Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Public charity

Episcopal Impact Fund FKA Episcopal Charities

Episcopal Impact Fund has a vision of a Bay Area where all our neighbors have the opportunities and resources they need to thrive

$478k
Granted FY2024still arriving
12
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$45k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 51% of Episcopal Impact Fund FKA Episcopal Charities’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2024 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 12 grants below total $386,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $477,500 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $91,500 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $12k
  • $10k–50k10 grants · $374k
$40,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$7.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Greater Richmond Interfaith Project$45,000
Beyond Emancipation$40,000
Youth Spirit Artworks (Tiny House Empowerment Village)$40,000
Nonprofit Housing Association of Northern California (NPH)$40,000
Center for Domestic Peace$40,000
San Francisco SafeHouse$40,000
Alameda Point Collaborative$40,000
Sister to Sister 2Serenity House Oakland$40,000
Human Investment Project Inc (HIP Housing)$30,000
Sojourn Chaplaincy$19,400
Ohlhoff Recovery Programs$6,100
Grace Cathedral Jail Ministry$5,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $542k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%NEW CREATION HOME MINISTRIES: $30k → 8%ABUNDANT GRACE COASTSIDE WORKER: $10k → 7%New Creation Home Ministries: $30k → 8%ABUNDANT GRACE COASTSIDE WORKER: $10k → 7%Alameda Point Collaborative: $40k → 10%ABUNDANT GRACE COASTSIDE WORKER: $8k → 7%Center for Domestic Peace: $40k → 8%ST VINCENT DE PAUL SOCIETY OF MARIN: $25k → 8%MONUMENT CRISIS CENTER: $10k → 9%MONUMENT CRISIS CENTER: $10k → 9%MONUMENT CRISIS CENTER: $10k → 9%San Francisco SafeHouse: $40k → 10%FIRST PLACE FOR YOUTH: $25k → 10%Housing Consortium of the East Bay: $10k → 10%Episcopal Community Services: $5k → 10%YMCA OF EAST BAY: $10k → 10%Beyond Emancipation: $40k → 10%BEYOND EMANCIPATION: $30k → 10%Beyond Emancipation: $30k → 10%Raphael House: $25k → 10%BEYOND EMANCIPATION: $10k → 10%BEYOND EMANCIPATION: $10k → 10%A DIAMOND IN THE RUFF: $10k → 10%RAPHAEL HOUSE: $24k → 10%BEYOND EMANCIPATION: $10k → 10%Parent Voices Oakland: $20k → 10%PARENT VOICES OAKLAND: $20k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

58%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.4M · 33 repeat orgs$1.0M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +70% since the first grant, against +26% for the ones you funded once.

33 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2024, 28 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

33
61

Total granted

$1.4M
$782k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+70%
+26%

Still filing today

52%
34%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 39% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $236k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHousing & ShelterYouth DevelopmentCivil RightsHealthEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • OE
    Oakland Elizabeth House
    3× · 2019–2023 · $90k · revenue +83%
  • S2
    SISTER-TO-SISTER 2 INCORPORATED
    2× · 2022–2024 · $65k · revenue +99%
  • RH
    RAPHAEL HOUSE OF SAN FRANCISCO INC
    2× · 2022–2023 · $49k · revenue +32%

Funded once

  • AO
    ARIEL OUTREACH MISSION
    one grant, 2023 · $50k · revenue -44% · 28% of their budget
  • GC
    GLOBAL COMMUNICATION EDUCATION & ART
    one grant, 2023 · $50k
  • OE
    OAKLAND ELIZABETH HOUSE
    one grant, 2020 · $30k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Bay Area Community Services Housing Corp

Improve the quality of life for individuals in Alameda County, Contra Costa County, Solano County, Monterey County, Sacramento County and the surrounding area in the State of California.

Housing & Shelter
2
San Francisco Network Ministries Housing Corporation

San Francisco Network Ministries Housing Corporation works to empower and support women who are experiencing housing instability and sexual exploitation or trafficking, by creating survivor-centered spaces, services advocacy and community…

Unclassified
3
Bay Area Community Services Inc

BACS' mission is to uplift under-served individuals and their families by doing "whatever it takes." BACS helps people experiencing homelessness, housing insecurity, or behavioural health challenges while balancing other complications like…

—
4
The San Francisco Particular Council of the Society of St Vincent De Paul

The mission of the st. vincent de paul society of san francisco (svdp-sf) is to offer hope and service on a direct person-to-person basis, working to break the cycles of homelessness and domestic violence.

