin Cities — $1,213,640 over 8y, 21% of budgetREBUILDING TOGETHER MIAMI-DADE INC — $1,206,834 over 8y, 17% of budgetREBUILDING TOGETHER SOUTHERN NEVADA — $1,155,360 over 8y, 9.7% of budgetPRESERVING HOME INC — $1,056,920 over 8y, 14% of budgetREBUILDING TOGETHER BALTIMORE INC — $1,014,617 over 8y, 31% of budgetREBUILDING TOGETHER ATLANTA INC — $927,200 over 8y, 63% of budgetREBUILDING TOGETHER VALLEY OF THE SUN INC — $853,892 over 8y, 24% of budgetREBUILDING TOGETHER NORTHEAST OHIO INC — $784,487 over 8y, 19% of budgetREBUILDING TOGETHER GREATER DALLAS INC — $761,447 over 8y, 46% of budgetREBUILDING TOGETHER METRO CHICAGO — $707,862 over 8y, 23% of budgetREBUILDING TOGETHER - ST LOUIS — $700,450 over 8y, 10% of budgetREBUILDING TOGETHER PETALUMA INC — $626,995 over 8y, 85% of budgetREBUILDING TOGETHER PHILADELPHIA — $625,575 over 8y, 5.9% of budgetREBUILDING TOGETHER SILICON VALLEY — $590,096 over 7y, 7.0% of budgetREBUILDING TOGETHER AUSTIN SAN ANTONIO — $577,501 over 8y, 11% of budgetREBUILDING TOGETHER OF THE CITY OF ANGELS — $564,453 over 4y, 41% of budgetREBUILDING TOGETHER NASHVILLE INC — $538,684 over 8y, 22% of budgetREBUILDING TOGETHER SARATOGA COUNTY INC — $537,802 over 8y, 4.0% of budgetREBUILDING TOGETHER SEATTLE — $532,249 over 8y, 30% of budgetREBUILDING TOGETHER DAYTON INC — $520,866 over 8y, 7.4% of budgetRebuilding Together North Central F — $520,194 over 8y, 13% of budgetREBUILDING TOGETHER PITTSBURGH — $499,250 over 8y, 2.5% of budgetREBUILDING TOGETHER NORTH JERSEY INC — $482,800 over 8y, 36% of budgetREBUILDING TOGETHER OF CENTRAL FLORIDA INC — $453,350 over 5y, 31% of budgetREBUILDING TOGETHER NYC — $441,061 over 8y, 3.6% of budgetREBUILDING TOGETHER OF RICHMOND — $440,442 over 7y, 28% of budgetREBUILDING TOGETHER LONG BEACH — $438,090 over 8y, 40% of budgetREBUILDING TOGETHER- ANNE ARUNDEL — $406,520 over 8y, 65% of budgetREBUILDING TOGETHER - SAN DIEGO — $376,500 over 8y, 43% of budgetREBUILDING TOGETHER BOSTON INC — $368,448 over 8y, 34% of budgetRebuilding Together Pitt County NC Inc — $350,212 over 6y, 72% of budgetRebuilding Together South Sound — $349,946 over 8y, 7.8% of budgetREBUILDING TOGETHER BROWARD COUNTY INC — $336,590 over 8y, 7.8% of budgetREBUILDING TOGETHER ROGUE VALLEY — $329,214 over 4y, 26% of budgetREBUILDING TOGETHER ACADIANA INC — $327,569 over 8y, 24% of budgetREBUILDING TOGETHER PLATTE VALLEY EAST INC — $316,954 over 8y, 45% of budgetRebuilding Together Peninsula — $311,040 over 8y, 3.4% of budgetREBUILDING TOGETHER HOWARD COUNTY INC — $310,133 over 8y, 21% of budgetREBUILDING TOGETHER-EL PASO INC — $308,455 over 8y, 23% of budgetREBUILDING TOGETHER SOUTHEAST MICHIGAN INC — $307,775 over 7y, 30% of budgetRebuilding Together Kansas City Inc — $304,607 over 8y, 8.9% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds REBUILDING TOGETHER SAN ANTONIO INC ↗
  • Who funds Rebuilding Together Houston ↗
  • Who funds REBUILDING TOGETHER GREATER FLORIDA INC ↗
  • Who funds Rebuilding Together of Greater Charlotte ↗
  • Who funds PRESERVATION ALLIANCE OF NEW ORLEANS IN ↗
  • Who funds REBUILDING TOGETHER METRO DENVER INC ↗
