· Public charity
The Reach Healthcare Foundation
To advance equity in health care coverage, access, and quality for poor and underserved people.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 68 grants below total $4,213,245 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $4,318,573 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $105,328 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k10 grants · $63k
- $10k–50k29 grants · $872k
- $50k–250k29 grants · $3.3M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| KU Endowment obo Center for African American Health | $240,000 |
| Migrant Farmworkers Assistance Fund | $181,000 |
| HCC Network | $180,000 |
| El Centro | $163,000 |
| Mattie Rhodes Center | $157,000 |
| Jewish Vocational Service Bureau Of Kansas City | $150,000 |
| Community Health Center of Southeast Kansas | $145,000 |
| AdHoc Group Against Crime | $136,000 |
| The Village Initiative Inc | $135,000 |
| Swope Health | $130,000 |
| Missouri Budget Project | $130,000 |
| BlaqOut Inc | $130,000 |
| Cass Community Health Foundation | $123,895 |
| Southeast Kansas Mental Health Center | $105,000 |
| Kids Win Missouri | $101,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–24, $2.2M) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 76% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +66% since the first grant, against +23% for the ones you funded once.
59 repeat relationships — 47 still active in FY2024, 12 since wound down; 21 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $502k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- THTURNER HOUSE CLINIC INC4× · 2019–2024 · $733k · revenue +703%
- CCCOMMUNITY CARE NETWORK OF KANSAS INC3× · 2019–2023 · $648k · revenue +70%
- SUSAMUEL U RODGERS HEALTH CENTER INC4× · 2019–2024 · $628k · revenue +39%
Funded once
- JCJOHNSON COUNTY KANSASone grant, 2019 · $155k
- RIRESTART INCgraduatedone grant, 2019 · $124k · revenue +28%
- BIBURRELL INCone grant, 2023 · $105k · revenue +23%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Engaging and aligning providers and stakeholders to establish Kansas as a role model for health care quality and a top performer in health care outcomes.
To provide dynamic, culturally-sensitive, high quality behavioral healthcare to residents of chase, coffey, greenwood, lyon, morris, osage and wabaunsee counties in the most effective, caring and efficient manner.
Offer hope to build a better tomorrow through mental health services.
Providing innovative research, message guidance, communication training, communication expertise,and collaborative strategies to aligned organizations to grow their capacity and improve collaborationand coordination among partner groups in…
This organization is committed to community networking and coalition building to help eradicate homelessness in the Greater Kansas City metro area. The organization was formed to address the concerns and interests of the homeless…
The mission of healthcore clinic, inc is to provide quality family healthcare through improved access and a heightened and unrelenting focus on education and prevention.
Our mission is to create an environment where all citizens can live safely and have access to real opportunities.
Care Beyond the Boulevard (CBB) provides quality medical care, case management, and respite services to the homeless, uninsured, and vulnerable people of Greater Kansas City.
Improve the health of all kansans through nonpartisan research, education and engagement that support effective policymaking.
The vision of the Association is optimal health for Kansans. The Association's mission is to be the leading advocate and resource for members.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Compass Health Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Greenline Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 26 years old; the field is 21. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
95 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 95 of the 111 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds TURNER HOUSE CLINIC INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY CARE NETWORK OF KANSAS INC ↗
- Who funds SAMUEL U RODGERS HEALTH CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY HEALTH COUNCIL OF WYANDOTTE COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds HCC Network ↗
- Who funds Migrant Farmworkers Assistance Fund ↗
- Who funds The Kansas University Endowment Association ↗
- Who funds EL CENTRO INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER OF SE KANSAS INC ↗
- Who funds JEWISH VOCATIONAL SERVICE BUREAU OF KANSAS CITY ↗
- Who funds MISSOURI COALITION FOR PRIMARY HEALTH CARE ↗
- Who funds MISSOURI BUDGET PROJECT ↗
- Who funds MATTIE RHODES MEMORIAL SOCIETY D/B/A MATTIE RHODES CENTER ↗
- Who funds TRUMAN MEDICAL CENTER CHARITABLE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THRIVE ALLEN COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds Kansas City CARE Clinic ↗
- Who funds Southeast Kansas Mental Health Center ↗
- Who funds The Children's Mercy Hospital ↗
- Who funds CASS COMMUNITY HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SISTERS IN CHRIST ↗
- Who funds THE VILLAGE INITIATIVE ↗
- Who funds BLAQOUT ↗
- Who funds KANSAS ACTION FOR CHILDREN INC ↗
- Who funds SWOPE HEALTH SERVICES ↗
- Who funds AD HOC GROUP AGAINST CRIME ↗
- Who funds COMPASS HEALTH INC ↗
- Who funds United Community Services of Johnson County Inc ↗
- Who funds KIDS WIN MISSOURI ↗
- Who funds Rediscover ↗
- Who funds Maintsream Civic Engagement Foundation ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION OF KS ↗
- Who funds Uzazi Village ↗
- Who funds TRI-COUNTY MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds KIDSTLC INC ↗
- Who funds WYANDOT BEHAVIORAL HEALTH NETWORK INC ↗
- Who funds HEALTH PARTNERSHIP CLINIC INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Health Forward Foundation · United Way of Greater Kansas City Inc · Greater Kansas City Community Foundation · Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation · Kansas Health Foundation · Menorah Heritage Foundation · Oppenstein Brothers Foundation · The Sunderland Foundation · Jackson County Community Children's Services Fund · The H & R Block Foundation · Sunflower Foundation Health Care for Kansans · William T Kemper Foundation Commerce Bank Trustee
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Reach Healthcare Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- The Center for Effective Philanthropy Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.