Human Services
5
Homeward Bound of Marin

Homeward Bound is the main provider of emergency shelter, supportive housing and services for people overcoming a crisis of homelessness in Marin County, California. Our mission of "opening doors to safety, dignity, hope, and…

Housing & Shelter
6
Community Forward Sf Inc

Community Forward SF's support services create pathways from crisis to long-term stability through our Women's Wellness Pathway, a proven continuum linking a 24/7 drop-in center, shelter, transitional housing, behavioral health care, and…

Health
7
Larkin Street Youth Services

The mission of Larkin Street Youth Services is to create a continuum of services that inspires youth to move beyond the street. We will nurture potential, promote dignity, and support bold steps by all.

Human Services
8
Homeless Prenatal Program Inc

Founded in 1989 to provide prenatal care for lowincome and homeless women, HPP has evolved into a dynamic family resource center with a holistic model that integrates a wide array of services to address the specific needs of each client…

Health
9
Abode Services

Abode services offers housing programs linked to supportive services for homeless families, single adults and youth. housing options include permanent supportive housing rental subsidy assistance, rapid rehousing and emergency shelter.…

Housing & Shelter
10
Alameda Family Services Inc

Nonprofit human services organization active in the City of Alameda and the East Bay whose mission is to improve the emotional, psychological, and physical health of children, youth, and their families.

Human Services
11
Eden Council for Hope and Opportunity

Housing counseling services to low and moderate income residents of the Bay Area. Services include placement, discrimination investigations, tenant and landlord dispute resolution, reverse mortgage counseling, and rental assistance…

Housing & Shelter
12
Central City Hospitality House

Hospitality House is a progressive, community-based organization located in San Francisco's Tenderloin, Sixth Street Corridor, and Mid-Market neighborhoods, founded nearly 60 years ago in 1967 by community volunteers during the City's…

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Cornerstone Community Development Corporation and the most unlike its peers is The Regeneration Project. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 29 years old; the field is 15. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number23%4%<5yr15%4%5–10yr19%15%10–20yr18%36%20–35yr13%26%35–55yr12%15%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value23%7%<5yr15%3%5–10yr19%16%10–20yr18%44%20–35yr13%26%35–55yr12%4%55yr+

The field is 23% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 7% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 4% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
4%2/51
the rest of the field
12%
3,089/25,070

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

45 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 45 of the 101 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
14
Early backer (in before they grew)
44/45
Grantees still filing
31/45
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

GREATER RICHMOND INTERFAITH PROGRAM GRIP — $105,000 · OtherGREATER RICHMOND INTERFAITH PROGRAM GRIPEPISCOPAL CHURCH IN THE DIOCESE OF CALIFORNIA — $67,000 · OtherYOUTH SPIRIT ARTWORKS — $50,000 · OtherGLOBAL COMMUNICATION EDUCATION & ART — $50,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $45,000 · OtherATTITUDINAL HEALING CONNECTION — $45,000 · OtherHOPE SOLUTIONS — $45,000 · OtherFESCO — $45,000 · OtherBAYSHORE CHRISTIAN MINISTRIES — $45,000 · OtherHOME & HOPE — $45,000 · OtherSOJOURN — $43,350 · OtherARIEL OUTREACH MISSION — $50,000 · Other+57 more — $656,665 · Other+57 moreBEYOND EMANCIPATION — $130,000 · Human ServicesBEYOND EMANCIPATIONNew Creation Home Ministries — $60,000 · Human ServicesNew Creation Home Ministr…RAPHAEL HOUSE OF SAN FRANCISCO INC — $49,282 · Human ServicesRAPHAEL HOUSE OF SAN FRAN…PARENT VOICES OAKLAND — $40,000 · Human ServicesPARENT VOICES OAKLANDSan Francisco Safehouse — $40,000 · Human ServicesSan Francisco SafehouseCenter for Domestic Peace — $40,000 · Human ServicesCenter for Domestic PeaceALAMEDA POINT COLLABORATIVE — $40,000 · Human ServicesALAMEDA POINT COLLABORATI…MONUMENT CRISIS CENTER — $30,000 · Human ServicesMONUMENT CRISIS CENTERAbundant Grace Coastside Worker Inc — $28,000 · Human ServicesFIRST PLACE FOR YOUTH — $25,000 · Human ServicesST VINCENT DE PAUL SOCIETY DISTRICT COUNCIL OF MARIN COUNTY — $25,000 · Human Services+4 more — $35,100 · Human Services+4 moreOakland Elizabeth House — $90,000 · Housing & ShelterOakland Eli…NON-PROFIT HOUSING ASSOCIATION OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA — $40,000 · Housing & ShelterNON-PROFIT …Human Investment Project Inc — $30,000 · Housing & ShelterHuman Inves…REBUILDING TOGETHER SAN FRANCISCO — $25,000 · Housing & ShelterREBUILDING …BUILDING OPP FOR SELF-SUFFICIENCY — $25,000 · Housing & ShelterBUILDING OP…Winter Nights Family Shelter Inc — $20,000 · Housing & ShelterWinter Nigh…Contra Costa Interfaith Transitional Housing Inc — $10,000 · Housing & ShelterGilead House — $10,000 · Housing & ShelterYOUTH SPIRIT ARTWORKS — $40,000 · Youth DevelopmentMindful Life Project — $30,000 · Youth Development3RD STREET YOUTH CENTER AND CLINIC — $30,000 · Youth DevelopmentWEHOPE — $30,000 · Youth DevelopmentSISTER-TO-SISTER 2 INCORPORATED — $65,000 · HealthHENRY OHLHOFF HOUSE — $18,300 · HealthCALIFORNIA COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATE ASSOCIATION — $40,000 · Civil RightsAttitudinal Healing Connection Inc dba The Center for ArtEsteem — $20,000 · Civil RightsSojourn Chaplaincy Inc — $58,200 · Philanthropy
Other$1,292,015Human Services$542,382Housing & Shelter$250,000Youth Development$130,000Health$83,300Civil Rights$60,000Philanthropy$58,200

