· Public charity
Andrew S Roddick Foundation Inc
The mission of the andy roddick foundation is to work with the community to expand opportunities for young people to learn, thrive, and succeed.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 2 grants below total $355,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $369,500 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $14,500 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- $10k–50k1 grant · $25k
- $250k+1 grant · $330k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF THE AUSTIN AREA | $330,000 |
| AFFORDABLE CHILDCARE TODAY | $25,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–18, $32k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +47% since the first grant, against +9% for the ones you funded once.
10 repeat relationships — 0 still active in FY2024, 10 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $355k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- BBookSpring3× · 2017–2019 · $300k · revenue +211%
- CACreative Action3× · 2017–2021 · $117k · revenue +54%
- FSFilm Society of Austin Inc2× · 2017–2018 · $79k · revenue +47%
Funded once
- LOLEAP OF JOYone grant, 2021 · $49k · revenue -37% · 49% of their budget
- TPTEXAS PARTNERSHIP FOR OUT OF SCHOOL TIMEgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $39k · revenue +338%
- AKAUSTIN KIDS CANone grant, 2021 · $34k · revenue -62% · 90% of their budget
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
ATX KIDS CLUB's mission is to empower youth through educational adventures that promote independence, confidence, and a deeper connection to their community - one field trip at a time.
Leadership austin connects and develops leaders to courageously engage and transform our communities.
To equip Austinites to make informed decisions through independent, in-depth reporting, diverse opinions, and civil dialogue. A strong local press is essential for a healthy community and democracy. We work to make Austin a more empowered…
Good Work Austin's mission is to foster healthy careers in the local food and beverage industry through professional development and advocacy for more equitable practices.
Austin Classical School exists to glorify Jesus Christ by co-laboring with families to cultivate wise, virtuous, and humble students through an excellent classical, Christian education.
RAISE Texas advances equitable policies and programs that foster financial security and economic mobility for low- and moderate-income Texans. We equip, innovate and advocate to reduce disparities, remove barriers and build opportunities…
Explore austin empowers youth to reach their full potential through mentoring, leadership, and outdoor adventure.
Austin together enables sustained collaborations that strengthen the nonprofit community to create better outcomes for central texans through our unique grant and community engagement model.
At the Every Texan, we believe in a Texas that offers everyone the chance to compete and succeed in life. We envision a Texas where everyone is healthy, well educated, and financially secure. We want the best Texas, a proud state that sets…
Apie provides college and career readiness support through individualized academic and mentoring programs to prepare students for success.
Trinity episcopal school (trinity) is a not-for-profit independent school whose mission is to provide an enriched academic curriculum in a christian environment. trinity is not affiliated with or sponsored by any parish. we will nurture…
To provide technology training and access to the community, fostering skills that enable people to succeed in the digital age.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Camp Fire Central Texas and the most unlike its peers is Groundwork Music Project. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Camp Fire Central Texas ↗
- Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF AUSTIN AND TRAVIS COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds BookSpring ↗
- Who funds AUSTIN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Creative Action ↗
- Who funds MISSION CAPITAL ↗
- Who funds Film Society of Austin Inc ↗
- Who funds LEAP OF JOY ↗
- Who funds TEXAS PARTNERSHIP FOR OUT OF SCHOOL TIME ↗
- Who funds AUSTIN KIDS CAN ↗
- Who funds GENAUSTIN ↗
- Who funds LEARN ALL THE TIME NETWORK ↗
- Who funds AUSTIN PUBLIC LIBRARY FRIENDS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Groundwork Music Project ↗
- Who funds AUSTIN PUBLIC EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds EXTEND-A-CARE INC ↗
- Who funds KIDS WRITE GOOD ↗
- Who funds ARMSTRONG COMMUNITY MUSIC SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds United Way of Greater Houston ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF EL PASO COUNTY ↗
- Who funds Fort Worth SPARC ↗
- Who funds AUSTIN YOUTH RIVER WATCH ↗
- Who funds DALLAS AFTERSCHOOL ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITIES FOUNDATION OF TEXAS INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Austin Community Foundation Inc · The Applied Materials Foundation · Better Business Bureau · United Way for Greater Austin · St David's Foundation · The Powell Foundation · The Moody Foundation · The Webber Family Foundation · Greater Austin Performing Arts Center Inc · The Seawell Elam Foundation · Mfi Foundation · Harry E and Eda L Montandon Charitable Tr
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Andrew S Roddick Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.