· Private foundation
Judge C F Moulton Christmas Poor Fund
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k19 grants · $101k
- $10k–50k18 grants · $369k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF KC-ST JOSEPH INC | $35,000 |
| COMMUNITY SERVICES LEAGUE OF JACKSON COUNTY | $35,000 |
| SALVATION ARMY | $30,000 |
| GUADALUPE CENTER INC | $29,315 |
| COMMUNITY FOOD PANTRY FBO ADRIAN MINISTERIAL ALLIANCE | $26,000 |
| OPERATION BREAKTHROUGH INC | $25,000 |
| LILYS HOUSE | $21,272 |
| COMMUNITY FOOD PANTRY FBO BUTLER CHRISTIAN MINISTERIAL ALLIANCE | $20,000 |
| WEST CENTRAL MISSOURI COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY | $20,000 |
| COMMUNITY FOOD PANTRY | $18,000 |
| JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES | $17,000 |
| BISHOP SULLIVAN CENTER INC 052196 | $16,000 |
| METROPOLITAN LUTHERAN MINISTRY | $15,000 |
| JOURNEY TO NEW LIFE INC | $15,000 |
| JEWISH VOCATIONAL SERVICE BUREAU OF KANSAS CITY | $14,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $770k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 92% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
46 repeat relationships — 36 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- GCGUADALUPE CENTERS INC6× · 2020–2025 · $151k · revenue +63%
- WCWEST CENTRAL MISSOURI COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY6× · 2020–2025 · $129k · revenue +25%
- OBOPERATION BREAKTHROUGH INC5× · 2021–2025 · $122k · revenue +3%
Funded once
- BCBUTLER CHRISTIAN MINISTERIAL ALLIANCEone grant, 2023 · $24k
- OBOPERATION BREAKTHROUGH INC ST VINCENT'S FAMILY SERVICES CENTERone grant, 2020 · $20k
- WHWelcome House Incone grant, 2020 · $3k · revenue +3%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To empower adults and families to become independent and permanently housed. the organization provides shelter, food, and other life sustaining materials and activities for destitute families, children and the homeless in the city of st.…
The Crisis Center provides shelter and services to victims and their children of domestic and sexual violence.
All of Cornerstone efforts are directed toward interrupting the cycle of homelessness, providing decent, safe, accessible and affordable housing of choice to moderate and low-income households, and revitalizing Topeka neighborhoods.
Community Development and Community Center and social services
ReHope empowers and elevates survivors of human trafficking and sexual exploitation through its faith-based, trauma-informed residence and recovery programs.
To provide people in the Kansas City area affected by poverty with services and opportunities that encourage self-confidence, meet the needs of today, and provide the tools for future self-sufficiency.
Helping people move from poverty towards prosperity.
Mission Missouri provides comprehensive services to recover, reconcile and restore families and individuals to total well-being.
Our Mission is to solve homelessness as we know it by establishing a pathway for our unhoused neighbors to a home with dignity.
We exist to welcome our new-American neighbors with Gospel-focused ministries of mercy so they might know, love, and follow Jesus into His Kingdom
To provide shelter and advocacy services to victims of domestic violence, sexual assault, and stalking in the 11 counties of southeast kansas.
Bethany House Services empowers homeless and at-risk families with the solutions to achieve housing stability and long-term self-sufficiency.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Catholic Charities of Kansas City - St Joseph Inc and the most unlike its peers is Bates County Industries Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 34 years old; the field is 24. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
41 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 41 of the 53 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Community Services League of Jackson County ↗
- Who funds GUADALUPE CENTERS INC ↗
- Who funds WEST CENTRAL MISSOURI COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY ↗
- Who funds OPERATION BREAKTHROUGH INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY FOOD PANTRY OF BUTLER ↗
- Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF KANSAS CITY - ST JOSEPH INC ↗
- Who funds METROPOLITAN LUTHERAN MINISTRY ↗
- Who funds Bishop Sullivan Center Inc ↗
- Who funds Seton Center Inc ↗
- Who funds LILYS HOUSE ↗
- Who funds Journey to New Life INC ↗
- Who funds BATES COUNTY INDUSTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds JEWISH VOCATIONAL SERVICE BUREAU OF KANSAS CITY ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY LINC ↗
- Who funds City Union Mission ↗
- Who funds SAVE INC ↗
- Who funds JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES ↗
- Who funds FOSTERADOPT CONNECT INC ↗
- Who funds THE PHOENIX FAMILY HOUSING CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds HOPE NETWORK OF RAYTOWN ↗
- Who funds SHEFFIELD PLACE ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY ASSISTANCE COUNCIL INC ↗
- Who funds LEE'S SUMMIT SOCIAL SERVICES ↗
- Who funds GRANDVIEW ASSISTANCE PROGRAM ↗
- Who funds BENILDE HALL ↗
- Who funds SYNERGY SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds RECONCILIATION SERVICES ↗
- Who funds ARTISTS HELPING THE HOMELESS INC ↗
- Who funds Amethyst Place Inc ↗
- Who funds Shepherds Center of Kansas Cty Ctl ↗
- Who funds KC MOTHERS IN CHARGE ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: United Way of Greater Kansas City Inc · Greater Kansas City Community Foundation · Health Forward Foundation · Oppenstein Brothers Foundation · Menorah Heritage Foundation · The H & R Block Foundation · The Sunderland Foundation · Giving the Basics Inc · Jackson County Community Children's Services Fund · William T Kemper Foundation Commerce Bank Trustee · Jewish Community Foundation of Greater Kansas City · Commerce Bancshares Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Judge C F Moulton Christmas Poor Fund funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.