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetBEYOND EMANCIPATION — $130,000 over 6y, 0.9% of budgetGREATER RICHMOND INTERFAITH PROGRAM GRIP — $105,000 over 3y, 2.9% of budgetOakland Elizabeth House — $90,000 over 3y, 6.3% of budgetSISTER-TO-SISTER 2 INCORPORATED — $65,000 over 2y, 2.5% of budgetNew Creation Home Ministries — $60,000 over 2y, 9.1% of budgetSojourn Chaplaincy Inc — $58,200 over 3y, 4.3% of budgetARIEL OUTREACH MISSION — $50,000 over 1y, 28% of budgetRAPHAEL HOUSE OF SAN FRANCISCO INC — $49,282 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetNON-PROFIT HOUSING ASSOCIATION OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA — $40,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetPARENT VOICES OAKLAND — $40,000 over 2y, 2.8% of budgetYOUTH SPIRIT ARTWORKS — $40,000 over 1y, 3.1% of budgetSan Francisco Safehouse — $40,000 over 1y, 4.5% of budgetCALIFORNIA COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATE ASSOCIATION — $40,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetCenter for Domestic Peace — $40,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetALAMEDA POINT COLLABORATIVE — $40,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetMONUMENT CRISIS CENTER — $30,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetMindful Life Project — $30,000 over 2y, 2.0% of budget3RD STREET YOUTH CENTER AND CLINIC — $30,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetHuman Investment Project Inc — $30,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetSAMARITAN HOUSE — $30,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetWEHOPE — $30,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetAbundant Grace Coastside Worker Inc — $28,000 over 3y, 8.5% of budgetREBUILDING TOGETHER SAN FRANCISCO — $25,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetFIRST PLACE FOR YOUTH — $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetST VINCENT DE PAUL SOCIETY DISTRICT COUNCIL OF MARIN COUNTY — $25,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetBUILDING OPP FOR SELF-SUFFICIENCY — $25,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetLoaves and Fishes of Contra Costa — $20,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetAttitudinal Healing Connection Inc dba The Center for ArtEsteem — $20,000 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetWinter Nights Family Shelter Inc — $20,000 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetHENRY OHLHOFF HOUSE — $18,300 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetTHE GUBBIO PROJECT INC — $15,000 over 1y, 4.3% of budgetHOUSING CONSORTIUM OF THE EAST BAY — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetContra Costa Interfaith Transitional Housing Inc — $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCORNERSTONE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCatholic Charities San Bernardino & Riverside Counties — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMARIN PREGNANCY CLINIC — $10,000 over 1y, 7.7% of budgetA DIAMOND IN THE RUFF INC — $10,000 over 1y, 8.2% of budgetFAMILY EMERGENCY SHELTER COALITION — $10,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetYoung Men's Christian Association of the East Bay — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEpiscopal Community Services — $5,100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE REGENERATION PROJECT — $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetECOLOGY CENTER — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The San Francisco Fou…Kaiser Foundation Hos…East Bay Community Fo…Sunlight GivingUnited Way of the Bay…Tipping Point Communi…Marin Community Found…Silicon Valley Commun…Jewish Community Fede…Bernard E & Alba Witk…Lowell Berry Foundati…Dean and Margaret Les…
The San Francisco FoundationCA55.2× affinity32 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The San Francisco Foundation · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · East Bay Community Foundation · Sunlight Giving · United Way of the Bay Area · Tipping Point Community · Marin Community Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & Sonoma · Bernard E & Alba Witkin Charitable Foundation · Lowell Berry Foundation · Dean and Margaret Lesher Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Episcopal Impact Fund FKA Episcopal Charities funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%8%17%30%your share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    24report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 101 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home
    State money flows
    the interactive map of money crossing state lines