· Private foundation
E Kemper Carter & Anna Curry Carter Community
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k1 grant · $5k
- $10k–50k4 grants · $85k
- $50k–250k4 grants · $475k
- $250k+1 grant · $300k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| AMERICAN ROYAL ASSOCIATION | $300,000 |
| DTC COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT INC | $200,000 |
| MAKE-A-WISH KANSAS AND MISSOURI | $150,000 |
| GREATER KANSAS CITY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION | $75,000 |
| GUADALUPE CENTERS | $50,000 |
| THE PHOENIX FAMILY HOUSING CORPORATION | $25,000 |
| KANSAS CITY REPERTORY THEATRE INC | $25,000 |
| LYRIC OPERA OF KANSAS CITY | $25,000 |
| JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF MIDDLE AMERICA I | $10,000 |
| ST LUKES FOUNDATION | $5,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–24, $296k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 86% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +22% since the first grant, against +20% for the ones you funded once.
25 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2024, 21 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 47% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $415k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- SMST MICHAEL'S VETERANS CENTER INC4× · 2019–2023 · $250k · revenue +43%
- LOLYRIC OPERA OF KANSAS CITY INC3× · 2022–2024 · $200k · revenue +36%
- TPTHE PHOENIX FAMILY HOUSING CORPORATION4× · 2019–2024 · $125k · revenue +39%
Funded once
- MRMISSOURI RESTAURANT ASSOCIATIONone grant, 2020 · $250k · revenue +7% · 45% of their budget
- SSSYNERGY SERVICES INCgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $100k · revenue +31%
- LOLYRIC OPERAone grant, 2020 · $75k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Helping people move to a better life through hope-filled care, services, and advocacy; calling all those of goodwill to join us
Grow food, farms and community in support of a sustainable, healthy and local food system.
The full employment council is a business-led, private, nonprofit corporation whose mission is to obtain public and private sector employment for the unemployed and underemployed residents of the greater kansas city area.
Leading the way to the best kc region by convening innovative leaders, collaborating with like-minded organizations, advocating for positive change, and helping small businesses grow.
Kacap supports community action agencies and other human services organizations in thier local, state and national efforts to end poverty.
Our mission is to create an environment where all citizens can live safely and have access to real opportunities.
Addressing the causes and effects of poverty by uniting staff, individuals, families, and community partners to provide quality, comprehensive services through compassionate, respectful relationships.
Offer hope to build a better tomorrow through mental health services.
KC Tenants organizes to ensure that everyone in Kansas City has a safe, accessible, and truly affordable home.
Kansas legal services is devoted to helping low income kansans meet their basic needs through the provision of important legal and mediation services.
Bike share kc provides the greater kansas city area with a bike share system designed for transportation, recreation, and exercise.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Safehome Inc and the most unlike its peers is Lyriks Institution. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 31 years old; the field is 20. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
81 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 81 of the 104 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds AMERICAN ROYAL ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds MISSOURI RESTAURANT ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds ST MICHAEL'S VETERANS CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds LYRIC OPERA OF KANSAS CITY INC ↗
- Who funds DTC COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT INC ↗
- Who funds THE PHOENIX FAMILY HOUSING CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds VETERANS COMMUNITY PROJECT ↗
- Who funds Greater Kansas City Community Foundation ↗
- Who funds ALLIANCE FOR CHOICE IN EDUCATION ↗
- Who funds KIDSTLC INC ↗
- Who funds SYNERGY SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds THE CHOSEN & DEARLY LOVED FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE RESEARCH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds KANSAS CITY REPERTORY THEATRE INC ↗
- Who funds CHILD PROTECTION CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds STARLIGHT THEATRE ASSOCIATION OF KANSAS CITY INC ↗
- Who funds INCLUSION CONNECTIONS INC ↗
- Who funds VARIETY THE CHILDRENS CHARITY OF ST LOUIS ↗
- Who funds OLATHE MEDICAL CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds THANK YOU WALT DISNEY INC ↗
- Who funds GUADALUPE CENTERS INC ↗
- Who funds Welcome House Inc ↗
- Who funds ARIZONA RESTAURANT AND HOSPITALITY ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds LION GLOBAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds LAZARUS MINISTRIES KC ↗
- Who funds SHEFFIELD PLACE ↗
- Who funds THE EDUCATOR ACADEMY INC ↗
- Who funds SLEEPYHEAD BEDS ↗
- Who funds RIVER OF REFUGE ↗
- Who funds WOMENS EMPLOYMENT NETWORK ↗
- Who funds CENTER OF GRACE INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Greater Kansas City Community Foundation · The H & R Block Foundation · Health Forward Foundation · United Way of Greater Kansas City Inc · The Sunderland Foundation · Geraldine and R a Barrows Foundation 10013700 · Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation · William T Kemper Foundation Commerce Bank Trustee · R a Long Foundation 600 Plaza West Bldg · Oppenstein Brothers Foundation · The Kansas City Royals Foundation · Kearney Wornall Foundation 10017900
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization E Kemper Carter & Anna Curry Carter Community funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.