· Public charity
United Way of Greater Kansas City Inc
United way of greater kansas city assembles the best available resources to provide the farthest-reaching network of support for those in need in our community.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 300 grants below total $11,131,904 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $15,530,013 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $4,398,109 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k59 grants · $407k
- $10k–50k183 grants · $4.4M
- $50k–250k56 grants · $5.4M
- $250k+2 grants · $877k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| KC Core | $505,000 |
| Catholic Charities of Northeast Kansas | $371,647 |
| Boys and Girls Clubs of Greater Kansas City | $220,780 |
| Children's Mercy Hospitals and Clinics | $218,188 |
| Operation Breakthrough | $216,339 |
| Rose Brooks Center | $204,133 |
| Metro Lutheran Ministry | $182,532 |
| Harvesters | $170,076 |
| El Centro Inc | $155,458 |
| YMCA of Greater Kansas City | $141,173 |
| Futures First (formerly The Family Conservancy) | $135,344 |
| Synergy Services | $134,722 |
| Associates Caring for Eachother | $125,297 |
| Avenue of Life | $120,021 |
| Guadalupe Centers Inc | $119,929 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $29.9M) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 78% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +33% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.
403 repeat relationships — 216 still active in FY2025, 187 since wound down; 81 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2.2M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TFTHE FAMILY CONSERVANCY7× · 2017–2025 · $3.8M · revenue +6%
- TCThe Children's Mercy Hospital7× · 2017–2025 · $3.5M · revenue +67%
- CCCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF NORTHEAST KANSAS INC7× · 2017–2025 · $3.4M · revenue +24%
Funded once
- COCURATORS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI SPECIAL TRone grant, 2021 · $146k
- FOFRIENDS OF YATES INCone grant, 2021 · $134k · revenue +24%
- HCHEARTLAND CENTER FOR JOBS AND FREEDOM INCgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $124k · revenue +143%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Engaging and aligning providers and stakeholders to establish Kansas as a role model for health care quality and a top performer in health care outcomes.
Offer hope to build a better tomorrow through mental health services.
Kacap supports community action agencies and other human services organizations in thier local, state and national efforts to end poverty.
To provide dynamic, culturally-sensitive, high quality behavioral healthcare to residents of chase, coffey, greenwood, lyon, morris, osage and wabaunsee counties in the most effective, caring and efficient manner.
This organization is committed to community networking and coalition building to help eradicate homelessness in the Greater Kansas City metro area. The organization was formed to address the concerns and interests of the homeless…
Leading the way to the best kc region by convening innovative leaders, collaborating with like-minded organizations, advocating for positive change, and helping small businesses grow.
To protect and promote the well-being of children by providing ongoing support of the charitable mission of the kansas children's service league.
Addressing the causes and effects of poverty by uniting staff, individuals, families, and community partners to provide quality, comprehensive services through compassionate, respectful relationships.
Providing innovative research, message guidance, communication training, communication expertise,and collaborative strategies to aligned organizations to grow their capacity and improve collaborationand coordination among partner groups in…
Helping people move from poverty towards prosperity.
The Welcome House is a non-profit, sober living, recovery program (incorporated in 1971) with the sole purpose of educating and rehabilitating the adult male alcoholic/ addict and the expressed mission of returning the individual to…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Fosteradopt Connect Inc and the most unlike its peers is Seeing Yourself in Science. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 33 years old; the field is 19. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 6% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.9% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
494 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 494 of the 644 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THE FAMILY CONSERVANCY ↗
- Who funds The Children's Mercy Hospital ↗
- Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF NORTHEAST KANSAS INC ↗
- Who funds BOYS CLUB OF GREATER KANSAS CITY ↗
- Who funds Greater Kansas City Community Foundation ↗
- Who funds YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER KANSAS CITY ↗
- Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
- Who funds LOCAL INITIATIVES SUPPORT CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF KANSAS CITY - ST JOSEPH INC ↗
- Who funds OPERATION BREAKTHROUGH INC ↗
- Who funds HEART OF AMERICA COUNCIL BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA ↗
- Who funds HARVESTERS - THE COMMUNITY FOOD NETWORK ↗
- Who funds JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES ↗
- Who funds METROPOLITAN LUTHERAN MINISTRY ↗
- Who funds Community Services League of Jackson County ↗
- Who funds ROSE BROOKS CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds GUADALUPE CENTERS INC ↗
- Who funds WORKING FAMILIES FRIEND ↗
- Who funds DELLA LAMB COMMUNITY SERVICES ↗
- Who funds ABILITY KC ↗
- Who funds Legal Aid of Western Missouri ↗
- Who funds CHC CREATING HEALTHIER COMMUNITIES ↗
- Who funds GIRL SCOUTS OF NE KANSAS AND NW MISSOURI INC ↗
- Who funds MATTIE RHODES MEMORIAL SOCIETY D/B/A MATTIE RHODES CENTER ↗
- Who funds SYNERGY SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds Big Brothers Big Sisters Kansas City ↗
- Who funds CORNERSTONES OF CARE ↗
- Who funds HOPE HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds TRUMAN MEDICAL CENTER INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds METROPOLITAN ORGANIZATION COUNTERING SEXUAL ASSAULT ↗
- Who funds EL CENTRO INC ↗
- Who funds KIDSTLC INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED INNER CITY SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds Kansas City CARE Clinic ↗
- Who funds United Community Services of Johnson County Inc ↗
- Who funds SAFEHOME INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Health Forward Foundation · Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation · Oppenstein Brothers Foundation · Greater Kansas City Community Foundation · The H & R Block Foundation · Menorah Heritage Foundation · Jackson County Community Children's Services Fund · The Kansas City Royals Foundation · R a Long Foundation 600 Plaza West Bldg · The Sunderland Foundation · The Francis Family Foundation · The Sherman Family Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization United Way of Greater Kansas City Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- City Year Inc — 11% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.