  • Who funds Rebuilding Together DC Alexandria ↗
  • Who funds Rebuilding Together - Twin Cities ↗
  • Who funds REBUILDING TOGETHER MIAMI-DADE INC ↗
  • Who funds REBUILDING TOGETHER SOUTHERN NEVADA ↗
  • Who funds PRESERVING HOME INC ↗
  • Who funds REBUILDING TOGETHER BALTIMORE INC ↗
  • Who funds REBUILDING TOGETHER ATLANTA INC ↗
  • Who funds REBUILDING TOGETHER VALLEY OF THE SUN INC ↗
  • Who funds REBUILDING TOGETHER NORTHEAST OHIO INC ↗
  • Who funds REBUILDING TOGETHER GREATER DALLAS INC ↗
  • Who funds REBUILDING TOGETHER METRO CHICAGO ↗
  • Who funds REBUILDING TOGETHER - ST LOUIS ↗
  • Who funds REBUILDING TOGETHER PETALUMA INC ↗
  • Who funds REBUILDING TOGETHER PHILADELPHIA ↗
  • Who funds REBUILDING TOGETHER SILICON VALLEY ↗
  • Who funds REBUILDING TOGETHER AUSTIN SAN ANTONIO ↗
  • Who funds REBUILDING TOGETHER OF THE CITY OF ANGELS ↗
  • Who funds REBUILDING TOGETHER NASHVILLE INC ↗
  • Who funds REBUILDING TOGETHER SARATOGA COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds REBUILDING TOGETHER SEATTLE ↗
  • Who funds REBUILDING TOGETHER DAYTON INC ↗
  • Who funds Rebuilding Together North Central F ↗
  • Who funds REBUILDING TOGETHER PITTSBURGH ↗
  • Who funds REBUILDING TOGETHER NORTH JERSEY INC ↗
  • Who funds REBUILDING TOGETHER OF CENTRAL FLORIDA INC ↗
  • Who funds REBUILDING TOGETHER NYC ↗
  • Who funds REBUILDING TOGETHER OF RICHMOND ↗
  • Who funds REBUILDING TOGETHER LONG BEACH ↗
  • Who funds REBUILDING TOGETHER- ANNE ARUNDEL ↗
  • Who funds REBUILDING TOGETHER - SAN DIEGO ↗
  • Who funds REBUILDING TOGETHER BOSTON INC ↗
  • Who funds Rebuilding Together Pitt County NC Inc ↗
  • Who funds Rebuilding Together South Sound ↗
  • Who funds REBUILDING TOGETHER BROWARD COUNTY INC ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Republic Services Cha…THDF II Inc DBA The H…Td Charitable Foundat…Wells Fargo FoundationUmpqua Bank Charitabl…Housing Assistance Co…Washington Federal Fo…National Voluntary Or…Texas State Affordabl…The Wilson Sonsini Go…Volunteer Florida Fou…The Joseph and Vera L…
Republic Services Charitable FoundationAZ40.6× affinity17 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Republic Services Charitable Foundation · THDF II Inc DBA The Home Depot Foundation & Homer Fund · Td Charitable Foundation · Wells Fargo Foundation · Umpqua Bank Charitable Foundation · Housing Assistance Council · Washington Federal Foundation · National Voluntary Organizations Active in Disaster Inc · Texas State Affordable Housing Corporation · The Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati Foundation · Volunteer Florida Foundation Inc · The Joseph and Vera Long Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Rebuilding Together Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 80%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 12%
  • Rebuilding Together Eastern Shore Inc — 12% of income from government
  • Umpqua Community Development Corp — 12% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
8get no government money at all
51report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 134 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home